Would it not, Dr Chan, be better just to ask people who refuse to
wear a surgical mask if there is, indeed, a real danger of a pandemic?
Why force through a vaccination on pain of being shot? The legal
situation is that anyone who refuses the vaccine, and/or resists
forced relocation to a prepared "quarantine compound", can "legally"
be shot and killed. (Justified "deadly force".) See
http://www.forhealthfreedom.org/Publications/Informed/RevisedModelState.html
You must be aware of this facts. This is such a drastic scenario
that you in your capacity as a public servant must have real evidence
of a dire threat to the population and be prove beyond a doubt that
your actions will address that threat and that there is a good
reason why you don't simply recommend people were surgical masks
if they don't want to take the vaccination. From media reports,
it seems that the new strain of swine flu is a synthetic structural
recombinant, it contains genes from birds, humans, and pigs from
many different continents. It therefore is reasonable to assume it
came out of a laboratory, specifically a bioweapons laboratory.
Wouldn't the WHO be better advised to investigate the lab that
manufactured and released this synthetic virus and prosecute them
or else recommend people wear surgical masks rather than declare a
mass vaccination programme? According to a report in Fox News below,
your assessment of the dangers of this swine flu is by far the most
pessimistic with the CDC recommending just customary precautions.
How do you explain that? How do explain why you have identified so
many fatalities already while the Mexican government has confirmed
only 16 from this new flu strain? What is the scientific basis for
your identification? Are you using a correct procedure? Can you
prove it in court that you are using the correct procedure and that
simply recommending people wear surgical masks is not adequate.
Also, I note that the new strain of the swine flu has appeared in
Mexico and America simultaneously, and under "mysterious circumstances"
also indicating a deliberate, planned and coordinated release of
the synthetic laboratory engineered viruses. Shouldn't you be
investigating such a "mysterious" incident? Have you declared an
investigation? Who are you investigating? Please give details? WHO
is obliged to exhaust all other avenues before declaring a pandemic
and initiating a mass vaccination programme because you must -- as
part of your duties to be informed as the holder of such an office
-- know that the 1976 swine flu mass vaccination programme was
abandoned by the US government because of the mounting evidence
that the risk to the general public was greater from the vaccination
programme than from the actual swine flu. It is your especial duty,
given this precedent in 1976, to make sure no mass vaccination
programme is implemented unless that causes injury to the general
public is implemented under your auspices by your declaring a
pandemic prematurely and without having adequate safeguards in place
to ensure the high quality and safety of any vaccine material. You
also need to show that recommending surgical masks is not a viable
alternative approach in dealing with any so-called pandemic. I
contend that you are not fulfilling your duty to a) provide accurate
information to the public about the threats posed to them by the
swine flu and b) to ensure you do not declare a pandemic prematurely
as a pretext to rush through a contaminated or faulty vaccine
material that could result in death or injury to people as happened
in 1976. As a public servant whose body is currently investigation
the involvement of Baxter and Avir in the release of bird flu
pandemic material in Austria, you are obliged to be fully aware
also of the details of this case and the role that a pharmaceutical
company, namely Baxter, played in almost triggering a pandemic. You
might also be aware of the criminal charges I filed against Baxter
and other bodies, including the WHO, in respect of this case on
April 8th with the Vienna City Prosecutor since they are available
on a blog.
The WHO reference center provided Baxter with the particularly
lethal wild type bird flu virus that ended up contaminating ordinary
human flu material and being distributed to 16 laboratories in
Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany under a false
label, and so nearly sparking a bird flu pandemic this winter in
the estimation of experts and the media. Virus mix-up by lab could
have resulted in pandemic (6 Mar
2009)http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4230882.cms In
the Baxter case of this winter, there is therefore a clear, well
documented link between WHO and the release of pandemic bird flu
material in Europe this winter. The WHO is, according to reports,
conducting an investigation into Baxter and Avir's role in producing
and distributing this material, but has so far not made public the
results of its investigation or made recommendations in respect of
stricter biosecurity rules for laboratories working with the highly
pathogenic bird flu virus. Why not? I contend your failure to conduct
a full and detailed investigation into this incident, and to make
those findings public or to make clear recommendations as to how
to prevent a repeat of this incident is not merely a failure to
perform your duty as a public servant but evidence of your role in
covering up the real origin of the pandemic virus, specifically,
in WHO's own reference center. In my criminal charges filed with
the Vienna City Prosecutor on April 8th, 2009, I alleged that Baxter
deliberately tried to trigger a pandemic with the aim of profiting
from it by sealing in advance lucrative contracts to supply a
vaccination for the bird flu with the Austrian Health Ministry in
2006, specifically the contract sealed with Austrian Health Minister
Maria Rauch-Kallat involved supplying 16 million vaccine shots in
the event that WHO declared a bird flu pandemic. In Germany, a
vaccination bird flu shot is mandatory ensuring more profits for
pharmaceutical companies, and adding to the motivation for companies
to trigger a pandemic because they will profit from it, and to take
steps to exercise undue influence on members of WHO to declare a
pandemic without adequate reason. Referring to laws on racketeering
influenced crime organisations, I argued that high offices in
organisations such as the WHO have been annexed by criminal elements
who are actually helping to further a criminal agenda of committing
murder with the motive of robbery - albeit using covert bioweapons
programmes. As a result of the actions of Baxter, at least 35 people
in Austria and in the Czech Republic were given preventative treatment
against bird flu and the ordinary human flu in hospital. This
underlines that in the professional opinion of the medical personnel
there was a real, concrete and specific danger from Baxter and WHO's
contaminated material to the health of those individuals, such that
administering medicines was considered necessary. I understand the
Czech laboratory staff who came into contact with Baxter's contaminated
and who first reported it on February 6th material were placed in
quarantine. Given the fact that this incident happened only a few
weeks ago and your organisation is involved in it in as far as it
supplied a) a lethal strain of the bird flu virus and b) is
investigating the incident, it is your duty to be aware of all
details, allegations of criminal intent, evidence for those allegations
and refutations of those allegations because there are so many
parallels with this new "swine flu" case, also involving a synthetic
structure that has mysteriously appeared in two places simultaneously.
In particular, you are obliged to be informed about the fact that
Baxter uses biosafety level 3 regulations when handling the highly
pathogenic bird flu virus that WHO sent the company from its reference
center, and that under these biosafety 3 regulations an accidental
contamination of the deadly bird flu virus strain you sent you're
your reference center to Baxter with a human flu is virtually
impossible. You must also be aware of the research of Jeffery K.
Taubenberger of the Department of Molecular Pathology, Armed Forces
Institute of Pathology into the bird flu virus and specifically his
reconstruction of the deadly strain of the bird flu virus from the
genetic material retrieved from victims of the Spanish flu pandemic
of 1918-1919. Although many researchers and NGOs issued warnings
that resurrecting this lethal virus was dangerous to the public,
the WHO has been one of the biggest supporters of continuing research
into this bioengineered virus and into its "antidotes" spending
millions of tax payers dollars on research and prevention programmes.
You must be aware that it was only last summer that scientists
published in scientific journals evidence that showed that the bird
flu can mix with the human flu virus to produce a pandemic virus
in a laboratory situation. You must also be aware of the ongoing
criminal investigation in Poland into the deaths of homeless people
after they were given a bird flu trial vaccination by doctors and
nurses last summer. There is therefore, I argue, ample evidence
within the public domain to show that pharmaceutical companies and
government organisations and other agents are knowingly and
intentionally creating pandemic virus material and, as we saw in
Austria, this winter unleashing it on the population, and trying
to cover up their involvement. Should you and WHO now declare a
pandemic for the swine flu in the USA, and should people die as a
direct result of the vaccination programme you initiate, or should
there be significant evidence of harm or injury to people as a
direct result of the mass vaccination programme you initiate, as
happened in 1976, you could find yourself charged not with a
conspiracy to mass murder but with mass murder itself. Furthermore,
the WHO, as far as I am informed, has published a study outlining
the economic impact of a pandemic virus. If you as part of your
office help criminal organisations who have annexed high offices
of state to carry out their crimes, to ignite and then declare a
pandemic, that disrupts the economy, then you, other leading
individuals working for WHO in an official capacity and WHO, as an
organisation, could also liable not only for criminal charges but
also for damages flowing from class action lawsuits filed not just
by citizens of American but by citizens or company around the world
that see their revenues decline as a direct result of the pandemic
being unleashed, and the subsequent havoc to the economy. If there
is a pandemic declaration by WHO and mass deaths from the vaccination
programme, I foresee a situation were you and the WHO could find
thousands of people are filing criminal charges but also class
action law suits. I contend there is evidence from the pattern of
your activities concerning the Baxter case that you, under the color
of your office while purporting to act in an official capacity, are
actually acting on behalf of hidden crime interests intent on
igniting a pandemic and misusing a declaration of a pandemic to
gain political and financial advantages, a group which I designate
as the Illuminati crime gang. The declaration of a pandemic by WHO
has direct political and financial and other advantages to elements
in the US government, especially elements I argue belong to the
Illuminati/New World Order/CIA/Freemason crime gang, who are now
being considered for investigation for sanctioning torture in
Guantanamo in violation of the US and international law, specifically
Donald Rumsfeld (who has financial connections with an anti bird
flu Tamiflu producer), Richard Cheney and Alberto Gonzales.
The imposition of martial law will help anyone suspected of violating
laws to torture to avoid prosecution in the United States, although
a case is pending in Spain. I contend that you are abusing your
office as Director General of WHO, knowingly and intentionally, to
help the Illuminati achieve their political and financial goals. I
contend there is already today, Saturday, evidence that you are
intentionally manipulating information on the swine flu outbreak
that allegedly started yesterday to play up the danger of a pandemic
in order to justify the implementation of a mass vaccination programme
while ignoring and suppressing information that indicates this
response is not proportionate to the risk. Finally, I ask you to
please provide me by Monday 10am April 27th Central European Time
in the form of email attachments, links, legal memos etc the following
documentation so that I can review it before submitting fresh
criminal charges related to this matter. Specifically, I ask you
to send me or to instruct one of your personnel to send me 1) The
studies you have to date on the swine flu vaccination you intend
to inoculate the US population with, with clear evidence from
respected scientific sources such as clinical trials reported in
peer reviewed scientific journals as to their unequivocal safety:
2) Information as to the genetic sequence of the swine flu strain
detected by WHO in victims of the "swine flu" outbreak in Mexico
and America so far; 3) Information as to which companies WHO has
contracted to provide a swine flu vaccination and under what terms
and conditions, including quality assurance, financial terms and
conditions; 4) A detailed account of all the safety procedures and
independent reviews that WHO has put into place for ensuring any
vaccination meets recognised standards of safety and quality;
5) Documents proving that you have the legal authority in the case
of a swine flu to declare a pandemic and enforce mass vaccinations
for the swine flu on the population in the form of legal memos,
rulings etc. Please send all the above documents as email attachments.
If you miss the Monday deadline, I will argue in my submission to
the court that you do not have the documents. I ask you to make
sure you keep a copy of the email to me so that you can prove to a
court that you a) had all the requisite authority and documents and
b) that you had them at hand and available for public and legal
scrutiny at short notice in an emergency situation as is your
obligation as a public servant. I will argue that if you have ordered
your WHO officers to man the pandemic control room 24/7 from Friday
April 24, as reported in the media, then you have an extra obligation
to be on duty yourself this weekend and your failure to be on duty
in the event of an emergency you have declared is a violation of
the rules of conduct of your office. As you have sufficient personnel
at hand, I will argue, you can delegate this job of collecting the
documents and materials I request in 1)-5) to a member of your staff
and still be available to follow the "pandemic" which you claim is
occurring. If you send me these documents after the Monday deadline,
please make sure to keep a copy of the email so that you can prove
in a court of law that you had the necessary authority, and documents
proving you had that authority at hand, and could present them
speedily as is required of a public servant in such an "emergency".
In case you wish to study the criminal charges I have filed on April
8th and wish to be able to better comprehend the legal basis for
the criminal charges that I will file on Monday April the 27th, I
attach a copy in German. I can also suggest my blog where I have
published the charges in an English translation, though only the
first 20 pages or so have so far been translated.
http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/ The introduction on the blog,
however, also gives an outline of my evidence and arguments. I am
also copying in below two media reports that give substance to some
of the allegations I make in this email, underlining relevant points,
including the information indicating this new strain of a swine flu
could be a bioweapon "mysteriously"
released. If you have any comments or would like to point out any
facts you think are errors please get back to me as soon as possible.
I would be happy to answer any questions. Regards, Jane <> <> <>
<> <> <> <> <> Two relevant reports one from yesterday from Fox
News and one concerning the 1976 swine flu incident: From:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,517737,00.html Mexico Links
Sickness, Deaths to Swine Flu April 24 Mexico City closed schools
across the metropolis of 20 million Friday after at least 16 people
died and more than 900 others fall ill from what health officials
suspect is a new strain of swine flu. World health officials worried
that it could mark the start of a flu pandemic. The World Health
Organization in Geneva, Switzerland said at least 57 have died in
the outbreak, although it wasn't yet clear if this larger number
of deaths was due to swine flu. "We are very, very concerned,"
said Thomas Abraham, a spokesman for the agency. "We have what
appears to be a novel virus and it has spread from human to human."
If international spread is confirmed, that meets WHO's criteria for
raising the pandemic alert level, he added. Abraham said WHO on
Friday raised their internal alert system, allowing them to divert
more money and personnel to dealing with the outbreak. "It's all
hands on deck at the moment." Abraham said. Mexico's Health Secretary,
Jose Cordova, said only 16 of the deaths have been confirmed to
have been caused by the new strain, through testing at the government's
laboratories.
Samples from 44 other people who died were still being tested. The
health department put the total number of people sickened at around
943 nationwide.
Cordova said samples were sent to the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, to determine whether
it's the same virus infecting seven people in Texas and California.
As of now, tests show the flu is a "new, different strain ... that
originally came from pigs." "We certainly have 60 deaths that we
can't be sure are from the same virus, but it is probable," Cordova
told MVS radio in Mexico City. Cordova described a chilling new
strain that had killed only people among the normally less-vulnerable
young and mid-adult age range. One possibility is that the most
vulnerable segments of the population - infants and the aged - had
been vaccinated against other strains, and that those vaccines may
be providing some protection. But Dr. Anne Schuchat of the CDC said
"at this point, we do not have any confirmations of swine influenza
in Mexico" of the kind that sickened seven California and Texas
residents. All seven U.S. victims recovered from a strain of the
flu that combines pig, bird and human viruses in a way that researchers
have not seen before. Cordova also told MVS radio in Mexico City
that Mexican health officials can't be sure that the deaths "are
from the same virus, but it is probable." Closing the schools kept
6.1 million students home from day care centers through high schools,
and thousands more were affected as colleges and universities closed
down. Parents scrambled to juggle work and family concerns due to
what local media said was the first citywide schools closure since
Mexico City's devastating 1985 earthquake. Lillian Molina and other
teachers at the Montessori's World preschool scrubbed down their
empty classrooms with Clorox, soap and Lysol on Friday between
fielding calls from worried parents. While the school has had no
known cases among its students, Molina supported the government's
decision to shutter classes, especially in preschools. "It's great
they are taking precautions," she said. "I think it's a really good
idea." Authorities advised capital residents not to go to work if
they felt ill, and to wear surgical masks if they had to move through
crowds. A wider shutdown - perhaps including shutting down government
offices - was being considered. "It is very likely that classes
will be suspended for several days," Cordova said. "We will have
to evaluate, and let's hope this doesn't happen, the need to restrict
activity at workplaces." Still, U.S.
health officials said it's not yet a reason for alarm in the United
States.
The five in California and two in Texas have all recovered, and
testing indicates some common antiviral medications seem to work
against the virus.
Schuchat of the CDC said officials believe the new strain can spread
human-to-human, which is unusual for a swine flu virus. The CDC is
checking people who have been in contact with the seven confirmed
U.S. cases, who all became ill between late March and mid-April.
The U.S. cases are a growing medical mystery because it's unclear
how they caught the virus. The CDC said none of the seven people
were in contact with pigs, which is how people usually catch swine
flu. And only a few were in contact with each other. CDC officials
described the virus as having a unique combination of gene segments
not seen in people or pigs before. The bug contains human virus,
avian virus from North America and pig viruses from North America,
Europe and Asia. Health officials have seen mixes of bird, pig and
human virus before, but never such an intercontinental combination
with more than one pig virus in the mix.
Scientists keep a close eye on flu viruses that emerge from pigs.
The animals are considered particularly susceptible to both avian
and human viruses and a likely place where the kind of genetic
reassortment can take place that might lead to a new form of pandemic
flu, said Dr. John Treanor, an infectious disease specialist at the
University of Rochester Medical Center. The virus may be something
completely new, or it may have been around for a while but was only
detected now because of improved lab testing and disease surveillance,
CDC officials said. The virus was first detected in two children
in southern California - a 10-year-old boy in San Diego County and
a 9-year-old girl in neighboring Imperial County. It's not known
if anyone is getting sick from the virus right now, CDC officials
said. It's also not known if the seasonal flu vaccine that Americans
got last fall and early this year protects against this type of
virus. People should wash their hands and take other customary
precautions, CDC officials said. <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> From:
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/kalokerinos.html THE SWINE FLU FIASCO
By Archie Kalokerinos M.D. In 1976 I was working in the far north
of Australia amongst Aborigines. I observed, in one community of
only a few hundred people, when they were given the flu vaccine
(probably the Victorian strain but this detail does not really
matter because nobody outside a few selected individuals really
knows what is in any particular batch), six men died suddenly soon
afterwards. They were not all 'old'. One was in his early twenties.
A few weeks later, in another community I found that individuals
with heart or potential heart problems or diabetes were particularly
likely to drop dead soon after being given the vaccine. Obviously,
there was a problem with some batches of the flu vaccine. A few
months later I was in America. President Ford had been told by his
health advisers that there was going to be a huge epidemic of 'swine
flu', that this could kill may thousands and the only way to prevent
this catastrophe was to vaccinate the entire population of America
- every man woman and child - with a specific vaccine. So the vaccine
was manufactured and the biggest vaccination campaign in history
was begun. I was concerned because the vaccine could not be properly
tested in a short period.
None of the recipients would know anything about what they were
being injected with and the chances were that many would die suddenly.
Furthermore, it was extremely unlikely that an epidemic of swine
flu would occur. So I spoke out.
At first the newspapers got hold of what I said and headlined,
'Australian Physician Call It Mass Murder'. Then I appeared on Kathy
Crosby's television program. Watching that was a man in New York
who did not like a gentleman named Gambino the Mafia boss. Gambino
was about 70 years old and had a history of heart problems. It was
a simple matter to get someone to persuade Gambino to have the flu
shot and Gambino obliged by dropping dead. The newspapers got it
right when they stated, 'Mafia Flu Jab Conspiracy'. People were
dropping dead in the buildings where they received their shots.
Others became paralyzed. The whole program ground to a halt. President
Ford decided to settle the matter quickly. In front of the whole
world, on television, he rolled up his sleeve and 'had his shot'.
I claimed at the time that he was given a 'dud' shot and I am certain
that this was actually done. Then President Ford invited all the
news media men and women who were milling around to line up and
have their shots. Only one man volunteered and he happened to be
the White House press secretary. All the others refused the invitation.
There was not a single case of swine flu. There never was going to
be an epidemic of swine flu. How was it that the world's most
powerful man with the world's greatest department of health got it
all so wrong? No one really knows the answer but what ever it is
it is certainly not clean and tidy. Furthermore, as far as I know
I was the only practicing doctor who spoke out against it and warned
about almost certain consequences. How was it that a doctor with
only basic qualifications and not even the possessor of American
citizenship stood out alone? There was at least one researcher,
Anthony Morris, who did try to speak out but he was at the time
censored and censored very hard. This, therefore, is a classical
example of how only one man got it right and everyone else got it
wrong. This is an important consideration because, when the subject
of vaccines is discussed the fact that the vast bulk of the medical
establishment states that something is so it is not, in reality,
necessarily so. If the establishment can get something so vast and
important as the swine fiu vaccine campaign so wrong then it is
logical to reason that they could also get a lot of other things
wrong. At least it gives reasons to doubt what the establishment
claims to be fact. If doctors and members of the general public
considered this fewer errors would be made and fewer individuals
would suffer unnecessarily.