For EFA models the proportion explained doesn't make much sense when there is rotation involved (which there always should be). That's why only the SS explained is returned, and is the same for traditional linear factor analysis. E.g.
> library(mirt)
Loading required package: stats4
Loading required package: lattice
> mod <- mirt(Science, 1)
Iteration: 36, Log-Lik: -1608.870, Max-Change: 0.00010
> summary(mod)
F1 h2
Comfort 0.522 0.273
Work 0.584 0.342
Future 0.803 0.645
Benefit 0.541 0.293
SS loadings: 1.552
Proportion Var: 0.388
Factor correlations:
F1
F1 1
> mod2 <- mirt(Science, 2)
Iteration: 313, Log-Lik: -1601.969, Max-Change: 0.00010
> summary(mod2)
Rotation: oblimin
Rotated factor loadings:
F1 F2 h2
Comfort 0.602 -0.031 0.382
Work -0.057 -0.797 0.592
Future 0.330 -0.515 0.548
Benefit 0.723 0.024 0.506
Rotated SS loadings: 0.997 0.902
Factor correlations:
F1 F2
F1 1.000 -0.511
F2 -0.511 1.000
> summary(mod2, rotate = 'varimax')
Rotation: varimax
Rotated factor loadings:
F1 F2 h2
Comfort 0.216 0.579 0.382
Work 0.760 0.121 0.592
Future 0.605 0.428 0.548
Benefit 0.200 0.683 0.506
Rotated SS loadings: 1.03 0.999
Factor correlations:
F1 F2
F1 1 0
F2 0 1
> summary(mod2, rotate = 'none')
Unrotated factor loadings:
F1 F2 h2
Comfort 0.559 0.264 0.382
Work 0.629 -0.444 0.592
Future 0.731 -0.116 0.548
Benefit 0.620 0.349 0.506
SS loadings: 1.627 0.402
Proportion Var: 0.407 0.1
Factor correlations:
F1 F2
F1 1 0
F2 0 1