a curious post by microsoft about MinGW in VS

109 views
Skip to first unread message

stone...@gmail.com

unread,
Jul 9, 2017, 9:19:00 AM7/9/17
to mingwpy

stone...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 20, 2017, 10:38:48 AM8/20/17
to mingwpy, stone...@gmail.com
Steve Dower spoke of mingwpy at Pycon 2017:this may 20th, 2017

Ralf Gommers

unread,
Aug 26, 2017, 7:42:20 PM8/26/17
to min...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 2:38 AM, <stone...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steve Dower spoke of mingwpy at Pycon 2017:this may 20th, 2017

Thanks for sharing! That's a good summary of the situation I'd say, although with a working MSVC + gfortran combo for SciPy we now have another option. Not sure which one will be the winner in the end. Technically probably mingwpy is preferable, but it will depend more on how much effort is being spent rather than purely technical considerations.

Ralf

 


On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 3:19:00 PM UTC+2, stone...@gmail.com wrote:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mingwpy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mingwpy+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to min...@googlegroups.com.
 To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mingwpy/19efcdab-dce9-4e17-917a-1aa6a77d88c1%40googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages