"georges" <georg...@altavista.com> wrote in message
news:a1v5rt$tdbu0$2...@ID-41741.news.dfncis.de...
> x-no-archive: yes
> "V-07" <sorry no re...@address.com> wrote:
> >Has anyone tried Wal-Mart's $9.95/month ISP service?
>
>
> Nope, but i've been using Kmart's bluelight service at
> home(smae price, unlimited connect ) it works just fine
>
> --georges
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> remove one to respond
>
>
"georges" <georg...@altavista.com> wrote in message
news:a1v5rt$tdbu0$2...@ID-41741.news.dfncis.de...
> x-no-archive: yes
> "V-07" <sorry no re...@address.com> wrote:
> >Has anyone tried Wal-Mart's $9.95/month ISP service?
>
>
>"georges" <georg...@altavista.com> wrote in message
>news:a1v5rt$tdbu0$2...@ID-41741.news.dfncis.de...
>> x-no-archive: yes
>> "V-07" <sorry no re...@address.com> wrote:
>> >Has anyone tried Wal-Mart's $9.95/month ISP service?
>>
>>
>> Nope, but i've been using Kmart's bluelight service at
>> home(smae price, unlimited connect ) it works just fine
>>
>> --georges
>>
>This shows me how much profit these ISP's are making at $20US/month.
>
>
Actually, it doesn't - unless you know what their costs and other
overhead are.
--
I have the body of a god -- if you're Buddhist
Or how much extra capacity their corporate network infrastructure
has. This is an easy way to defray the cost of all those T-1 lines,
routers, and UPSs. Just plug in a server or two, a couple of dial-in
servers, and you're up and running. They have enough locations that
they'll always have a local POP.
Pretty good business plan. Gets a chunk of their network cost off of
their overhead budgets for a very small investment.
Gary
--
Gary Heston ghe...@hiwaay.net
If martyrdom is such a good thing in Islam, why aren't the mullahs
on the front lines?
According to a contact at my ISP, it costs them roughly $3.00 and change to
maintain a dialup user; for DSL it's a bit over $7.00 per month.
>Has anyone tried Wal-Mart's $9.95/month ISP service?
I didn't like the users license. You had to weigh more than 300
pounds, and before using any web cam you had to dress in spandex and
have a screaming, snot nosed kid in the room with you.
----
An easy, free way to zap telemarketers - and tips to help torture them
http://www.davehitt.com/jan02/tmmmda.html
I hope Kathy Ireland isn't playing "Interface Developer."
I guess if I were forced to use a discount chain store as my isp, I'd
choose Target!!
I went to the local Walmart store to get a copy of the disk and
installed it today. Signup went without a hitch. The connection speed
seems good. I can get downloads up to 4.8 kbps which is pretty good
for me, same performance as my Earthlink account.
If you have used Aol or Compuserve before, you will be familiar with
the constant pop-up windows, (buddy lists, advertisements, etc.), as
well as window interface and use of "Keywords".
I was surprised when I found out my username(s) (stevenq and
stevenquan) was already in use. The Walmart Connect service has only
been out since what...January 6??? Today is the 22nd of January. I
find it hard to believe my favorite screen names have already been
taken!
I do not like the Walmart Connect Browser. The window seems to always
revert back to a smaller window size instead of filling up the whole
screen. I click on the "Maximize" button, but it seems I'm always
having to do that.
Since the network (as well as software) is based on Aol's Compuserve I
was expecting to have access to the exclusive stuff you usually get on
Aol like Chat, communities, and so forth, but there doesn't seem to be
anything like that. All I pretty much get is access to the Internet
(which is all I really need).
My preferred browser is Opera 6.0 so I won't use the Walmart software
too much anyhow. If Walmart truly allows me to have "Unlimited Access"
to the internet as they are advertising then I will give this service
a 5 stars out of 5 star rating. At $9.95/mo they cannot be beat.
I am wary however. I used Juno at $9.95/mo and when I used the
Internet heavily for two days they sent me an email telling me that I
was one of their heaviest users. They said that they would start
charging me $29.95/mo under their heavy user plan. I thought that was
ridiculous. If you advertise $9.95/mo for "Unlimited" internet access,
you should get Unlimited Internet Access!!!
StevenQ
Switched to it a few weeks ago and have been quite happy. Offers
several local access numbers in my city. Seems pretty reliable
too--rarely drops connections. Speed is about 45k, I think, which is
pretty good. First month is free.
The Walmart interface screen is a lot like AOL's. I don't care for it,
but it would probably be good for newbies. I minimize the Walmart
screen and just use Internet Explorer to surf the Web, which works
fine.
Hard to say. Walmart may be subsidizing their ISP in return for
keeping ISP subscribers aware of Walmart; every time you use their
ISP, you see the Walmart name on your screen. See my other post in
this thread for my thoughts as a Walmart ISP user.
Here's a new idea: how about Walmart cable TV service? The TV screen
could show Walmart ads the first moment I turned on my TV and/or have
a Walmart border on the screen. If Walmart was willing to subsidize my
cable TV service, I'd be willing to try it.
Could be like cable TV, where as I understand it, the big cost for the
company is installation, repairs, changes to service etc.
Actually, I think Walmart doesn't really run their ISP, they just
subcontract it all and have the Walmart name put on the screens. When
surfing around via the Walmart ISP interface screen and looking at
different Walmart sites, I think I've seen the name "Compuserve" or
some other big, well-known ISP flash by in the URL line as the URLs
change. Can't remember if it was Compuserve, but my bet is that
Walmart just subcontracted the ISP--probably much cheaper, faster, and
simpler than creating a new, independent ISP service and having to
support it.
You probably wouldn't like the programming.
Instead of watching "Friends" you'd get "Bubba's", which takes place,
not in NYC, but in a trailer park just outside of Buffalo. Monica
would weigh 300 pounds, dress in spandex, and always be carrying a
snot nosed brat who was screaming at the top of his lungs.
neilk...@hotmail.com (Neil) wrote in message news:<daa8d05c.0201...@posting.google.com>...
>neilk...@hotmail.com (Neil) wrote:
>
>>Here's a new idea: how about Walmart cable TV service? The TV screen
>>could show Walmart ads the first moment I turned on my TV and/or have
>>a Walmart border on the screen. If Walmart was willing to subsidize my
>>cable TV service, I'd be willing to try it.
>
>You probably wouldn't like the programming.
>
>Instead of watching "Friends" you'd get "Bubba's", which takes place,
>not in NYC, but in a trailer park just outside of Buffalo. Monica
>would weigh 300 pounds, dress in spandex, and always be carrying a
>snot nosed brat who was screaming at the top of his lungs.
>
LOL. Good one.
Dennis (evil)
--
"There is a fine line between participation and mockery" - Wally
Right. Based on using the service now for about 4 months, I can
describe it fairly well.
The networking is definitely AOL. Check your control panel -- it uses
the AOL dial-up adapter.
The interface and dialer are based directly on the AOL codebase. The
mailer is the AOL mailer. The newsreader is the AOL newsreader. IM
is the AOL Instant Messenger.
Forums are the Compuserve forums. The portal is the Compuserve
portal.
Screennames compete for AOL screen names. For example, if
sasquatch1234 is taken at AOL, it's not available at wmconnect. And
vice versa.
The Parental Controls aren't as complete as the ones available to AOL
subscribers. There's only 2 levels: adult and child. Mail controls
match those of AOL, though, which makes it quite a bargain if you have
a child whose email you want to limit.
[I work at a school district and strongly reccomend parental controls.
I love AOL/WMCONNECT's ability to limit email to child accounts to a
list of people that the parent's have approved. You don't have to spy
on every message, but you keep them from getting mail from strangers.
After all, if your child gets a letter in the mail from someone you
don't know, you're probably going to at least ask them about it!]
Some oddities: while the namespace overlaps AOL, you can't use the
AOL website to check mail. You get told that you have a valid screen
name and password, but are not an AOL subscriber. While the service
uses the Compuserve forums, and the web interface to the Compuserve
forums recognizes your wmconnect username and password, the Compuserve
nntp and smtp servers do not. You do get as full access to
newsgroups as any other AOL subscriber -- through the crippled AOL
newsreader. You don't get any way to check your mail other than being
online and using the AOL newsreader. (Actually, I haven't tried using
Netscape 6's ability to read AOL mail. It might hook, but I'll be
surprised.)
I've not been able to get the Proxomitron proxy filter to work
consistently with WMCONNECT. Could be caused by the fact that I have
Internet Connection Sharing installed, though.
Anyways, I'd give Wal-Mart Connect 4.5 stars out of 5. Easy to set
up, good connectivity. Loses half a star for not having any way to
check mail from the web, and for not using the crippled AOL
newsreader. Beats AOL hands down for price. Could use the complete
parental control set.
Albert Crosby
http://www.walmart.com/walmartconnect/isp/
> Here's the link:
>
> http://www.walmart.com/walmartconnect/isp/
>
>
No news server.