Is Ed a wicked old man?
His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle
the Republican disease, and truly I can't find a place or use for his
rhetoric.
Maybe he's possessed by the Devil, in which case we have to pray to
the Spirits of the Jungle or whoever you believe in, so his soul is
finally placed in a bottle and anchored to the bottom of the sea.
The most humane solution though is that we place him under restriction
as a dangerous patient...
http://www.boingboing.net/Lester_Bangs01.jpg
and be given electroshocks and Xanax. Maybe marijuana would work if he
hates institutions.
Maybe some pot will make him join the revolution.
Edward Dolan
<nolionn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:06632d45-624d-4d1f...@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
Take your religious concerns and stuff them up your ass, you god damn
fucking moron.
I pray every day that a motorist will run you over and kill you dead. We
need you on these newsgroups like we need another hole in our heads.
No one in their right mind pays any attention to this god damn fucking TM.
He likes to write about monkeys mostly. That is because he is into fucking
them. He is depraved, but more importantly, he is insane. In short, just
another poor crazy Usenet bastard!
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
> "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"<nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:06632d45-624d-4d1f...@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Sometimes I get that impression, but later I think he has dementia or
> > the Republican disease, and truly I can't find a place or use for his
> > rhetoric.
>
> > Maybe he's possessed by the Devil, in which case we have to pray to
> > the Spirits of the Jungle or whoever you believe in, so his soul is
> > finally placed in a bottle and anchored to the bottom of the sea.
>
> > The most humane solution though is that we place him under restriction
> > as a dangerous patient...
>
> >http://www.boingboing.net/Lester_Bangs01.jpg
>
> > and be given electroshocks and Xanax. Maybe marijuana would work if he
> > hates institutions.
>
> > Maybe some pot will make him join the revolution.
>
> Take your religious concerns and stuff them up your ass, you god damn
> fucking moron.
>
> I pray every day that a motorist will run you over and kill you dead. We
> need you on these newsgroups like we need another hole in our heads.
Congratulations TM. You have driven the self-professed atheist to
prayer.
> No one in their right mind pays any attention to this god damn fucking TM.
> He likes to write about monkeys mostly. That is because he is into fucking
> them. He is depraved, but more importantly, he is insane. In short, just
> another poor crazy Usenet bastard!
Well, actually you pay attention to TM and have become his personal
stalker ... playing a role which you claim to disdain. The conundrum
continues.
Edward Dolan
news:7b4cd6ed-a106-4b3d...@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...[...]
> No one in their right mind pays any attention to this god damn fucking TM.
> He likes to write about monkeys mostly. That is because he is into fucking
> them. He is depraved, but more importantly, he is insane. In short, just
> another poor crazy Usenet bastard!
>> Well, actually you pay attention to TM and have become his personal
stalker ... playing a role which you claim to disdain. The conundrum
continues.
Nope, it is all just copy and paste. I am way too lazy to ever stalk anyone.
As you should know by now, the only person in this world I care about is
MYSELF - and former Vice President Cheney of course. He should be on Mount
Rushmore for getting this nation to kick Muslim ass.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7b4cd6ed-a106-4b3d...@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 21, 8:51 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > No one in their right mind pays any attention to this god damn fucking TM.
> > He likes to write about monkeys mostly. That is because he is into fucking
> > them. He is depraved, but more importantly, he is insane. In short, just
> > another poor crazy Usenet bastard!
> >> Well, actually you pay attention to TM and have become his personal
>
> stalker ... playing a role which you claim to disdain. The conundrum
> continues.
>
> Nope, it is all just copy and paste.
Queen of DENIAL ... many of your replies are anything but copy and
paste.
> I am way too lazy to ever stalk anyone.
Queen of DENIAL ... that is exactly what you are doing.
> As you should know by now, the only person in this world I care about is
> MYSELF
On that point we can certainly agree.
> - and former Vice President Cheney of course. He should be on Mount
> Rushmore for getting this nation to kick Muslim ass.
Cheney is a dangerous renegade of sorts, and although I am very anti-
Muslim myself, the numbers of American dead do give me pause.
Edward Dolan
> As you should know by now, the only person in this world I care about is
> MYSELF
>> On that point we can certainly agree.
> - and former Vice President Cheney of course. He should be on Mount
> Rushmore for getting this nation to kick Muslim ass.
>> Cheney is a dangerous renegade of sorts, and although I am very anti-
Muslim myself, the numbers of American dead do give me pause.
What numbers of dead? More died in single battles of WWI and WWII than have
perished in the entire Middle Eastern skirmishes. In fact, the scenario
reminds me of how the US Army cleared the West of Indians in the 19th
century.
It is liberal hypocrisy to bemoan the fallen and the dead. They could care
less about that. What liberals care about is ensuring the decline of the
West to the advantage of third world rabble. No one illustrates this better
than Obama. He should have stayed in Indonesia. He would be happy there with
his own kind.
JimmyMac
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2794ffdd-249a-42a5...@l20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 22, 11:50 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > As you should know by now, the only person in this world I care about is
> > MYSELF
> >> On that point we can certainly agree.
> > - and former Vice President Cheney of course. He should be on Mount
> > Rushmore for getting this nation to kick Muslim ass.
> >> Cheney is a dangerous renegade of sorts, and although I am very anti-
>
> Muslim myself, the numbers of American dead do give me pause.
>
> What numbers of dead? More died in single battles of WWI and WWII than have
> perished in the entire Middle Eastern skirmishes. In fact, the scenario
> reminds me of how the US Army cleared the West of Indians in the 19th
> century.
Mr. "SENSITIVITY" strikes again. WW1 and WW2 were entirely different
types of conflicts employing entirely means of warfare in an entirely
different era. I should not have to point out that you are comparing
apples and oranges, but that is immaterial to my observation. With a
combined number of deaths of American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan
now at over 5500, the number of deaths are not insignificant and their
significance cannot be determined by comparing them to other wars. I
don't know ore even care at what point you consider the threhsold in
raw numbers to become tragic, but I suggest that a parent who has lost
one of their children would put threshold at ONE! Once again you have
demonstrated whatt a warm and fuzzy kind of guy you are. I am
embarrassed to acknowledge that you and I are of the same species.
> It is liberal hypocrisy to bemoan the fallen and the dead. They could care
> less about that. What liberals care about is ensuring the decline of the
> West to the advantage of third world rabble. No one illustrates this better
> than Obama. He should have stayed in Indonesia. He would be happy there with
> his own kind.
I am not a liberal and my comment was not about politics.
Edward Dolan
On Oct 23, 1:26 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> ... although I am very anti-
> Muslim myself, the numbers of American dead do give me pause.
Edward Dolan wrote:
> What numbers of dead? More died in single battles of WWI and WWII than
> have
> perished in the entire Middle Eastern skirmishes. In fact, the scenario
> reminds me of how the US Army cleared the West of Indians in the 19th
> century.
>> Mr. "SENSITIVITY" strikes again. WW1 and WW2 were entirely different
types of conflicts employing entirely means of warfare in an entirely
different era. I should not have to point out that you are comparing
apples and oranges, but that is immaterial to my observation.
War is war. I doubt that the soldiers in the region of conflict think it is
any different.
>> With a
combined number of deaths of American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan
now at over 5500, the number of deaths are not insignificant and their
significance cannot be determined by comparing them to other wars.
Why not? War is war! A few thousand dead in a nation of 300 million is
nothing.
>> I
don't know ore even care at what point you consider the threhsold in
raw numbers to become tragic, but I suggest that a parent who has lost
one of their children would put threshold at ONE! Once again you have
demonstrated whatt a warm and fuzzy kind of guy you are. I am
embarrassed to acknowledge that you and I are of the same species.
The above is nothing but liberal sentimentality. It is why we could lose our
wars. Those kind of sentiments have also hamstrung Israel in its conflict
with the Palestinians, a war that could be easily won by the Jews if they
would just proceed to slaughter the lot of them.
Tom Sherman's hero, Stalin, knew how to deal with enemies. Another
socialist, Hitler, also knew how to deal with enemies. Neither one of them
ever worried about a few thousand dead. They would not even have noticed
such a minor loss.
> It is liberal hypocrisy to bemoan the fallen and the dead. They could care
> less about that. What liberals care about is ensuring the decline of the
> West to the advantage of third world rabble. No one illustrates this
> better
> than Obama. He should have stayed in Indonesia. He would be happy there
> with
> his own kind.
>> I am not a liberal and my comment was not about politics.
If you are going to get upset about a few thousand dead, then you are
exemplifying the worst aspect of liberalism, its poitically correct
sentimentality. I assure you that the Arabs do not care if hundreds of
thousands of them bite the dust. Nay, they welcome death. I say we should
help them achieve it in the fastest way possible.