Dear Vanina,
thanks for this report, it helped to find an issue that I will fix soon. In the meantime there is a way to work around it
Remedy
the Slice sampling for the divergence parameter is broken; set this:
bayes-proposals= DIVERGENCE METRO Sampler
bayes-proposals= DIVERGENCESTD METRO Sampler
[In general for data that has good acceptance ratios, like yours, slice sampling seems to be more work than Metropolis-Hastings sampling]
Yes this is a bug, it is inconsequental for the run because it is only a reporting issue, but still should not happen, it is triggered by the option
mutation=ESTIMATE
this option will not work with your type of data, you need dated samples at different time points
set it to
mutation=CONSTANT
Estimating a mutation rate would not work well with your data,
because it is not very informative at all there is very little variation in the data. I wondered also about some of the loci,
for example the first locus has 13 8.11 heterozygotes, 4 8.12 heterozygotes, 1 8.13 heterozygote and 1 11.11 homozygote, this combination seems tremendously improbable,
custom-migration={*** *** ***} is NOT a panmictic model, it is the n-island model with 3 population sizes and 6 independent immigration parameter. Custom-migration and population-relabel are tied together if population-relabel = {1, 2, 3} [as in your parmfile] then we have 3 populations.
To run a panmictic model you need to set the option
population-relabel={1 ,1, 1}
with that, any content of the custom-migration options will be not used.
Hope this helps,
Peter