Sharon Weinberger is a Washington writer and author of Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld. She will be fielding questions and comments about this article Tuesday at washingtonpost.com/liveonline.

[Suresh]

Sharon Weinberger is a Washington writer and author of Imaginary
Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld. She
will be fielding questions and comments about this article Tuesday at
washingtonpost.com/liveonline.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/01/12/DI2007011201368.html

Sharon WeinbergerSpecial to The Washington Post
Tuesday, January 16, 2007; 11:00 AM

New on the Internet: a community of people who believe the government
is beaming voices into their minds. They may be crazy, but the
Pentagon has pursued a weapon that can do just that.

In this week's issue of Washington Post Magazine, Sharon Weinberger
tells the story of this emerging group of activists who are convinced
they are targets of a government mind-control plot .

Sharon Weinberger is a Washington writer and author of "Imaginary
Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld."
____________________
Sharon Weinberger: Hi, thanks for joining me here to talk about my
article on mind control. It's clear from reading some of the comments
that people have a variety of reactions to the story, and I think
that's a good thing.
Just a note on abbreviations-many of the people who claim they are
targeted call themselves TIs, short for Targeted Individuals. There
are a lot of great questions and comments, and I'll try to get to as
many as I can.
Sharon
_______________________
Washington, D.C.: In deciding how best to characterize most TIs, isn't
the choice between viewing them as psychotics or as authentic victims
too limiting? Wouldn't it make more sense to see them largely as
normal people who, due to a minor brain condition, happen to hear
voices?
After all, hearing (and seeing and other sensory experience) is in the
brain, not the sense organs. And perfectly normal people have
experienced "phantom pain" for some time after suffering loss of a
limb. Indeed, we probably all experience phantom pains every now and
again. And we dream, which in effect involves "phantom sight" and
"phantom sound." So might not many or most TIs, as well as those
claiming religious experiences and UFO abductions, simply be people
with a predisposition for non-psychotic phantom experiences?
Sharon Weinberger: Yes, I absolutely, 100 percent agree with you. I
think you get to the heart of the problem. The TIs want to
characterize themselves as mind control victims, and others want to
view them as mentally ill.
Susan Clancy says that people who believe they are kidnapped by aliens
are odd people, but very sane. Okay, but what differentiates them from
mind control victims? Hearing voices? So, does hearing voices
automatically make you insane? I'm not so sure.
Your point raises an issue that is deserving of its own article. Human
experience is not clear-cut, and phantom pains, voices, and feelings
of being watched or followed are all a part of this experience. Many,
many people will experience fleeting auditory hallucinations in their
lives. Who hasn't had the feeling of "being watched?"
I think that what we are seeing is a continuum of human experience
that ranges from the common to uncommon: Common might be: "I think my
neighbor is watching me"; to what some regard as kooky but not
psychotic: "I was kidnapped by aliens"; and finally to what many
regard as psychotic ("The government is controlling my mind")
Maybe we shouldn't be so quick to judge what's "psychotic." I do think
dismissing everyone who believes in mind control as schizophrenic is a
mistake-not because I believe they are victims of mind control-but
because I feel that's too simplistic.
_______________________
Maryland : A friend of mine from Virginia for several years has been
experiencing events or symptoms like the ones portrayed in your
article-- voices, surveillance, genital attacks. My friend believes
that these experiences are real and perhaps government induced.
I have heretofore assumed that my friend's experiences are psychiatric
in nature. Your article raises the possibility that something else is
going on, or perhaps describes a constellation of psychiatric symptoms
that should be studied, diagnosed and treated. I had no idea that this
phenomenon was so widespread.
Your article did not go into depth on what psychiatry has to say about
the constellation of symptoms that includes auditory hallucinations,
the belief that one is being surveilled and genital attacks. What is
the current thinking and course of treatment, and how effective are
existing treatments?
Sharon Weinberger: You mention that I don't go into depth on what
psychiatry has to say about the "constellation of symptoms" and that's
a good point. Experts in auditory hallucinations-or at least the ones
I spoke with--are very focused on understanding the organic causes,
and don't seem to look at the broader context of how people attribute
the hallucinations. Those I spoke with had no idea there was an
organization for people who believe they are mind control victims.
That surprised me. I mean-here is an entire organization-many or most
of whom hear voices-and the doctors don't know about it. For some
reason, that strikes me as odd.
I think I'm inclined to agree that whatever the cause, yes, the
psychiatric community should look at this issue in some greater depth.
I don't think there's enough attention given to how people suffering
from these problems attribute their symptoms.
_______________________
Washington, DC: I was friends with artists at the University of
Maryland in the 1980s. One guy I know dropped out of school. He
virtually barricaded himself in his house, covering the walls of his
room with tinfoil. When we finally talked to him he said that the
soviets were beaming voices into his head, voices trying to control
his mind, voices telling him to do things. I knew a girl a few years
later. She became instantly very religious and tried to convert all of
us. We panicked that she was in a cult. She admitted that demons were
insider her head, trying to control her mind, telling her to do
things. I never saw her after her parents went to get her, but I ran
into the first guy again, he was functional after years of lithium and
had a job as a graphic designer. Both, I'm convinced, were plain
vanilla schizophrenic. By not giving seriously ill people the
information they need to stop the voices, you're doing a disservice.
They should not be humored or mocked, they should be helped.
Sharon Weinberger: I wanted to make sure I answered your question
first, because I think it's terribly important. First, many of the TIs
agree with your point-that those who hear voices should immediately
seek medical treatment to determine if there is a medical cause. But
this also leads to an important point: there are cases where medical
treatment is not successful at stopping the voices.
I absolutely agree that the TIs do not deserve to be mocked. But to
your point, even if you assume that all of these people are deluded,
they are likely not all schizophrenic. First, not all of them hear
voices or have hallucinations. Some of them just say they are being
followed. Also, there's a large body of scientific literature that
suggests that people can have auditory hallucinations in the absence
of mental illness. And some of the TIs I spoke with had sought
psychiatric treatment, which they claimed didn't help them. Even among
psychiatrists and psychologists, there's a diversity of views. Some
academics have suggested we should look at "hearing voices" as a
natural part of the human experience. I'm not sure what I think of
that personally.
Have you ever wondered why your friends were convinced it was the
demon or government? Rather than judging the TIs, I want to understand
their experiences for what they are, and try to understand why they
attribute the experience to external forces.
_______________________
Los Angeles, Calif: Why do you think all other major media have been
unwilling to touch this subject and why did your editors decide to let
you go where no other major media reporter has gone before? Do
knowledgeable editors and reporters think that we are a bunch of
loonies who aren't worth their attention? Or do they know that we are
telling truth which they have been afraid to expose? Does your
investigation and the response to your article lead you to believe
that we are telling the truth and that our statements deserve further
investigation? Bob S.
Sharon Weinberger: I think many newspapers don't write about this
because there is a lack of evidence that the government is currently
targeting innocent people with mind control weapons.
I think many writers personally avoid this subject because you can
quickly become overwhelmed in e-mails from people in desperate need of
help. It is very hard to start your day, as I have done for several
months now, with e-mails from people who say, "I'm hearing voices in
my head and my life is falling apart."
_______________________
Silver Spring, Md: Really, other than being non-violent, how are these
people different than paranoid schizophrenic Russell
Weston, who shot his way into the Capitol in 1998
because he thought the government was spying on him
through his Illinois neighbor's satellite dish?
How can one believe these people are rational when they
cannot explain why THEY are being targetted and not
many more likely people (e. g. liberal Democratic
politicians)?
Suppose the issue was whether the government had or is
developing such technology, but simply whether they were
being followed? Wouldn't it be clearer then that these
people are mentally ill?
Sharon Weinberger: You raise an excellent point but I'm not sure I
agree with your premise. I think I read that one in five Americans
believes their phones are tapped by the NSA. Are they mentally ill?
Why not? Many of them are undoubtedly wrong.
I have friends who are absolutely convinced that if they write the
words "dirty bomb" in an e-mail that they will be monitored by U.S.
intelligence, and they are pretty sane, even if they're wrong.
You say, "other than being nonviolent " as if that were a minor thing.
Yes, there are people who hear voices and are violent, but there are
also people who hear voices and are not violent. There's also plenty
of people who don't hear voices and do very bad things.
_______________________
Paranoia, Can Annoy Ya: Suppose the government were beaming into these
people's heads the impulse to submit their story to the Post?
Sharon Weinberger: An interesting thought, thanks.
_______________________
McLean, Va: Did you even contact noted intelligence and political
reporters like Walter Pincus--at the Post--or Bill Gertz or Bob
Woodward or Jerry Seper and ask them for help in contacting actual
military and intelligence officials who would tell you that these
people are sick, and there are no such devices on the planet Earth?
For God's sake, it all almost reads like a Weekly World News article.
There are no government agencies sending conversations to people's
brains in the real world! In science fiction, yes--lots of it! In
fiction, you can find that this is a common theme. And that's where it
stays--in fiction.
Sharon Weinberger: It's important to note that I don't personally
assert that government is sending voices into people's heads. Rather,
I'm trying to portray the experience of a large group of people
sharing a common experience and a common explanation.
I did speak with a number of current and former military officials for
the article, and as the article states, the irony is that indeed, the
Pentagon has done work in areas related to "mind control" and "beaming
voices into people's heads."
That doesn't mean, of course, that self-described victims are being
targeted, since we know that auditory hallucinations is another
possible explanation for what people are experiencing. You mention the
names of several fine national security reporters-but they are not
experts in auditory hallucinations.
_______________________
Davis, Calif: Dear Sharon, Thank you for writing and exploring a
serious topic, mind control, when most of mainstream press avoids it.
I know this was an introductory article and I hope you will be able to
write follow up articles as the issue is complex. Recently Jonathan D.
Moreno wrote Mind Wars, a book reviewed by Nature magazine and he
wrote of the thousands of alleged mind control victims that contacted
him as a result of his 1999 book on secret state experiments. In this
heightened national security era, I thank you again for raising an
issue that is rarely discussed but should be, Sincerely, Cheryl Welsh,
law student, also an "alleged victim" and director of Mind Justice.org
Sharon Weinberger: Thank you Cheryl.
_______________________
Falls Church, Va.: It's hard to see your article as anything other
than irresponsible and cruel. It's plain to see that these people are
paranoid schizophrenics, and indulging their delusions by speculating
about the existence of exotic weapons (or UFOS, or fairies, or demons)
only hinders their ability to get a real treatment.
You could have spent a few sentences debunking the myths that you
promulgated. For instance: Contrary to claims made in your article,
you CAN develop schizophrenia in late adulthood; you CAN be a high-
functioning schizophrenic and still dress and bathe properly; there IS
more than one option for medication if one drug does not work.
You could have explored the central paradox of schizophrenia: Many
(perhaps even most) of these people could be cured if they took
medication, but they can't be convinced to take medication because
their sickness prevents them from understanding that they're sick.
Should personal freedom include the freedom to be unhappily mentally
ill, or should forcible treatment of schizophrenics be permitted?
You're an expert in weapons systems. You know perfectly well that
there is no weapon in existence or under development that would
explain these people's symptoms. Your article thus amounts to little
more than mockery of the mentally ill. It's a throwback to the 19th
century, when it was socially acceptable for people to tour asylums
for entertainment, laughing at the nonsensical behavior of those
confined. Shame on you, and shame on the Post.
Sharon Weinberger: I'm sorry that you feel the way you do about the
article, but your view is not unexpected, and also very important.
First, there is no doubt in my mind that some number of people who are
TIs are likely very mentally ill and in need of medical help. But not
everyone who believes in strange things is mentally ill.
There are number of people in the government, and some in the
Pentagon, who believe in UFOs. Some of them believe that UFOs have
visited the Earth and kidnapped people. Some of them believe they may
have been kidnapped. I personally think they are wrong. But are they
psychotic? Probably not.
John Alexander, the former military official I interviewed in the
article, believes in psychic abilities. He believes that during the
Cold War psychics were able to "see" advanced technology developments
and or locations of installations. I don't agree with John because I
doubt psychic abilities, but I don't think John, who has held a number
of national security positions, is crazy.
Ronald Reagan believes in astrology. My husband believes in
stockpiling water in case of natural disaster. I believe that drinking
colored water with vitamins makes me feel better. We all believe in
strange things, and we're not all "crazy."
_______________________
McLean, Va: Sharon: There are so many obvious flaws in the TI's
theories: If they're on to what the gov't. is doing, why doesn't it
stop and target someone else? Why does the gov't. send random messages
instead of useful ones like "kill terrorists"? Why doesn't it beam the
mind control signal over the mountains of Pakistan and tell bin Laden
to give himself up? Why aren't the experiments conducted on soldiers,
who could be prevented from talking to the media? Why doesn't the
gov't. use mind control to prevent them from talking to reporters?
Results of experiments need to be tracked and evaluated; how is that
happening? Why would the gov't. hire 20 people to spy on you by
driving by your house when tapping the phone and bugging the house
would be easier, cheaper and yield more information? Why would the
gov't. hire only Jewish people to drive by?
Did you ask any of the TI's these or similar questions to explore the
logical gaps in their thinking?
Sharon Weinberger: I think there are a number of logical flaws that I
point out in the article, starting with technology and ending with
common sense. The question that I would like to pose is: given these
logical flaws, why do they believe what they do? I think calling them
"crazy" is not a very good answer. I'm trying to answer the "why?"
_______________________
Philadelphia Politician's Office: Your article struck me on a personal
level, and let me please take your time and explain why. I worked (and
still do) for a Philadelphia politician in the 1980s and twice we have
had people come into our office during the 1980s with the exact same
story as Harlan Girard mentioned in your article. We presumed the
people were suffering from some psychological disorder. Both had
maintained they had been government critics (one had published several
articles in socialist publications), both had a connection with the
University of Pennsylvania, and both claimed that the government and
Penn were beaming thoughts into their brains. One woman (whose
identity I do recall and I see she still has a listed phone number in
West Philadelphia) used to call daily and would talk nonstop for an
hour every day. We later learned she must have spent most of her day
calling people begging for help, but we had no idea how to help.
Suddenly, she stopped calling. Years later I was comparing tales with
a friend who worked for a private organization (perhaps they do not
wish to be identified) and she mentioned how this same woman would
call them everyday for an hour at a time. She claims she was taking so
much of their time that they had a Board meeting to discuss the ethics
of an idea they had and they decided, while perhaps it wasn't totally
ethical, they needed to do something to resolve this, so they told her
they had contacted the FBI and that the government had agreed to shut
off the beams. The woman stopped calling.
The second gentleman came to our office one day, told a similar tale,
wouldn't leave but sat in our office all day, then stated if he ever
called our office to not take the call because it would not be him
calling but "them" calling pretend to be him. He then left, and we
never heard from him again, nor did he or "them" ever call. I do not,
unfortunately, remember his name, although it may be buried in some
archives somewhere.
I have no idea if any of the above is of interest. I just send it
along that I find it interesting there is now at least a third person
who in the 1980s claims to be a government critic with a connection to
Penn who claims the government beams thoughts into his brain. Nor do I
know what this means. I just send you my observations. If for any
reason you wish me to contact you with any further recollections, just
let me know.
Sharon Weinberger: Thank you. I'll just post your comment.
_______________________
Bedford, Tex: Sharon,
Hi! I read your article with great enthusiasim.
The targeted community waited anxiously to see the end result of this
article. They wanted to see just how the article would describe their
everyday torture and how would your article portray our community.
Sharon, we have the right to our freedom. We are working with
dedicated energies to find a solution to continue to educate the
general public. Your article was one of the first to help expose the
seriousness of the daily experiences of targets.
Now here we are with an article. What can we expect next from you to
continue to expose what the target community is living with daily?
What can you do, Sharon, to offer a continuing support of telling the
true story of a target?
Sharon Weinberger: Thank you.
As for the future, well, my area of writing is defense technology and
national security, so I guess I'll just keep writing about those
issues as they evolve.
_______________________
Bethesda, Md: Your article led me to read up on auditory
hallucinations on the Internet. It was interesting to learn that some
of the more recent studies link auditory hallucinations to connective
defects in brain tissue and that some of the most promising
experimental treatments are those that stimulate areas of the brain
electronically. It was also interesting to read that the electronic
stimulation treatments have been helpful to some patients whose
symptoms have not been alleviated by drugs.
My reading leads to a number of questions:
--Has anyone been studying any of the subjects of your article to
determine whether they are experiencing abnormal connective patterns
in the brain or other psychiatric symptoms?
--Have auditory hallucinations been observed in otherwise healthy
people (those without mood disorders, schizphrenia or seizure
disorders like epilepsy)?
--If electrical disturbances in the brain can help to treat auditory
hallucinations, could they also be caused by electrical stimulation
from outside agents, as contended by the subjects of your article?
Your article describes a group of people who share common experiences/
symptoms. If these experiences/symptoms are caused by a brain
abnormality, I hope that there are places for them to get treatment
without stigma.
Sharon Weinberger: As I've said in one of the previous questions, I
think the entire area of auditory hallucinations is absolutely
fascinating. One of the key things to note is that scientists still
don't really understand, or agree on, what causes these
hallucinations. That's why I'm critical of those who want to dismiss
everyone who "hears voices" as mentally ill. From what I've read in
the scientific literature-it's possible for people to hear voices and
not have a brain abnormality. Again, perhaps "hearing voices" is not
as uncommon a human experience as might popularly be believes.
Okay that said, there are people who are schizophrenic or who have
intense auditory hallucinations. They are clearly ill and in need of
help. Ralph Hoffman, a psychiatrist at Yale who is quoted in the
article, is studying the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to
treat voices. He has had some success, but not everyone is responsive.
But his work is fascinating.
_______________________
Arlington, Va: Sharon, Overall what did most TIs think about your
article. I have a co-worker that has experienced very similar
"symptoms" to those you described. I want to pass on your article, but
am a little hesistant - I don't want him to feel misunderstood or
mocked.
Also, do you have an idea of how many TIs eventually stop hearing
voices?
Sharon Weinberger: Most TIs felt it was a fair portrayal of their
issues, although some were disappointed that I didn't expose what they
believe is massive mind control plot. I hope no one thinks I'm mocking
them, because that was never my intention.
I think the hardest thing about this article- and perhaps what is
difficult to express-is that I promised the TIs I would give a fair
hearing to their claims, and I believe I have. Writing an article that
dismisses all their claims as the rantings of the mentally ill would
not be fair or honest to what I promised them.
But there's also a concern-expressed in some comments on this forum-
that giving a fair hearing to TIs might wrongly reinforce the beliefs
among some people that they are targets of government mind control,
when they may not be.
I don't know how to resolve this, and hope that objectivity and
balance serves the greater good.
_______________________
Fairfax, Va: Hmm. I find the angry responses to your article
fascinating, because what intrigued me about your article was the
profoundly social nature of the TI's you described: the
demonstrations, the Internet community, the desire to spread the word
and get help. I'm not an expert on mental illness, but regardless of
what we determine "normal" and "abnormal" behavior and beliefs, once
something takes this external social form (rather than something
internalized and antisocial) I think it can tell us something about
our society and ourselves-- and we can perhaps learn equally from the
number of angry responses you get. Regardless of the source of the
TI's feelings/thoughts, they are grounded historically and socially in
the present moment, and to decry them purely as "mental illness" is to
forget-- well, to forget who we are and why we believe the world is
the way it is.
Why do their claims frighten/anger some people so much?
Sharon Weinberger: That's a wonderful comment, and better perhaps,
then I've been able to express my own thoughts on this issue. Thank
you very much.
I think TIs frighten people for the same reason that some people will
mock them and "tinfoil hats." It's a frightening phenomenon, and more
frightening to think "what if it happened to me?"
When I was researching this article, I asked a friend of mine what she
would do if she woke up one morning and heard voices: absolutely
completely real voices. Would she see declare herself crazy, and run
to the doctor and take medications, or call a conference call of
people who have symptoms like hers and would be sympathetic to her.
Think how incredibly isolating it is to have this experience.
For better or worse, she said she'd take the TI conference call.
Admitting that you are "crazy" is not an easy thing.
I do think there is a need to de-stigmatize the phenomenon of "hearing
voices." Calling these people "crazy" does not help them one bit. If
anything, it makes them less likely to seek medical attention that
they may need.
_______________________
North Carolina: Ive been reading the comments, and i have to ask why
you are posting all the comments that are calling targets "crazy"? it
appears to me to be very discrediting and one sided. I am not now of
ever been mentally ill, my life was perfectly happy until 3 years ago
when this "electronic harassment" started. if the skeptics spent ten
minutes of their time realistically researching you would see that
there's something more to this than just a mental disorder. although i
do agree that there are some that are in need of medical help, there
are many that are in desperate need of real protection. this is really
happening, the more that these crimes don't make any sense, the more
effective they are. wouldn't you agree with that? it's plausible
denial. R.
Sharon Weinberger: I'm going to post this, so people can see your
point of view.
_______________________
Philadelphia, Pa: Sharon: Your article did not mention the fact that
there is an organization, International Committee on Offensive
Microwave Weapons, which maintains an easy to navigate website at
www.icomw.org. Persons interested in something more than an Internet
community they've never heard of before might find the website
interesting.
Before Abu Ghraib and The secret prisons and rendition to torture and
Guantanamo Bay I can imagine some of the smug assertions made above
might have been warranted, particularly the complaint from McLean, VA.
However, knowing what we now do about our government, including it's
aimless war in Iraq with its 600,000 civilian, Iraqi civilian
casualties, I will say that any one who disputes the claims of victims
of the government's ongoing program of murder by mind control out of
hand is severely mentally disturbed and should seek psychiatric
attention immediately.
Harlan Girard/ICOMW
Sharon Weinberger: Sorry the full name didn't make it in. In either
case. Please everyone note the organization and website. Harlan's
website is easy to navigate and has many fascinating documents. I
found it useful for referencing some of the technology the Pentagon
has worked on. And as I would like to note is that, yes, some of this
technology really has been researched.
_______________________
Washington, DC: I have to say that the most disturbing part of the
article for me was the government consultant who sees no reason why
weapons of mind control won't or shouldn't be added to our arsenal.
While I don't believe for a second the folks you spoke to are
suffering from anything of the sort, the idea that this could one day
really be a possibility is terrifying to me. It's bad enough we can
poision the water, the air, and the food supply in the name of war. To
think we could invade the minds of other human beings as a form of
attack makes my blood run cold.
Sharon Weinberger: I agree 100 percent. While some comments on this
forum would like to dismiss all TIs as crazy (a word I personally find
unsatisfying), there is a second issue here that I tried to highlight
in the article: the government really is/has been working on some of
the technologies they describe. Also, let's not forget that the CIA
really did, in the 1950s, conduct some nefarious "mind control"
experiments.
So here's the question: should we singularly dismiss every single
"mind control" claim that comes our way. I'm not so sure.
The ACLU recently filed a Freedom of Information Act request to see if
any detainees from the war on terror have been subjected to
nonconsensual lie detection using fMRI. In a sense, that is "mind
reading." So, some of these issues are real. We just have to make sure
we distinguish fact from fantasy.
_______________________
Fayetteville, N.C.: Why did you ignore the testimonies of the victims
at the rally in Washington, D.C. Even a man that had worked for the
Department of Defense that was working on mind control and is now
working on sheilding for the victims.
Sharon Weinberger: Actually, I spoke with many of the people at the
rally. There was simply a limit to the number of people I could speak
about in one article.
_______________________
Seattle, Wash: Ms. Weinberger. I note you do not mention the override
of Ms. Naylor's computer screen described in "1996" to ward the end of
novel. Is that because you see dthis as her invention, or because you
were "encouraged to consider this "classified"?
Sharon Weinberger: Thank you. I guess I would ask why you believe
computer problems are evidence of government mind control? My computer
has problems every day.
_______________________
Arlington, Va: During my childhood here in DC (during the 60's) I
remember a "regular" outside the White House - that ragtag group
constantly in Lafayette Square - who thought the government had
planted a transistor (the technology of the time) in her head.
So maybe this is not a new phenomenon?
Sharon Weinberger: You are correct, the belief is not new, but I think
it's interesting that the Internet has allowed them to form a
community. Many of the TIs told me that for years, they thought they
were alone. Now, they can meet hundreds of people online in minutes
with similar beliefs. I don't know whether that's good or bad, but it
is "new."
_______________________
Sylva NC: Thanks Sharon, this story is awesome.
Perpetrators tried to kill me again over the Christmas holidays with
this pulsed microwave radiation.
I am the author of the Petition to Cease and Ban Direct Energy
programs and electronic surveillance. The petition brought many of us
ti's together.
Over 600 people signed, 50% are torture victims.
Nearly all of us are innocent of any wrong.
Many ti's believe the amish girl killings and other high school kid
killings were the result of the implants being set off in the killers.
It is time to end electronic human tracking and mind control programs,
and I might add, put those in jail who are responsible for the murders
and torture.
Anyone associated with remote neural monitoring, remote sensing, and
human tracking should be suspect.
Sharon Weinberger: I'll post this with no comment. Thank you for
writing.
_______________________
Falls Church, Va.: We who see this phenomenon as mental illness are
not "dismissing" these people; we want them to get treatment and live
normal lives. It's the people who indulge them, who encourage them to
think of themselves as persecuted victims, who are doing them a huge
disservice.
Sharon Weinberger: I understand your point of view, but given that
these people firmly believe in mind control, how would you propose to
convince them otherwise? How would you like to convince them they need
help?
_______________________
Washington, DC: I was wondering if you came across anything on "Trance-
Formation" or the "New World Order" in your research for this article?
Sharon Weinberger: Nope, didn't see anything about that.
_______________________
Raleigh, N.C.: I read recently an article that the Navy has a federal
mind control human research program. Having that knowledge and the
knowledge that the United States and other countries have been doing
human research experiments non-consenually for years. They were doing
mind control experiments early on and had to be stopped in the 1970's
by the church hearings. There is no doubt in my mind that mind control
and voice programs have been hidden for years. American citizens must
be knowledgable about government abuse.
Sharon Weinberger: Let me clarify one thing. The Navy recently put out
a document saying -if- they do mind control experiments on humans, it
needs to be approved by a senior leader. The Navy denies doing any
mind control experiments at present. Let's just be clear on that.
On the other hand, one has to wonder what experiments they are
thinking of doing.
_______________________
Anonymous: Evidence for microwave /directed energy attacks.
Thank you for your important article! In Germany there is strong
evidence for microwave attacks and research in a village in Bavaria,
near Nuremberg: 9O562 Kalchreuth. There are written statements about
the attacks by an engineer and expert in measurement of radio
frequency. There is a report of this engineer titled: Citizens
attacked with microwave weapons. There are wittnesses and even inside
information. These crimes are not done by Americans but by organized
criminals in connection with a big German technology company!
Best wishes from Germany
Sharon Weinberger: Thanks for you comment. I'm posting this because I
do think it's interesting the number of people in foreign countries
who regard themselves as TIs.
_______________________
London, UK: Dear Sharon,
many thanks for raising this issue.
In your conversations with the officials you talk about in your
article, has it ever been mentioned that the development of these
technologies are being outsourced to private research institutions?
If yes, how do we know that the use and development of these
technologies is controlled 100% and there are no possibilities for
abuse by these private institutions?
Thank you again,
Julia
Sharon Weinberger: I'm not sure what you mean by "these technologies."
There are number of things that people call "mind control" weapons.
That are companies working on "microwave weapons."
However, the references in the story to weapons that beam voices into
people's head look like very basic lab level research in government. I
found no evidence such weapons are being used.
_______________________
Detroit, Mich: I'd like to thank you for dedicating your time to
writing this article, Sharon. The input on this open forum comes as no
surprise.
I have a rhetorical question for you. Why do you think we are
experiencing a global pandemic of "schizophrenia," with everyone
affected claiming to hear clearly distinct human voices,
distinguishable by gender, speech characteristics, regional and
foreign accents, and other speech mannerisms? (That is not a classic
form of schizophrenia, I might add.)
Also, why are we experiencing a global pandemic of "lupus," which
curiously afflicts those very same persons suffering from
"schizophrenia?"
Why are those same afflicted persons on a global scale also
experiencing massive, recurrent migraines; pains in the heart; and non-
stop stimulation of the genitals?
In sum, why do we have a global pandemic of combined forms of
schizophrenia, lupus, recurrent migraines, heart problems and genital
stimulation? Should we just chalk it up to a bird flu? Or should we
compare those symptoms with the effects KNOWN to be produced by
electronic weapons (as noted on a variety of DoD websites)?
For those not familiar with the effects produced by lupus, the
information is available on the Internet. The diagnosis by no means
captures all of the symptoms produced by electronic weapons.
One last comment regarding the phenomenon of organized stalking. From
what I've read so far, it is treated as some sort of ephemeral
phenomenon, easily dismissed as a figment of someone's imagination or
mental imbalance. Why haven't you factored in the fact that overt
vandalism invariably accompanies these spooky imaginings? I'm
referring to repeatedly slashed tires, smashed car windows, oil
drained out of vehicles, entries into homes where clothes are slashed,
papers are stolen, and strange liquids are dumped onto carpets, or
liquid detergents are dumped into bottled water. Add to that, piles of
human excrement "excreted" repeatedly beneath bedroom windows 4 inches
from the wall. I could add to that, but you get the idea. Would you
consider those spooky imaginings? And in answer to your undoubted
response, no, the police do not investigate these events because there
are no known "suspects."
Thank you again for your time.
Sharon Weinberger: I'm not sure is global pandemic. Perhaps what is
changing, as I've mentioned several times before, is that people
experiencing these symptoms are able to connect via phone, e-mail,
Internet. That's what is different now, perhaps.
I'm afraid that even in a magazine length article; I couldn't discuss
everything that people associate with mind control and "gang stalking"
that you mention below. However, some of the things you mention (tire
slashings) are an unfortunate part of daily life for all of us. It's
hard to make a connection to a plot.
_______________________
Rockville, Md: A bit of a reality check, which could have been made
more clear by more interviews with actual scientists, academic
professors, intelligence experts, military experts, government
officials and other intelligence and counter-terrorism professionals:
There is no such scientific device to implant "voices" into people's
heads. It's just absolutely ridiculous. IF there was such a device,
does any sane person believe that the government and military and
intelligence agencies would waste time ruining the lives of otherwise
productive and innocent citizeens? No, they wouldn't--the officials
would spend the time, money, resources and sweat on ruining the lives
of terrorists, traitors, spies, thugs, criminals, organized crime
thugs, rebels, revolutionaries, etc., etc., etc., etc.--low-lifes who
pose a real threat. Ask anyone with any experience in intelligence and
covert and cover and classified operations and they will tell you the
same thing. They will also tell you--honestly, by the way--that no one
is wasting time sending signals to innocent people's minds for the
hell of it. The people noted in the story suffer from mental illness--
and they need medication, counseling and professional help. The story
is a non-story.
Sharon Weinberger: I understand your perspective and you make some
important points, but look at this way: most people already regard
these claims as ridiculous. That's why "tinfoil hat," as the article
mentions, is synonymous with conspiracy. I'm aiming with this article
to make sense of why people believe the things they do.
As I mentioned before, we all believe things that are silly or weird,
and the trouble with believing in mind control is that it clearly
overlaps in some places with mental illness. But that shouldn't stop
us from exploring people's beliefs. Take for example Susan Clancy's
book, Abducted. She takes it as a given that people are not abducted
by aliens, and tries to understand why they believe they have been.
I also disagree with your suggestion about how to approach the issue:
If I were writing about why people believe in religion, I'm not sure
I'd spend most of time calling scientists to disprove the world was
created in a week (though I'm sure plenty would provide me with proof
that it wasn't).
_______________________
Falls Church, Va.: You're the one using the term "crazy," and I have
to think you're doing it deliberately to encourage TIs to think that
the world is out to get them.
Mental illness is illness just like physical illness, and the solution
is to de-stigmatize by getting people to treatment. If a person wakes
up with pneumonia, it's not going to do him any good to set up a
conference call with a group of pneumonia sufferers.
By the way, for your article, did you not find any TIs who have been
successfully treated with medication, or did you not look?
Sharon Weinberger: No, I don't personally call TIs "crazy" though the
article uses that word because that's how much of society would regard
their claims. Again, I think your point is important so I'm making
sure to post it. But what I'm arguing is there is a continuum of
strange beliefs. Is believing in the afterlife crazy? Is believing in
perpetual motion machines crazy? Psychics?
Okay, so mind control? Are they crazy because many of them hear
voices? Then again, I raise the issue that not everyone who hears
voices would be diagnosed as mentally ill, according to a large body
of scientific literature. I don't think it's useful to paint a broad
brush.
That said, even Gloria Naylor, one of the TIs I interviewed, suggested
that anyone who hears voices should immediately seek medical help.
That seems to me to be a good suggestion.
_______________________
Philadelphia, Pa: Sharon: I understand that the International
Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons was not mentioned in your
article, nor the fact that we have an easy to use website at
www.icomw.org, where the results of nearly 20 years of research have
been posted. I will appreciate your posting this info somewhere for
responders to the online chat. Harlan Girard
Sharon Weinberger: I think I posted that before, but I'll post it
again.
_______________________
Anonymous: All the discussion thus far assumes that TI's are a
community of people who hear voices in our heads. This is an
experience of less than 10% of the group. We experience a variety of
other symptoms that can only be explained as the result of attacks by
directed energy weapons. For instance, I and other targets find that
the skin all over our bodies is covered with lesions which itch
intensely. We find that dermatologist have no explanation and no
effective treatment for these lesions. Skin without the lesions often
appears reddish, looking like a sunburn although it has not been
exposed to sunlight. Other victims of these experiments experience
other forms of visible physical harm. We don't assume that we are
subjects of government attack merely because we have unexplained skin
conditions. We know that we are being subjected to covert government
attacks because of a combination of facts, which I have discussed in
posted comments. Bob S.
Sharon Weinberger: I'm not sure if it's 10 percent. Some TIs have
attempted to do study the issue, but I've never seen good data.
However, since this touches upon the issue of "voices" as mental
illness, I want to post your comment. Thank you.
_______________________
San Carlos, Calif: Re: Mind Games:
Article is a significant step toward raising public awareness of
covert harassment and the existance of its victims!
Question: Was any consideration given to interviewing David Lawson, a
private investigator and eye witness to the inner workings of gang
stalking who infiltrated the gang stalking network for some 10 years
and wrote a book about his experiences entitled "Terrorist Stalking in
America" (Scrambling News, 2001)?
Sharon Weinberger: I interviewed a lot of people and my focus was more
on technology than gang stalking.
_______________________
Sharon Weinberger: Okay folks. I'm already out of time and I need to
get back to work, so I'm just going to post a few of the final
comments, with no response. It's fascinating to see what a diversity
of views there on this subject.
_______________________
Fairlington, Va: Thanks for such a fascinating, frightening, and
frustrating article. I say frustrating because I'm sure you were
edited for space, but this left me a few nagging questions, among
them:
- Did you consult any neuroscientists for this story? I kept hoping
you'd mention that, e.g., the human brain is designed to seek out
meaningful audio/visual patterns - WHETHER THEY ARE ACTUALLY PRESENT
OR NOT.
- In a similar vein, did your article ever include a discussion of the
brain malfunction that causes a person to hear their own thoughts as
if they are spoken words coming from somebody else?
- How did you manage to confirm all of Alexander's claims & gov't
work?
- And finally, had Girard or Naylor ever read (at least, admittedly)
Waugh's book?
Thanks again for a gripping read!
Sharon Weinberger: Th
_______________________
Winchester, Va.: Sharon..Thank you so much for your WONDERFUL and much
needed to be brought-to-light article "Thought War."
I have a close friend who has been and still is, experiencing this
problem for over five years. He has had a "WARNING" posted on his
website www.zorel.com for many years about this very subject. He ended
up moving from Montgomery County, MD, to Miami, Fla. hoping it would
end...it hasn't!! I experienced this horrible invasion of privacy
while living in California (next to the Bohemien Grove) for 7 years.
Thank God there are others bringing it to the publics attention. You
are a lifesaver! Gary W
Sharon Weinberger: Thanks for your comment.
_______________________
Anonymous: I gathered from the article that these weapons were
supported by Mr. Girard. The V2K is certainly documented by patents
and even NASA and the AF have documentation that can be found. What I
didn't see was that many of the victims or TI's are subjected first to
Cointelpro operations that make them appear to have mental illnesses
such as paronoia and psychosis. Most of the victims have simular
stories that all point to the same people as the targets. It is not
unheard of that the CIA NSA FBI all use these tactics to discredit
people. First they use the technology to put you in an electromagnetic
field where you are unable to think clearly then they use some tactic
either a scare tactic or trick you into doing something that calls
attention in an unfavorable light to yourself. If you want to ask why
TI's do what they tell you then think of the field that they are in.
Since the increase in the secret surveillance without a warrant there
has been more TI's come forward with horror stories. This article only
mentioned a couple of interviews and barely touched the surface of
what is happening to the TI's. As for the tin hats, when you are
targeted with direct energy weapons you will try anything that someone
mentions to relieve the burning, porn visions, dreams and stings along
with the voices. The people that operate this technology have no
conscience. They are not friends of the citizens in this country. If
this technology could prevent terrorist then why didn't it stop 9-11?
It was being used before that time. If the public and the media wish
to remain skeptical there is nothing that we can do. Remember that
Senator Mondale of the Church committee that investigated MKultra and
Cointelpro stated that the senate was not interested in following up
the information that it received. It took the media and the people in
this country to MAKE them do the right thing. MKultra did not stop it
just was redesigned under another secret government name. The FBI and
the CIA can only blame themselves for the mess this country is now in.
When fear makes you violate the law as they are doing with non-
consensual non-lethal weapons then they have only themselves to blame
as leaders in this country how others see us.
Sharon Weinberger: A lot here, but an interesting comment, thanks.
_______________________
Houghton, Mich.: Good Morning,
As you worked background on this piece, did you come across anything
that could indicate the US employs "Manchurian Candidate" -type "re-
progamming" at Guantanamo or other military prisons?
Sharon Weinberger: I didn't really look at that issue.
_______________________
Las Vegas, Nev.: Mind Control
While the article was somewhat long, it was also inconclusive on any
point with the exception of Mr. John Alexander's input. Some time ago
I came across a Patent application that had been filed in the early
sixties on the subject of electronic projection of sound which could
be used to allow one to hear without any actual sound waves.
Apparently they had working proto-types at the time, however, the
Patent Application was taken dark for national security reasons citing
it could potentially be used for Mind Control applications.
According to the author of this Patent application, he didn't
understand why it worked, he just knew that it did. Scientists like me
have since discovered that small signal stimulation to certain areas
of the brain will be interpreted as an audio signal even if the
physical human hearing apparatus is totally dysfunctional. It has also
been discovered that sound can be interpreted if only the Cochlea of
the human inner ear remain with everything else being disfunctional.
Unfortunately, most hearing loss involves destruction of the Cochlea
due to infection.
So if the question is, "can it be done?" The answer is yes and from my
perspective has already been done. Therefore, I don't agree with the
inconclusive stance of the article as even Mr. Girard appears to be on
a search for the reason, "why are they picking on me?", versus proving
whether something exists or doesn't exist. The reason why such
research would be done is simple, as it could be a useful thing, or
someone else might develop it and use it on us. So we better
understand it's capabilities first.
Since we're talking 1960's technology I have to view this concept as
obsolete compared to what can really be done. There is a big
difference between hearing voices in your head versus having a
"thought" or "knowing something is". It seems to me that Mind Control
would be projecting into another the perception that something just
is, exactly what your projecting. I would have to say this is possible
also. Not out of some form of paranoia or fear but from a practical
engineering standpoint. Compared to this, Voices in the Head is just a
form of rote brainwashing, mental terrorism. Obviously I don't agree
with unknowing innocents being part of any test, of such technology.
Our job should be to protect the people, not exploit them!
That's not to say that Voices couldn't be a natural thing in some
cases, that are simply misunderstood by many. Take for example the
ability to predict an event as though one were watching a movie before
it was made. Then the abstract event occurs at a later date just as it
was envisioned. Or the ability without apparatus, to affect anothers
immediate behavior simply by "knowing" it is something they should do.
Abilities such as these would have to appear to be God-like. If you
could package such an invention, the God Machine, then behavior could
be easily modified as needed. The problem becomes, who do you give
that ability to? As "knowing" just one wrong thought could have
disastrous consequences.
B.M. Wendt
Sharon Weinberger: An interesting perspective, thanks.
_______________________
Columbia, Md: Could this be a auditory form of Bonnet's syndrome,
where people with damaged visual systems see complex visual
hallucinations? The explanation in the case of Bonnet's is that damage
eyesight isn't providing enough signal to the visual cortex, and the
visual cortex is picking up neurological interference from nearby
areas of the brain and interpreting that errant signal as visual
input. Could some lack of input or oversensitivity on the auditory
system in that brain be causing the voices? Perhaps what they're
experiencing is not unlike the phantom pains that amputees feel due to
lack of stimulation in the brain when the connected body part is no
longer providing input. I hope they find an answer and a cure. I can't
image anyone in the government funding a program to torture people
year after year for no rational reason, let alone someone not speaking
out against it. The New York Times enjoys leaking secrets right and
left about programs that have real national security justification, if
this were occurring, some humanitarian/civil libertarian would spill
the beans.
Sharon Weinberger: A good point, thanks.
_______________________
Helena, Mont: Partly as a consequence of having lived with someone who
believed they were a mind control victim, I've read a great deal about
mind control programs. While it's easy to dismiss these people as
crazy, I'm convinced that many of them are trauma survivors. In some
cases, I believe that the trauma was past sexual abuse, either
organized and ritualistic or simply in the context of a disordered
family with poor boundaries. In these cases the relentless focus on
invisible tormentors is, I believe, a mechanism for never confronting
their betrayal at the hands of those whose ultimate responsibility it
was to protect them.
Sharon Weinberger: Another interesting view. Thanks.
_______________________
Prague, Czechoslovakia: I came as a human rights imigrant to the USA
in 1981 from communist Czechoslovakia. In 1984 my parents came for a
visit and later they send me a testimony that they have been shadowed
in the streets by a couple living next door. They also testified they
watched installation of some equipment in the appartment of the couple
next door. They thought it was a surveillance equipment. When they
left I started hearing voices. In 1988 I returned to Czechoslovakia
because of that and I informed the Czechoslovak state police that I am
being targeted by U.S. secret services. After the anticommunist
revolution in Czechoslovakia the files of secret communist service
were supposed to be published. Half a year before the vote on the
publication of those files my mother warned me that the U.S. secret
services will attempt to kill me using a poisened needle.
She recommended me to wear leather clothes and watch out in the means
of public transportation. She gave me written testimony about that.
Did she pass me a warning of Czech secret service who believed that
the U.S. services were afraid that their National Security Information
might get published? What do you think?
Sharon Weinberger: Not sure, but thanks for writing.
I'm really out of time now. Thanks again to everyone who wrote.
_______________________
Editor's Note: washingtonpost.com moderators retain editorial control
over Live Online discussions and choose the most relevant questions
for guests and hosts; guests and hosts can decline to answer
questions. washingtonpost.com is not responsible for any content
posted by third parties.