My $10/year phone-only plan isn't available any more, unfortunately. We
have two of them. My usage can't even justify a $10/month plan if such
a thing existed. I use my home wifi connection to transfer photos and
do whatever other (MINIMAL!) stuff I have to use the phone for. I just
bought a $30 SIM which gives me 3GB of date and allows me to use my
google phone number. I haven't had occasion to use it beyond testing,
but the data lasts forever as long as I add $3 worth once a year. Seems
legit. If not, I'm out $30 and back where I started.
> I don't have a smartphone, flip phone, web cam, or broadband.
> The costs are simply not worth it to me.
Minimal cost. If you can transfer your photos to your computer by wifi
you don't need a plan of any kind.
> I'm no technophobe. I'm a retired computer scientist, but
> see no personal need for the expensive toys and additional
> on-going expenses to my budget.
Spectrum internet at $40/month for 550/22 Mb internet seems reasonable.
When our 2-year introductory plan is up we'll switch to AT&T's
introductory plan. Good to finally have competition. Add in $7.50 for
Ooma VOIP and it's still plenty cheap. When we canceled AT&T a number
of years ago they wanted $30/month for local-only landline plus a
minimum of $3/month for LD capability. No.
> Nyssa, who doesn't do social media either (except Usenet,
> of course)
Usenet ain't what it used to be. Did we grow out of it? Was the lure
of cat videos on demand too tempting to refuse? Did RSpeed and his ilk
kill it? Did people not know how to create killfiles or ignore loons?
Crying shame.
I've made Facebook as close to usenet as I can, but it's not even a
halfway-close second.
--
Cheers, Bev
"Do not try to solve all life's problems at once -- learn to
dread each day as it comes." -- Donald Kaul