Maximum Value Of Fx

[Lucia]

DuringDC simulation of an NMOS tsmc40 on IC618, I got number of warning and notices. One of the warning is " maximum value achieved for for any signal of each quantity: V; V(I0, Q) = 902.1 mv, I; 7.006 uA. How to get rid of this notice ? is it serious ? how will it affect the silicon results ?

I think this is not a warning message but an information added at the end of each analysis type. Just check if the numbers are within the

limits you expect for your circuit. Kind of a safety feature for you to not miss high-voltage/high-current conditions in the circuit which could damage

the devices.

Thanks for the detailed reply. Yes, its good to have a check. But as long as the voltage is less than max voltage (like 1.1v in this case) and current is less than the maximum current the nmos can handle, such notices should be suppressed. I don't know how to configure. But, your clarification certainly did run away my worry, Thanks.

How would we know what your maximum expected voltage and current are? If a voltage source is the highest voltage that's what's reported (so there isn't a 1.1V source in your case because otherwise that would be the maximum), but even then I've seen cases where somebody puts a very large voltage source in the circuit (sometimes for feeding into an ideal A2D say) and that impacts accuracy - they may have forgotten it's there.

The information is there because high quantities can cause convergence and accuracy challenges, and so making the user aware of them is useful. I really cannot see why you object to being told useful information - it's not a warning (or even a "notice") - it's just information printed in the log file. Having an option to turn off this information would be total overkill.

Currently, I would like to use ImageJ to analyze using macros.

At that time, I would like to extract the coordinates by finding the maximum value of the vertical axis by the item (eg area or average) of the particle analysis result. Assign the extracted value to any variable to use. I think that can not be done with Table.get etc, but I do not think about a good solution.

Thank you for answering many times.

I want to extract the array number (box number) containing the maximum value, not the maximum value.

I am very sorry for the explanation, but I would like to know.

Thank you.

I have 4 pressure sensors that are hooked up to an NI USB 6000 for data logging. By exerting different level of pressure, I can collect analog input over time and show the results in waveform Graph1. The measurements are written in a file in continuous mode and read and shown in Graph 2 after everything is acquired. Please see my attached VI.

Your data is relatively noisy and some of the tops are flat so you may want to try the Peak Detector VI that offers you more advanced fitting options. That VI will not just return the peak sample value but estimates the positions and locations of your peaks.

You have to configure the Convert from Dynamic Data as explained on the diagram of the attached VI, otherwise you only get the first sample of your 3 waveforms (I know it's not obvious )

Also the width value has to be much bigger in order to reject local maximum caused by noise. As you can see on the results the interpretation of the maximum for the first peak is debatable and chosing the array max value may as well be correct.

Sorry for bothering you again. I have one more question. Trying to add 3 more waveforms to the graph, the peak detector only detects the peaks of the first wave. I want it to find the peaks of all 4 waveforms. Please see the attached VI and let me know what the problem is.

I'm receiving an error message when I check the monitoring software and it says "Inverter voltage over maximum value". When this happens, the UPS goes from online mode to bypass with alarm showing on the LCD, "Ouf" followed by "114". The UPS load is just about 16-17%. Input voltage is about 235-240. Is my UPS defective? The device is new btw.

Thanks for the advice. I've already talked to the tech support and we did a hard reset on the UPS but unfortunately it did not solve the problem. RMA request is on the process and they will replace the unit at the same time.

I'm receiving an error message when I check the monitoring software and it says "Inverter voltage over maximum value". When this happens, the UPS goes from online mode to bypass with alarm showing on the LCD, "Ouf" followed by "114". Is my unit faulty

Doing those two things should clear it and tou can check the data logs for voltage readings but by default they only record once every 10 minutes so they might not catch anything. But if those 2 things do not work you most likely have a bad inverter.

But I found a way to solve it by a workaround: I created a new calculated table showing months instead of dates, and then added my CostPerItem-measure as a column in this new table. Then I created a new measure using the max-function and was able to get the highest value . By doing this I was able to use the column in the function, and not struggle with using a measure.

It's glad to hear that your problem has been resolved. And thanks for sharing your solution here. Could you please mark your post as Answered? It will help the others in the community find the solution easily if they face the same problem with yours. Thank you.

Also, if you are as passionate about Power BI, DAX and data as I am, please feel free to reach out if you have any questions, queries, or if you simply want to connect and talk to another data geek!

I get an error when trying your solution - because my "Cost per item (measure)" is a measure and not a column, I am not able to select it after the VALUES-expression, as this expression wants a table or column reference.

All objects in the maximum values table have either a global limit, which applies to the entire FortiGate configuration, or a VDOM limit, which applies only to a single VDOM. For objects that have only a VDOM limit, the global limit is the VDOM limit multiplied by the number of VDOMs for that unit. For example, the FortiGate 100D can have 10 VDOMs and has a VDOM limit of 256 DHCP servers. This means that the global limit is 2560.

By default, most FortiGate models support a maximum of 10 VDOMs in any combination of NAT/Route and Transparent operating modes. For FortiGate models 1000D and higher, a license key can be purchased to increase the maximum number.

Hello, GH Community,

I have a main Brep split by five other Breps. After Split(using Split Brep Multiple component) I want to pick the remnant Brep, which in many cases is messed in the result list ( sometimes it is on the top of the list , sometimes it is on the bottom, in my case it is on the second place in the list) Pls. see an attached file.

Since, There is not the component in GH, which directly gets the index of maximum members in the list, I want to pick the item based areas of the Breps, naturally the Brep (remnant) I want to pick up has

the largest area.

maxindex_in_list_1767872 149 KB

Using edge length instead of area is way faster when there are hundreds or thousands of fragments but the advantage is negligible when there are only a few. There may be special cases where edge length gives incorrect results but it usually works.

I sometimes use the technique of linking all the records in a table to a single record in another - then you can use Max in a roll up field to get the largest value - and if you need this in a form you could build a URL in a formula to repopulate a field.

As @Julian_Kirkness says, the easiest way is to link all records in your main table to a single record in a [Calc] table and then rollup the value from the main table using MAX(values) as an aggregation function.

Thanks for your help.

I will try your solution. I have had confirmation from Airtable that this fonctions are only available in the summary bar. I hope they will develop this soon.

Best Regards

Thierry

The IRS instructions for this item state to "Report the total maximum value of these deposit accounts." This would seem to mean "what's the most money one had in all foreign deposit accounts, combined, at any point during the year."

I am sorry but TurboTax is correct--- While I agree with deluded figure the process creates, the law appears not to have allowed for people moving monies between two reported accounts. Thus what it requires is that each account report the highest at any point in the year and also the sum total of all the accounts at their maximum. This is the way the rules are written for FATCA compliance -- all they are trying to do is to get all the accounts come under the regulation. I agree it seems counter intuitive and definitely results in inflated numbers when monies are moved between accounts. Sorry.

I have had this debate with the firm (large global) preparing my taxes and heard the same thing with respect to Form 8938 and reporting the maximum aggregate value of all assets. I was told "it is the sum of the max of each account. Don't worry about it, it is only informational." (also this is how their software is coded)

3a8082e126