Roberta threatens to stalk *another* child Was: You forgot to cancela few others Carl...
Robert Wolfe
> In his never ending quest
You know what rhymes with quest?
TEST
> to demonstrate to everyone that
> combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
> with
> a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
>
...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.
>
> > Pete Charest wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <car...@swbell.not>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>jof3r wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
> >>>>Wolfe <me...@SPexaAMmple.com> typed:
> >>>>
> >>>> *Transveti-snippage*
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey, bitch-bastard. What's up? Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
> >>>>ever heal from that spnaking?
> >>>>
> >
> >
> > Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
>
> Your meltdowns. HTH.
I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what. Every fucking message I send, you
claim is a meltdown. I think it's projection by you, IMO.
...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer "childmisery"
Wilson that email she asked for on usenet? Has it been 2 years yet? She *was* like 5 years old
when I sent it, right? Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert and sending
Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, Okla-homo dressed
up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private jeweler and appraiser
in the Dallas fort worth area. That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself sending Pitt
complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation. Pitt responds telling Carl
that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to hear. They
suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid melting down and
making k0ok comaplaints. Did he do that, Mike?
>
>
> > Thought not. HAND
> >
> >
> >>>>"Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
> >>>>and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
> >>>
> >>>Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
> >>>
> >>>RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
> >>>etc... etc... etc....
> >>
> >>Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
> >>you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
> >
> >
> > I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who thinks his
> > urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
>
> I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
> hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
You think you know me or something, k0ok? If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, rolly-polly ass
will get to stay at home, so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at war with every
*other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).
> Anyway, since
> the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
> possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
> be a raving net loon.
I'm sure I don't. Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle of a damn
battle, had much to do with it? Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions expert...
What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"? Does Joe understand
how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* environment
(except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)? Do you, Mike?
> You should thank him. After all, Mad King
> George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later? Maybe he had a problem
with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill themselves mining
coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery? ...or maybe the inbreeding just made him
insane? What was your damn point again, k0ok? A dead, insane, syphillic King hates me, now?
Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him first for his
sacrifice, and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any rumors about Uncle
Scam wanting to start up the draft. My dad is also intelligent enough to realize that Saddam
Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident. He might have voted for
Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA. If only they knew how to count in
Florida.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>It's a talent, definitely.
> >>
> >>Pete Charest
> >>KookSpotter
> >>If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
> >
> >
> > Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" herself.
> >
> > Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
>
> Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?
Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"? How is providing a
google link "stalking"?
Carl has every right to protect his little babies by telling them to not poast their life stories
online. I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified dangerous
criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and elsewhere online.
Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his attention ahead of
time.
> Some kooks just
> never learn.
>
What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email? Besides her daddy was a
verifiable net.k0ok.
>
> > Whaddayathink, Carl? Yes? No? No answer? Afraid to talk through your "joe Blowspuppet"?
>
> And your proof of this is what?
>
From: "Joe Bloue" <jo...@somesillyplace.com>
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranormal.crop-circles,alt.usenet.kooks
References: <ffd76b6e.0306...@posting.google.com>
<10564803...@cswreg.cos.agilent.com> <3EF8A806...@frontiernet.net>
<10564857...@cswreg.cos.agilent.com>
<46bc38f69e18bb72...@news.meganetnews.com>
<cd5ef973f1505669...@free.teranews.com>
<8ed4adbde3b2747b...@news.meganetnews.com>
<315244c37057b187...@free.teranews.com>
<30459b702d4cef77...@news.meganetnews.com>
<3e5cb685e23a5848...@free.teranews.com>
<613d82fa6cdaede4...@free.teranews.com>
<WA4Ma.175302$cm4.4...@twister.tampabay.rr.com>
<22d2300687be5907...@free.teranews.com>
Subject: Re: Mikey is a fat k0ok who can't admit when he is clearly incorrect!
Lines: 31
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <T5fWa.1430$zs.627...@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.66.15.48
X-Complaints-To: ab...@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1059683827 ST000 65.66.15.48 (Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:07 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 16:37:07 EDT
Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com
X-UserInfo1:
SCSYQN_@FS@URV@[BZDJNFXBBZ\LPCXLLBWLOOAFWIWTEPIB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:37:07 GMT
Anybody out there *not* see 65.66.15.48 located in okcyok? Note the progression of "Joe's"
Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few days after
Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some reason (not even in
google anymore). Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the subject "Whatever
happened to Carl Wilson?". Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting so
nonchalantly. Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet accusation game
knowingly feeding you incorrect information. (You thought I was just stupid, huh?) Your
reaction this time points to a different scenario. Gotta love misdirection, eh?
One can also ask the following questions:
Has Joe ever denied being Carl? Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before? Why are you so *sure* it
isn't Carl? Why is Michael Davis asking for proof, when you'd expect Joe Bloue to be the first
needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* Carl, that is)?
So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I hypothesize that Joe
Bloue is Carl... Along with more support that you guys will surely give out unknowingly. Why do
you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even help you avoid
getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?
>
> > What gives? I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
>
> You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
>
...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading them, and
responding to them. I move then you move... Like chess... HTH
I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock... kook-watch says K0oks use
sockpuppets. Case closed, k0oks.
>
> >
> > MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
> >
> > --
> > Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> >
> > test test test
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > test
> >
> > test
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > test
>
> You failed.
I wasn't testing *me*. Try again, k0ok.... [test] You'll see that you pass the test with flying
colors every time. You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it when all you had
to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say. TEST
> You're still a kook. HTH.
^test^
(test 1234)
test test test {}
test foo("test");
<test>HTH</test>
You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible. Would base64 be better?
>
>
> --
> The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
>
> "I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
(((test]]]
--
Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
*test*
Support
Michael Davis
combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking with
> Michael Davis wrote:
>
>
>>In his never ending quest
>
>
> You know what rhymes with quest?
>
> TEST
>
>
>>to demonstrate to everyone that
>>combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
>
>
> ...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
>
>
>>with
>>a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
>>
>
>
> ...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.
You post stuff to an open forum in the hope that people *won't*
read it??? That's kooky!
>
>
>>>Pete Charest wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <car...@swbell.not>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>jof3r wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
>>>>>>Wolfe <me...@SPexaAMmple.com> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*Transveti-snippage*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hey, bitch-bastard. What's up? Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
>>>>>>ever heal from that spnaking?
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
>>
>>Your meltdowns. HTH.
>
>
> I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what. Every fucking message I send, you
> claim is a meltdown.
Well...Yeah. Just look at them. Normal people don't post the sort
of frothy idiocy you do.
> I think it's projection by you, IMO.
The opinions of the mentally ill are irrelevant.
>
> ...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer "childmisery"
> Wilson that email she asked for on usenet? Has it been 2 years yet? She *was* like 5 years old
> when I sent it, right? Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert and sending
> Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, Okla-homo dressed
> up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private jeweler and appraiser
> in the Dallas fort worth area. That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself sending Pitt
> complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation. Pitt responds telling Carl
> that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to hear. They
> suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid melting down and
> making k0ok comaplaints. Did he do that, Mike?
You still don't get it. You are the problem, Roberta. Blaming your
victims is just another symptom of your mental illness.
>
>
>>
>>>Thought not. HAND
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>"Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
>>>>>>and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
>>>>>
>>>>>RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
>>>>>etc... etc... etc....
>>>>
>>>>Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
>>>>you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
>>>
>>>
>>>I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who thinks his
>>>urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
>>
>>I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
>>hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
>
>
> You think you know me or something,
Yeah.
> k0ok? If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, rolly-polly ass
> will get to stay at home,
Well, they don't take cross-dressing queers or the mentally ill
either, so you've got *two* outs, Mr. Hypocrisy.
> so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at war with every
> *other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).
The war with Iraq is not about the 9/11 attacks. We had plenty of
other reasons to go into Iraq, and it was way over-due.
>
>
>>Anyway, since
>>the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
>>possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
>>be a raving net loon.
>
>
> I'm sure I don't. Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle of a damn
> battle, had much to do with it?
They managed to conquer a world-straddling empire in those get-ups.
> Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions expert...
> What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"? Does Joe understand
> how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* environment
> (except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)? Do you, Mike?
I know how inaccurate the weapons of the day were. What they wore
made little difference. The difference in tactics is what decided
the outcome of the war.
>
>
>>You should thank him. After all, Mad King
>>George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
>
>
> He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later? Maybe he had a problem
> with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill themselves mining
> coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery? ...
I think you just Godwined yourself.
> or maybe the inbreeding just made him
> insane? What was your damn point again, k0ok? A dead, insane, syphillic King hates me, now?
> Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
>
> Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him first for his
> sacrifice,
But you won't emulate him. You must be a great disappointment to
him. He may as well have had a daughter.
> and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any rumors about Uncle
> Scam wanting to start up the draft. My dad is also intelligent enough to realize that Saddam
> Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident.
So what?
> He might have voted for
> Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA. If only they knew how to count in
> Florida.
We do. Dubbya won in Florida. HTH.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>It's a talent, definitely.
>>>>
>>>>Pete Charest
>>>>KookSpotter
>>>>If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
>>>
>>>
>>>Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" herself.
>>>
>>>Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
>>
>>Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
>
>
> How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?
Damn, your reading comprehension sucks even when you are parsing
your own drivel.
>
> Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"?
See above.
> How is providing a
> google link "stalking"?
Dragging in non-combatants, and children at that, is clearly
stalking. Any non psycho can see that.
>
> Carl has every right to protect his little babies
Why do you think he filed a complaint against you?
> by telling them to not poast their life stories
> online. I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified dangerous
> criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and elsewhere online.
You are going to visit him in person?
> Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his attention ahead of
> time.
Typical psycho-think.
>
>
>>Some kooks just
>>never learn.
>>
>
>
> What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email?
Nothing, obviously.
> Besides her daddy was a
> verifiable net.k0ok.
You are not her father, you are just her stalker.
Yeah, and? You have a long history of jumping to stupid
assumptions about who is who's sock puppet. What are the odds you
will be right this time?
> Note the progression of "Joe's"
> Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few days after
> Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some reason (not even in
> google anymore). Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the subject "Whatever
> happened to Carl Wilson?". Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting so
> nonchalantly. Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet accusation game
> knowingly feeding you incorrect information. (You thought I was just stupid, huh?)
No, I always knew you were so much more than just stupid.
> Your
> reaction this time points to a different scenario. Gotta love misdirection, eh?
What reaction?
>
> One can also ask the following questions:
>
> Has Joe ever denied being Carl?
Have you ever denied stuffing small rodents up your rectum?
> Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?
Like you have?
> Why are you so *sure* it
> isn't Carl?
I never claimed it either is or isn't Carl.
> Why is Michael Davis asking for proof,
That's what debunkers do. HTH.
> when you'd expect Joe Bloue to be the first
> needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* Carl, that is)?
Or if he has no idea who Carl is and is used to paranoid kooks
accusing him of being random people who don't post here anymore.
See, there is always more than one possible explanation for
something. You saucer heads just can't seem to grasp that.
>
> So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I hypothesize that Joe
> Bloue is Carl...
You misspelled "fantasize."
> Along with more support that you guys will surely give out unknowingly. Why do
> you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even help you avoid
> getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?
It's not private. Anyone can join. We just charge psychos like you
annual dues of $50000 to cover the potential liability. Send me a
check (a good one) for the above amount and I'll hook you up.
>
>
>>>What gives? I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
>>
>>You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
>>
>
>
> ...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading them, and
> responding to them.
Yep, it's still an open, public forum. Why you are surprised that
people read and respond to you is beyond me, but then I'm not a kook.
> I move then you move... Like chess... HTH
>
> I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock... kook-watch says K0oks use
> sockpuppets.
It says that kooks use sock puppets to respond to themselves. and
bolster their own arguments. There are non kooky reasons to use
sock puppets. Staying anonymous when dealing with net psychos like
you is just one example.
> Case closed, k0oks.
>
> http://know_buddy.tripod.com
>
>
>>>MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
>>>
>>>--
>>>Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
>>>
>>>test test test
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>test
>>>
>>>test
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>test
>>
>>You failed.
>
>
> I wasn't testing *me*.
I was.
> Try again,
Ok, you fail again.
> k0ok.... [test] You'll see that you pass the test with flying
> colors every time. You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it when all you had
> to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say. TEST
>
>
>>You're still a kook. HTH.
>
>
> ^test^
>
> (test 1234)
>
> test test test {}
>
> test foo("test");
>
> <test>HTH</test>
>
> You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible. Would base64 be better?
>
>
>>
>>--
>>The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
>>http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
>>http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
>>Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
>>
>>"I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
>
>
> (((test]]]
>
> --
> Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
>
> *test*
Yet another great meltdown! You go, kook
Support
Robert Wolfe
> In his never ending quest to demonstrate to everyone that
> combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking with
> a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
>
> > Michael Davis wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In his never ending quest
> >
> >
> > You know what rhymes with quest?
> >
> > TEST
> >
> >
> >>to demonstrate to everyone that
> >>combining mental illness, sheer stupidity and heavy drinking
> >
> >
> > ...and I couldn't have done it without Mike: The drunken, stupid, psycho.
> >
> >
> >>with
> >>a Usenet account is a *very* bad thing, Robert Wolfe wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > ...some stuff that Mike couldn't have possibly avoided reading.
>
> You post stuff to an open forum in the hope that people *won't*
> read it??? That's kooky!
What's kooky is how you claim I'm a dangerous person, and then you belong to a club that likes to go RL on people that they don't like.
>
>
> >
> >
> >>>Pete Charest wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:11:18 GMT, Robert Wolfe <car...@swbell.not>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>jof3r wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On or about Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:08:02 GMT, it was decided that Robert
> >>>>>>Wolfe <me...@SPexaAMmple.com> typed:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>*Transveti-snippage*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Hey, bitch-bastard. What's up? Did your (gay, gender-confused) ass
> >>>>>>ever heal from that spnaking?
> >>>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Could you point us to *any* evidence of said "spnaking"???
> >>
> >>Your meltdowns. HTH.
> >
> >
> > I thought you believe I do that by default, no matter what. Every fucking message I send, you
> > claim is a meltdown.
>
> Well...Yeah. Just look at them. Normal people don't post the sort
> of frothy idiocy you do.
>
You call yourself normal and see below the example of you (once again) doing exactly what you claim I have done. I must be normal.
>
> > I think it's projection by you, IMO.
>
> The opinions of the mentally ill are irrelevant.
>
Projection.
>
> >
> > ...but what about the meltdown you and Carl have had ongoing since I sent Jennifer "childmisery"
> > Wilson that email she asked for on usenet? Has it been 2 years yet? She *was* like 5 years old
> > when I sent it, right? Last I checked, between proving that Johnny is a Pre-vert and sending
> > Misery that email, I was met with k0ok-complaints from a Carl Wilson of Lawton, Okla-homo dressed
> > up in a "j watson" sockpuppet, and lawsuit threats from John Lewis, private jeweler and appraiser
> > in the Dallas fort worth area. That doesn't even explain why Carl found himself sending Pitt
> > complaint emails before I even started doing anything in retaliation. Pitt responds telling Carl
> > that he's a k0ok and he can't EVER stop me from saying things he doesn't like to hear. They
> > suggested that he not respond to or even read my messages if he wanted to avoid melting down and
> > making k0ok comaplaints. Did he do that, Mike?
>
> You still don't get it. You are the problem, Roberta. Blaming your
> victims is just another symptom of your mental illness.
>
Projection.
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>Thought not. HAND
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>"Rick Boston got a kooky quote archive
> >>>>>>and all I got was this lousy gender issue." R. Wolfe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hi, it's your daddy... I like to poast as Roberta, Jenny:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>RobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRobertaRoberta
> >>>>>etc... etc... etc....
> >>>>
> >>>>Gotta hand it to you J....Less than an hour from your post here and
> >>>>you've got Bobbie Wolfie melting down very nicely.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I know someone else who we'll see melting down... A french-fag named Charest who thinks his
> >>>urine and BO soaked relatives were here during the Revolution.
> >>
> >>I thought you ultra-liberal, anti-war, disloyal, America-hating,
> >>hypocritical, kooks all loved the French these days.
> >
> >
> > You think you know me or something,
>
> Yeah.
>
Not.
>
> > k0ok? If there's a draft, I'm sure your fat, rolly-polly ass
> > will get to stay at home,
>
> Well, they don't take cross-dressing queers or the mentally ill
> either, so you've got *two* outs, Mr. Hypocrisy.
>
They probably wouldn't take a pacifist commie.
>
> > so no wonder there why you could care less if we were at war with every
> > *other* country not having anything to do with WTC (besides Iraq, that is).
>
> The war with Iraq is not about the 9/11 attacks. We had plenty of
> other reasons to go into Iraq, and it was way over-due.
>
And timed PERFECTLY... I thought we wanted to "focus" on terrorism? GW just wanted to get even for his daddy... 90% of the world sees it that way.
>
> >
> >
> >>Anyway, since
> >>the French were on our side during the Revolution, it is just
> >>possible that you have Pete's ancestors to thank for your right to
> >>be a raving net loon.
> >
> >
> > I'm sure I don't. Do you think that the redcoats wearing RED COATS in the middle of a damn
> > battle, had much to do with it?
>
> They managed to conquer a world-straddling empire in those get-ups.
>
Hey! Thanks to them we have the third world. Funny that "world-straddling empire" was defeated once by a tiny frail old man named Ghandi.
>
> > Joe Bloue is supposedly an artillery and munitions expert...
> > What's the maximum effective range of the weapons they were using, "Joe"? Does Joe understand
> > how much more visible a soldier wearing any amount of the color red is in *any* environment
> > (except maybe the painted desert and Death valley)? Do you, Mike?
>
> I know how inaccurate the weapons of the day were. What they wore
> made little difference.
Wouldn't you have to be closer to your enemy? ...and wouldn't that mean if they were wearing RED, you'd be able to see them that much better?
> The difference in tactics is what decided
> the outcome of the war.
>
Nice 360 degree spin.
>
> >
> >
> >>You should thank him. After all, Mad King
> >>George III would never have put up with the likes of you.
> >
> >
> > He had something against those who weren't alive until centuries later? Maybe he had a problem
> > with those Austrian Jews who came to the US to escape Hitler so they could kill themselves mining
> > coal and making the steel to be used in war machinery? ...
>
> I think you just Godwined yourself.
>
I think you just whined about something...
>
> > or maybe the inbreeding just made him
> > insane? What was your damn point again, k0ok? A dead, insane, syphillic King hates me, now?
> > Are you drinking a lot of mercury, as of late?
> >
> > Besides, my dad has a purple heart from vietnam... "Big Red 1"... I'll thank him first for his
> > sacrifice,
>
> But you won't emulate him.
Why need I "emulate" him? He also broke his back for 25 years in a coal mine, only to be told the mine was going to be closed and flooded. He doesn't expect me to do that. He's quite proud that
I have the position I do. He'd also be quite proud that I took no shit from you losers.
> You must be a great disappointment to
> him.
See above...
> He may as well have had a daughter.
>
He did. Funny, that.
>
> > and next for petitioning his represenatives the second he heard any rumors about Uncle
> > Scam wanting to start up the draft. My dad is also intelligent enough to realize that Saddam
> > Hussien hasn't even been proven to be involved with the WTC incident.
>
> So what?
>
You and Harlow can't make the connection.
>
> > He might have voted for
> > Dubya, though... Oh well... he lost fair and square in PA. If only they knew how to count in
> > Florida.
>
> We do. Dubbya won in Florida. HTH.
>
I thought all of those jewish grandmas voted for McCain?
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>It's a talent, definitely.
> >>>>
> >>>>Pete Charest
> >>>>KookSpotter
> >>>>If you're not insulted, you're not a kook.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yeah... Like how Carl and Mike have been melting since I emailed "Miss Misery" herself.
> >>>
> >>>Imagine what they would do if I poasted the link to Carl Jr's Yahoo profile here?
> >>
> >>Threatening to stalk *another* child, Roberta?
> >
> >
> > How is asking Carl a question a "threat", exactly?
>
> Damn, your reading comprehension sucks even when you are parsing
> your own drivel.
>
What are you even talking about? is your davisizer on the fritz?
>
> >
> > Couple other questions, k0ok: How exactly does one "threaten to stalk"?
>
> See above.
>
> > How is providing a
> > google link "stalking"?
>
> Dragging in non-combatants, and children at that, is clearly
> stalking. Any non psycho can see that.
See this, then:
"From: "Garry Bryan" <garr...@pacbell.net>
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.usenet.kooks
References: <3eb9f...@news.meganetnews.com> <10524088...@cswreg.cos.agilent.com> <3EBA8360...@frontiernet.net> <10524133...@cswreg.cos.agilent.com>
<3ebae4e7$1...@news.meganetnews.com> <gC9va.141$%M1.20...@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com> <3ebf14c7$1...@news.meganetnews.com>
Subject: Re: More Garrrry wedding photos
Lines: 273
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <QWWva.584$OL2.55...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.121.88.20
X-Complaints-To: ab...@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr21.news.prodigy.com 1052785456 ST000 67.121.88.20 (Mon, 12 May 2003 20:24:16 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:24:16 EDT
Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com
X-UserInfo1:
T[O]R^OGGJPWB_LZNCOF_W\@PJ_^PBQLGPQRJRQIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:24:16 GMT
"Michael Davis" <mdav...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3ebf14c7$1...@news.meganetnews.com...
> Notorious net kook and utter ignoramus Garrrry "Always Wrong"
> Bryan wrote:
>
> ---Snip ---
>
> >
> > It is certainly nice to see that you had the right to make such a
choice; to
> > reject, accept or ignore any ridicule or parody that you were involved
in.
>
> As does everyone.
. .. when they are allowed to be informed of said ridicule or parody. . .
>
> > What you conviently overlook at that your ridicule of me brought in 2nd
and
> > 3rd parties. . .
>
> That's because it's irrelevant. HTH.
Denail noted. . .it is relevent and the whole reason your sites got pulled.
. .everyone involved has teh right to decide if they want to be a part of
your obsession with me. . .except in the case of an 18 month old child, that
is the parents call. . .
>
> > in the case of an 18 month old child it is commonly accepted
> > that they do not have the ability to make a reasoned choice. This is
when
> > their family is involved, and they chose to have your site shut down. .
.in
> > regards to other who felt that your use of their material or images was
> > inappropriate, so they had your site shut down. . .
>
> Oh just admit you did it and quit trying to pass the buck, kook.
Quit trying to avoid the issue of your behavior, freak. . .
>
> > see the difference
> > between you and me is that I believe that rights belong to everyone
>
> Except me apparently. Hypocrisy noted.
You have the right to your opinions and free speech EXCEPT when it infringes
on another persons rights. . .or you violate your TOS agreement. . .
>
> > and
> > should be protected, particularly if they are unable to protect them for
> > themselves,
>
> Translation: You are a self-appointed, wannabe netkop.
Translation: Nobody means anything to me except as a plaything. . .
Face it Mikey, you stepped over the line and used a child in your obsession
and that is not allowed without consent.
>
> > while you think that rights only apply to you. . .
>
> I know they apply to me, and I am going to continue to exercise
> them, at your expense.
And you will continue to be stopped when you violate others rights. . .
>
> >
> > I also
> >
> >>think that site says a lot more about the author than it does
> >>about me.
> >
> >
> > Agreed. . you are one ruthless son of a bitch that will not let rights,
> > children, women or even your own word to use a website in compliance
with
> > the TOS get in the way of proving how sociopathic you are. . ..
>
> Well, if you really agreed, you wouldn't thrown a fit and got the
> sites pulled. Lying noted.
I didn't. . .lying noted. . .there were children who needed their rights
protected. . .it's obvious you don't have children and let's hope it stays
that way, for their sake. . .
>
> >
> > Besides, I know his whole purpose in making the site was
> >
> >>to get a rise out of me.
> >
> >
> > and you only. ..
> >
> > So I ignore it.
> >
> > Great that you have that freedom and priviledge to do so. . .
>
> As does everyone. Kooks like you though are incapable of shrugging
> off anything that you think attacks your credibility. But the
> funny thing is, you have no credibility to begin with. So your
> actions just make you look like even more of a kook. Quite a kooky
> downward spiral you are caught up in, Garrrry.
So you admit you like to pick on kooks? Or is it just children? Total
strangers? What's next, lighting homeless on fire and laughing as they
"froth" trying to put themselves out?
>
> > but it also
> > extends to others. . .
> >
> > That frustrates the
> >
> >>author more than any other response would. Besides, like they say
> >>in Hollywood, the only bad press is no press at all.
> >
> >
> > Hollywood, Florida?
>
> No, California. You know, the land of fruits and nuts where you live.
I don't live in LA . . .that is another country as far as I am concerned. .
.
>
> > But what if you don't want any press?
>
> You've made yourself a celebrity.
I don't buy into your megalomania, Mikey, that is your pathetic projection.
. ..
>As with any other celebrity, you
> and the people around you are fair game.
Lame attempt to justify your actions. . .
>You don't get a choice,
> your opinion is irrelevant and your wining is just more grist for
> the mill. This is your 15 minutes of fame, Garrrry. Too bad your
> claim to fame is as a kook though. You really should have tried
> harder.
>
> > You have served as
> > an example of the worst side of the internet
>
> Right up there with spammers, con artists, kiddy porn peddlers and
> identity thieves?
So since murders exiast it's "OK to abuse children? Fucked up logic there
Mikey and it doesn't relieve you of your respobsibility
>Your sense of proportion is seriously screwed
> up, kook. Just because it was you I parodied doesn't make it a big
> issue.
That never was the issue, but you are to thickheaded and anal to understnad
that. . .
>Get over yourself already.
Seems you are the one who needs to get over me. . .oh, obsessed one. . ..
>
> You are going to be good for a few more entries in my "What is a
> Kook?" page on kook-watch.net. I had overlooked some of the
> classic kook traits you are displaying when I originally put
> together the page.
>
> 1. Skewed sense of proportion.
> 2. Calling your critics pedophiles.
> 3. Intolerance of anything that questions your nonexistent
> credibility.
1) Your denial doesn't make it skewed
2) Your behaviour shows an ability to use children to satisfy your needs. .
.where it stops is a matter of personal choice. . .
3) Never was intolerant of your obsessive ridicule, jsut your lack of
concern for innocent persons. . .
>
> > to various people,
>
> Who would they be?
Read again, you have been told many times. . .
>
> > so you have
> > affected peoples behavior and proven that sick people do prowl the
internet.
>
> Yes, and the way I have affected your behavior shows you to be
> quite sick. Have you noticed that nobody here seems to be on your
> side? I wonder why that is?
Because no one wants to get close to you and your illness, except your kook
buddies. . .I don't need to have sock puppets and "secret club" meeting s to
plan my support like you and the YAHOO guys do. . .
>
> > . ..
> >
> >
> >>Not that I expect a kook like you to understand. You'll keep
> >>dancing for my entertainment as I pull your strings because you're
> >>one of the most gullible and stupid people I have ever run across.
> >>I don't expect you to ever learn.
> >
> >
> > Nor do I expect you to stop denying your behavior. ..
>
> What have I denied?
Everything. . .you used a minor child, an innocent adult and copyrighted
material in your game all of which is a violation of the TOS and in the
former case, possibly criminal. . .
>
> > you can believe that
> > it is humorous to watch people react to your sociopathic behavior and
> > project that there is something wrong with that. . . .
>
> Actually it is all the people laughing at you that makes me
> believe it is humorous. HTH.
That is a total of one, you. . .oh, and your sockpuppets and AUK buddies. .
.
>
> > you were poorly
> > socialized as a child, that is certain, and you continue to act it out
as an
> > adult. . .
>
> Thanks for the projection filled, bullshit diagnosis, Dr. Fraud.
Thansk for the expected denial. . .now dance some more for me, sociopath. .
.
>
> > you need a new .sig. .
> >
> >
> >>The Feral Michael Davis(tm)
> >
> > HTH
>
> Feral is the opposite of tame. But I am tame Garrrry. You should
> branch out and try posting your bullshit to some other groups I
> could recommend.
Why?
>Some groups are in a real state of war and
> shit-stupid kooks like you are the cannon fodder. Idiots like you
> get chewed up and spit out by people who have been destroying
> kooks since Usenet was new. You will soon long for the good old
> days when you only had to deal with tame, little old, me.
Fantasy noted. . .
Garry"
Remember that, Mike?
Remember when you dragged an 18 month old into your "combat" (as you like to project) with Garry? Why "combat"? You really think this is "combat"?
I'll be awaiting your frothy <SNIP> of all of this...
Loser.
>
>
> >
> > Carl has every right to protect his little babies
>
> Why do you think he filed a complaint against you?
http://skepticult.org/digger/altparfaq.html
"Kooks will do practically anything to suppress opposing points of
view. Tactics include, but are not limited to:
munging addresses
ditto follow-ups
threats of lawsuits
ditto violence
ditto stalking
complaining to:
ISPs
Law enforcement agencies
Usenet admins
In short, nothing is too far out for a kook to try in order to keep
the voices of those who have the temerity to oppose them quiet."
???
>
>
> > by telling them to not poast their life stories
> > online. I'm sure that Carl will one day find himself face to face with a verified dangerous
> > criminal if he continues with the sorts of activities he enjoys doing here and elsewhere online.
>
> You are going to visit him in person?
>
>
> > Maybe he'll eventually thank me for having brought this sort of thing to his attention ahead of
> > time.
>
> Typical psycho-think.
Calling yourself a psycho?
>
>
> >
> >
> >>Some kooks just
> >>never learn.
> >>
> >
> >
> > What, exactly, did I *learn* from sending Childmisery that email?
>
> Nothing, obviously.
>
Nooo... I learned that you guys are all k0oks.
>
> > Besides her daddy was a
> > verifiable net.k0ok.
>
> You are not her father, you are just her stalker.
>
And when was the last time I "stalked" her? Which judge ruled this?
Why do you need to ask the odds... You already know who Carl is and who he isn't.
More evidence that you are trying to blow smoke up everybodys ass.
>
> > Note the progression of "Joe's"
> > Headers from this point on toward more anonymity... Note that he showed up a few days after
> > Carl's "test" message...which he seems to have *canceled* yesterday for some reason (not even in
> > google anymore). Note that he was also recently trolled by a poast with the subject "Whatever
> > happened to Carl Wilson?". Another good indicator is the fact that you are acting so
> > nonchalantly. Usually you flip out completely when I play the sockpuppet accusation game
> > knowingly feeding you incorrect information. (You thought I was just stupid, huh?)
>
> No, I always knew you were so much more than just stupid.
>
Much more, as in your obsession.
>
> > Your
> > reaction this time points to a different scenario. Gotta love misdirection, eh?
>
> What reaction?
>
You obviously should know who Carl is poasting as, dopey. You should be able to tell me I'm wrong with confidence. You can't though.
>
> >
> > One can also ask the following questions:
> >
> > Has Joe ever denied being Carl?
>
> Have you ever denied stuffing small rodents up your rectum?
>
Just answer the question.
>
> > Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?
>
> Like you have?
>
Has Carl ever used sockpuppets before?
>
> > Why are you so *sure* it
> > isn't Carl?
>
> I never claimed it either is or isn't Carl.
>
How can you not know who he is?
>
> > Why is Michael Davis asking for proof,
>
> That's what debunkers do. HTH.
>
Shouldn't you have some proof that it isn't Carl. Shouldn't you be crying that he *only* uses Supernews? Why aren't you? You must have heard that his Supernews account got yanked. Did Carl just
forget to mention that he'd be poasting as a Sock after that happened?
>
> > when you'd expect Joe Bloue to be the first
> > needing an explanation for such an "incorrect" assumption(if he really *wasn't* Carl, that is)?
>
> Or if he has no idea who Carl is and is used to paranoid kooks
> accusing him of being random people who don't post here anymore.
Prove that Carl hasn't poasted here, K0ok.
>
> See, there is always more than one possible explanation for
> something.
Not according to you. You deny several possible explinations with any you present.
> You saucer heads just can't seem to grasp that.
>
> >
> > So I guess, you could call all of that my supporting evidence as to why I hypothesize that Joe
> > Bloue is Carl...
>
> You misspelled "fantasize."
>
> > Along with more support that you guys will surely give out unknowingly. Why do
> > you even bother to set up private clubs like you guys do, when they don't even help you avoid
> > getting caught up in your own stupid lies and games?
>
> It's not private. Anyone can join. We just charge psychos like you
> annual dues of $50000 to cover the potential liability. Send me a
> check (a good one) for the above amount and I'll hook you up.
>
Why would I want to join? I grew up at some point and don't feel a need to prove myself weak enough to need a gang of people behind me to defend my position.
>
> >
> >
> >>>What gives? I thought you wanted to play some more k0ok games?
> >>
> >>You are the only one I see playing kook games, kook.
> >>
> >
> >
> > ...and you're sooo surprised to see them because you are downloading them, reading them, and
> > responding to them.
>
> Yep, it's still an open, public forum. Why you are surprised that
> people read and respond to you is beyond me, but then I'm not a kook.
>
Denail noted.
>
> > I move then you move... Like chess... HTH
> >
> > I see Carl using a sock... I see Johnny Lewis using a sock... kook-watch says K0oks use
> > sockpuppets.
>
> It says that kooks use sock puppets to respond to themselves. and
> bolster their own arguments. There are non kooky reasons to use
> sock puppets.
So even *you* could have used one?
> Staying anonymous when dealing with net psychos like
> you is just one example.
>
Then why aren't any of you guys anonymous? I'll tell you why... It's because you can't stand not being recognized for your "work".
>
> > Case closed, k0oks.
> >
> > http://know_buddy.tripod.com
> >
> >
> >>>MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
> >>>
> >>>--
> >>>Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> >>>
> >>>test test test
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>test
> >>
> >>You failed.
> >
> >
> > I wasn't testing *me*.
>
> I was.
>
You were testing *you*, too?
>
> > Try again,
>
> Ok, you fail again.
>
Fail what?
>
> > k0ok.... [test] You'll see that you pass the test with flying
> > colors every time. You'll continue to do this ad-nauseum, and complain about it when all you had
> > to do was just *try* to avoid hearing what I have to say. TEST
> >
> >
> >>You're still a kook. HTH.
> >
> >
> > ^test^
> >
> > (test 1234)
> >
> > test test test {}
> >
> > test foo("test");
> >
> > <test>HTH</test>
> >
> > You're still responding to things you claim are unintelligible. Would base64 be better?
> >
> >
> >>
> >>--
> >>The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> >>http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> >>http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> >>Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
> >>
> >>"I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
> >
> >
> > (((test]]]
> >
> > --
> > Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?
> >
> > *test*
>
> Yet another great meltdown! You go, kook
>
You meltdown like a sta-puft in a campfire, fatso.
>
> --
> The Evil Michael Davis(tm)
> http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/
> http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536
> Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club
>
> "I have no clue" - Roberta Wolfe in a rare moment of honesty.
--
Hace you fa0m!!!!!!!ll!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!?