| Weekly Technical Analysis |
 | |
| 14 July 2014 |
| - By
Vivek Patil, India's foremost expert in Elliot Wave
Analysis |
|
-
Sensex reverses post-Budgets
as suspected, loses 3.6%.
-
Rail stocks take the
beating, hit lower circuits post the Rail Budget.
-
Power/Capital
Goods/Realty/PSUS/Metal/Bank Indexes lose 7-10%
each.
-
Broader market collapses
7-8%.
-
FM says all cases of
retrospective taxation will be scrutinized CBDT
committee.
-
FDI Cap in defense sector
raised to 49%.
-
Personal Tax exemption
raised by Rs.50000 to Rs.250000.
-
Investment limit u/s 80C
raised from Rs.1 lakh to 1.5 lakh.
-
Deduction against Housing
Loans raised from Rs.1.5 lakh to Rs.2 lakh.
-
15% Investment Allowance for
Plant & Machinery above Rs.25 crs.
-
Kisan Vikas Patra to be
re-introduced.
-
Tax on Debt Funds raised to
20%, FMPs take hit.
-
'May IIP at 19-month high of
4.7%.
-
43% deficit in rains till
Jul raises fear of drought.
|
Profit-booking post-Budgets takes Sensex
3.5% lower, broader market tanks
7-8% |
[Technical readings carried forward from previous weeks
are shown in italics. Readers can easily identify the new arguments which
are written in regular font]
Last week we discussed, “the c-leg can achieve 61.8% to 100%
price-ratio with the a-leg … c-leg has almost achieved 100%
price-time ratio with a-leg already … there is nothing
against c-leg achieving ratio higher than
100%. The question is whether it would … The c-leg is smaller and slower as
compared to the a-leg … achieved only 85% price
ratio in 100% time … see if the Budget
expectations could stretch the c-leg further, OR we are in for
completion of c-leg … Faster drop below last
Wednesday’s gap would be considered an initial -ve signs … Whenever there is built
up in expectations, post-event profit-booking is normal. We saw
that on the day of Election Results … watch the response of
market participants to the Budget …”
Sensex
moved +ve on Monday, which was mainly on a/c of gains on its
heavyweight Infosys. After hitting a new high on Tuesday just
before the Rail Budget, Index reversed 695 pts on the same day, post
the Budget, and generated a faster drop below previous Wednesday’s
gap-up area. Attracting
profit-booking once again post Finance Budget on Thursday, Index
finally finished 938 pts or 3.6% lower for the Budget
week.

While Sensex lost 3.6%, and formed a bearish Dark Cloud
Cover pattern on
its Weekly chart, the broader market saw a
bigger cut. The BSE Small-Cap and Mid-cap Indexes tanked as much as
7-8%.
All the sectors which had earlier attracted
buying on the Budget expectations, attracted huge
profit-booking. The Rail stocks, for example, started hitting
lower circuits immediately after the Rail Budget. The Power/Capital
Goods/Realty/PSUS/Metal/Bank Indexes lost 7-10% each during the
week.
Last week, we suspected post-event
profit-booking, and considered it to be a normal phenomenon. The
question is whether, when and at what levels buying can
re-emerge.
As on Friday, Sensex has created four
consecutive Bear candles in a row. It is usual for Index
fall to stall after 4-5 consecutive Bear candles. We may, therefore,
watch if the current fall gets arrested by Monday/Tuesday of the
fresh week.
Levels-wise, Sensex is now just 100
pts short of its previous support of 23rd Jun at 24879, and Nifty is
just 5 pts short of its equivalent low of 7442. We may,
accordingly, watch
if the fall shows arresting tendency closer to this
23rd Jun
low.
The bias is currently -ve after four
consecutive lower lows. If the downwards action
fails to get arrested within a day or two, as discussed above,
history shows that the drop could then continue and stretch to as
much as 8 trading sessions.
All this would mean
that Sensex could generate a relief rally either on Monday or
Tuesday, failing which, it would do so on Thursday or
Friday of the
forthcoming week.
Structurally, the c-leg of “e” could not stretch
itself much beyond 100% ratio to a-leg. Last
week’s reversal is,
accordingly, marked as “f” of the Diametric we suspected was forming
inside the 2nd Corrective since
Feb’14.
Any relief rally we
discussed above would be the last, i.e. “g” leg, of this
Diametric. Such a rally can be a short,
2-3 day affair, in which case, “g” can even end at a “failure”
point, i.e. below last week’s high.
In case, however,
any such relief rally shows strength continuing beyond 2-3 days, it
would be a “normal” “g”, which can hit another fresh high for
the Index.
However, if the fall continues
“violently” for the next 4 days or more, and also breaks below 24687
(Nifty 7375), then it may open bearish possibilities shown by the
White labels on the chart.
White alternate labels
show that the Diametric we assumed in the 2nd Corrective is completed at
last week’s high. So, drop below 24687 (Nifty 7370) could be either
2nd “x” OR
the larger G.

Note that 24687 (Nifty 7375) is a
level below which the current fall would turn out to be the biggest
fall inside larger F.
As can be seen on the
chart above, since
Aug’13, the biggest fall was seen on the day of Election
Results, about 1503 pts, which was bigger than even the “x” wave
joining the two Diametric patterns inside
F.
Also, structurally since
May’14 low of 22277 (Nifty 6638), both rallies as well as drops on
Index were getting smaller. A bigger fall below 24687 (Nifty 7375)
would mean break-down from this “contraction”, a -ve sign
structurally.
Last week’s drop so far measures 1073
pts on Sensex, i.e. it is 430 pts short of the drop seen on the day
of Election Results, which had measured 1503 pts. As long as current drop
remains smaller, i.e. holds 24687 (Nifty 7375), we can end “f” and
open an upward “g” as a relief
rally.
Structurally, since Feb’14, Index is yet to
retrace any of its rallying segment (not necessarily a wave)
completely in a “faster” time.Market has generated initial -ve
indications by dropping below the last significant gap-up area of
2nd Jul.
Sensex
is already into “f”, and the last leg of the Diametric, i.e. “g”,
may still be pending. However, “g” is the last leg and
can be a quick affair. As discussed above, it can even end at a
“Failure” point.
Under the circumstances, investors
have enough reasons to worry, especially if FIIs push sell button
further. We earlier listed such FII action as a risk
factor.
Broader market was outperforming after
16th May,
and the same is now displaying high-beta under-performance on the
downside. Most of these stocks may, however, be local plays, and
do not get reflected on
Sensex.
When we turned +ve on the
broader market from May onwards, we cautioned that these
stocks can turn back as fast. The broader market has already broken
down after Budgets.

All in all, Index appears maturing near the upper
end of the channel enclosing the up-move since Aug’13, as was shown
on the following chart.
The channel encloses larger F from
Aug’13, consisting of two Diametric corrective patterns joined by
“x”.
It was pointed
out that the 2nd Corrective achieved
“external” equality with the
1st Corrective at 25376 on the
day of Election Results.
Once the 2nd Corrective Diametric is
confirmed over, Sensex may test lower end of the channel.
Protecting lower channel and 61.8% retracement level of the
2nd Corrective would force us
to mark the fall as 2nd “x” inside the larger
F.
However, if the Sensex eventually
weakens below the lower channel and 61.8% retracement
level of the 2nd Corrective, it would
indicate that F completed as Double Diametric, and the larger
downward G has opened.
Technical readings carried
forward from previous
weeks
On higher degree, we assumed larger F from Aug’13
to be a Complex Corrective consisting of two Diametric
patterns.
The first formed during
Aug’13 to Jan’14, “x” completed in Feb’14, and 2nd Diametric is forming
thereafter.
Inside the
2nd Diametric, we are assuming
its “e” is currently forming, and “f” and “g” legs are still
pending. The 2ndDiametric could complete somewhere around
15th Jul’14, when it would
achieve time-equality with the 1st Diametric.

Diametric is a 7-legged
pattern, marked as a-b-c-d-e. Until all the legs of
the pattern, i.e. e-f-g, are completed, market may continue to
provide selective +ve
opportunities.
Last
week’s action was below the support line joining previous two lows
of 8th May
and 30th May. Structurally, this
line would be b-d line of the Diametric structure
we are assuming. Sensex is, however, seen holding the channel drawn
on the chart above.
If the “e”, “f”
and “g” legs of the Diametric keep violating the b-d line, Sensex
could enter into an extremely volatile but ranged phase till the
middle of next Month, and the same could form into a topping action
similar to the tops of ‘2008 and ‘2010, as shown on the charts
above.
Investors can hold till it
is confirmed that the “g” leg, and therefore the 2nd corrective as well as
larger F is over for
good.
The structure inside the
larger F from Aug’13 onwards is well-channeled, a Complex
Corrective consisting 2 Correctives, i.e. 2 Diametric patterns, as
shown on the following chart. As per NEoWave, such channeled development is
generally indicative of Complex Corrective involving
x-wave.
It was also pointed
out that the 2nd Corrective achieved
“external” equality with the
1st Corrective at 25376 on the
day of Election Results.
A question was,
accordingly, raised if the 2nd Corrective got
completed on that
day. However, we
now wait for “e”-“f”-“g” legs of the 2nd Corrective Diametric to
complete near the upper end of the channel
:
Once the 2nd Corrective is confirmed
over, Sensex may test lower end of the channel enclosing
F. Protecting lower channel and 61.8% retracement level
of the 2nd Corrective would force us
to mark the fall as 2nd “x” inside the larger
F.
However, if the Sensex eventually
weakens below the lower channel and 61.8% retracement
level of the 2nd Corrective, it would
indicate that F complete as Double Diametric, and the larger
downward G has opened.
In the
meanwhile, investors may keep a tab on the risk factors.
A major event (Election Results) is now behind us. Hope rally has
already played out. FIIs selling off is a
risk factor. So far, this has not yet played out on any
meaningful scale.
Another set of risk factor would be
Global, like Dow breaking its base-line on its monthly chart, etc.
For
India , the
Iraq factor
appeared more significant
recently.
We’ll watch if market
movement develops into a topping formation by ‘Jul, similar to ‘2008
and ‘2010, especially if rallies continue to attract selling at
higher levels, like last week.

Faster
downside retracement of “g”, the last leg of the 2nd Corrective, would provide
NEoWave confirmation of topping
formation.
As long as the Index
holds above its Election Result Day low of 23873 (Nifty 7130), we
may assume 3 more up-down legs, e-f-g, are still left to form on the
main Indexes.
Profit-booking on the day of Election
Results came in from around the Grid level of 25150, which we also
mentioned as our upper target for the “g”
leg of the Diametric inside
2nd corrective.

Among different tools of technical
analysis, VP’s Grid
System, published only in this Weekly Report, has been providing
prefect levels to watch out for, over the last few
years.
The recent high of
25376 was also the level where the 2nd corrective from Feb’14
achieved equality with the 1st corrective from Aug’13 to
Jan’14 “externally”.
Note
that 1st corrective measured 3961
pts on Sensex from
17449 (Aug’13 low) to 21410 (Jan’14 high). This magnitude projected
“externally” from Jan’14 high calculates as 21410+3961=25371,
exactly the high of the day of Election
Results.

On one higher degree, we considered
post-Aug’13 development to be F leg of a larger Diametric formation
from ‘2008 onwards
as shown on the chart
below.
At the recent high, the F leg achieved 100%
price-equality “externally” with D leg. D was from Dec’11 to
Jan’13. With F
achieving price-time ratios with D, the question if whether
F is now over, and larger G would go down from
here.

We, accordingly, may watch if Sensex
shows maturity signs at current levels and starts cracking. Formation of lower top
lower bottom, followed by crash below the 0-x line for
Double-Diametric formation inside F would provide the -ve signs in
this regard. Investors may wait till this actually
happens.
If we do not see formation
of top at current levels, and indeed see the Index strengthening
further above recent highs of 25376 (Nifty 7564), then we may have
to choose the alternate scenario shown
below.
We considered this alternate
scenario when Sensex moved above 2008-10 highs. It shows corrective phase
from ‘2008 completing as a 5-legged Ascending Triangle. This
scenario can open much higher targets, 30000+ for
Sensex.

The 30000+ target is nothing but 100% (+/- 25%)
breakout implication of the largest leg of the
Triangle.
According to NEoWave,
corrective phase should consume more time than the move it is
correcting. After the 56-month rally from May‘2003 to Jan’2008,
Sensex has corrected for 67 month from Jan’2008 to Aug-13, i.e. a
larger period as required under NEoWave.
We
may consider the above scenario if the up-move from Aug’13 onwards
stretches above 25500 price-wise, and beyond Sep’14
time-wise.
The
following picture should throw some light on the post-election movement
on the Sensex since ‘1980 onwards :

Since
‘1980, major
up-moves were seen mainly after formation of a Congress-led
government.
Now that a BJP-led Government is
taking over, and has a clear mandate for development and governance,
we’ll watch if a
new era is taking over, wherein previous historical political
parameters will get
challenged.
As we have been
emphasizing, investors may remain +ve
on the market until clear -ve signs and confirmations, discussed
earlier, are clearly visible.

By NEoWave logics, complete and faster
retracement of the last upward leg, would confirm that the Diametric
structure inside the 2nd corrective is
over. Look how
faster retracement of the 6th rally on the chart above
signaled completion of the
1stcorrective.
Structurally,
on one higher degree, we have been considering that after the major
top was made during the year ‘2008, Sensex is forming a
7-legged Diametric phase
thereafter.
This long-term scenario
marking the larger Diametric was published on 6th Feb’12. This Diametric
assumption, as was argued,compared well with the 11-year
Diametric formation previously seen during ‘1992 to
‘2003.
As shown on the chart
above, F is the
“Expanding” leg of the 7-legged Diametric from ‘2008. In the
previous instance of the Diametric during ‘1992-’2003 period, F leg had hit new highs
during ‘2000.

In other words, F leg of the
diametric making new highs is nothing new. After hitting new highs
during ‘2000, G leg went down till
‘2003.
We argued for a Diametric
development from ‘2008 onwards because we observed time-similarity
within its legs, which is symptomatic of such a pattern. So far, most of the
legs, except B, have consumed exactly about 13
months.
On the monthly Close-only chart,
one can see Sensex crossing previous highs, indeed taking their
support for reaching further newer highs for the F leg :

We, however, cannot rule out that a sufficient
time-correction is required after any multi-fold rally. As shown
below, such time
correction can last for as much as 161.8% to 261.8% time ratio to
the multi-fold rally.
As for the last multi-fold rally during
‘1988 to ‘1992, its correction lasted for 262.8% time ratio, from
‘1992 to ‘2003.

Coming back to the Complex Corrective
development inside F from Aug’13 onwards, we have already explained
F would consist of 2Diametric patterns, joined by
“x”.
Such small “x” joins 2 correctives,
and it can correct maximum 61.8% of 1st Corrective. Thus, if
the 1st Corrective completed from
Aug’13 to Jan’14, “x” could drop maximum to 18990 (61.8% of rise
from 17449 to 21484).
The 19K
level, was also the value of the Monthly trend line joining the lows
of May’2003 and Mar’2009. Note, the Base-line shown on
the chart below, provided support during
Aug’13.
The Jan-Feb’14 fall was, accordingly,
marked as x-wave inside the Complex Corrective F
leg.

We
argued in favor of long term consolidation phase beginning
‘2008 because prior to ‘2008,
Sensex had multiplied 7 times from its ‘2003 lows. We argued,
such multi-fold
rally could results into a multi-year consolidation phase. Inside
such a phase, even moves reaching new highs are considered its
internal part, and not as breakouts, as was shown on the chart
below.
As we noted, after 11-fold
rally during ‘1988 to ‘1992, Sensex consolidated for 11 years till
‘2003 (261.8% time ratio). Within this consolidation, Sensex
corrected as much as 30-60% every time it came closer to previous
highs or even after hitting new
highs.
An ideal
“suckers rally” usually involves making a New
High. As we can be seen on the
chart below, Sensex
moved higher than its ‘1992 highs during ‘1994 and ‘1997, but
reacted by over 30% both the times.
Later during ‘2000, it broke
1992/1994/1997 highs, by as much as 1500-1600, only to lose 58%
later. After a severe corrective phase lasting from ‘2000 to
‘2003, Index broke
‘2000 high during ‘2004 by 100 pts, but even then shaved off 30%
before the next rally could take place.
All this happened because the
11-year long ‘1992-2003 phase was a multi-year corrective phase
correcting the preceding 11-fold rally from ‘1988 to
‘1992.

On the super-cycle degree, we are considering a
“Terminal” development since ‘2003 onwards. The Terminal was suspected
because its 1st wave from 2003-2008 was a
label-3 “corrective” pattern. (As against a normal label-5
Impulse pattern).
The 2003-2008 rally was
internally marked as a corrective pattern called a Running
Diametric.
Also,
more importantly, its only inside a Terminal, that
2nd wave
can be Triangle. (as against this, in a normal Impulse,
2nd wave
cannot develop as a Triangle, only 4th can).

Under the circumstances, if our assumed F leg
continues beyond 13 months, i.e. beyond Jul-Aug of this year, then
we could be forced to consider the current up-move as the
3rd of the
Terminal Impulse, as per the Green labels shown
above.
The basic NEoWave requirement is
that such a corrective phase should
consume more time than the move it is correcting. The ‘1992-2003
corrective phase, remember, continued for a time-ratio of 261.8% to
the preceding 4-year rally from ‘1988 to
‘1992.
As per Wave Theory, a corrective phase
shapes up as 3-legged Flat/Zigzag, 5-legged Triangle or 7-legged
Diametric (which
basically combines 2 Triangles).
The question,
therefore, is whether the corrective phase ended as a 5-legged
Triangle in Aug’13, OR it would continue for 2 more legs and form as
7-legged
Diametric.
As was shown on the chart
below, all the
up-down legs from Jan’13 to Aug’13, except “b”, consumed exactly
20-25 days, and formed into a 7-legged
Diametric (Diamond-Shaped
variety).

As per VP’s observational
rules, all the legs, except “b”, of a 7-legged Diametric tend
towards time-similarity. Indeed, by reverse logic, when
legs begin to be similar in time, the structure is more likely to
form as a Diametric.
Similar to the
pattern explained above, on one higher degree, we also observed
time-similarity from ‘2008. All the legs, except “b”, consumed about
13 months since the year ‘2008.
The question, now, remains if we continue with
the Diametric assumption or complete the post-‘2008 development as a
5-legged Triangle. As we have been explaining, we can open possibility
of ending the phase as Triangle only if we see strength continuing
beyond Jul-Aug of this year.
The
market is being moved mainly on a/c of FII buying heavyweights
selectively, even as many stocks have been trading near
previous lows in the broader
market.
During
8 quarters from Oct’08 to Nov’10, FIIs invested over Rs. 215000 crs
as per SEBI data. In the current 8-quarter up-move post Dec’11, FIIs
invested over Rs.242000 crs. Thus, post Dec’11 up-move has
so far remained smaller despite the larger investment from
FIIs.
As for DIIs, SEBI data shows
divestment of Rs. 32400 crs during Oct’08-Nov’10, and of Rs. 43800
crs after Dec’11. Thus, the up-move of last 8
quarters remained smaller despite the higher FII investment, and
larger divestment from
DIIs.
Despite huge
FII buying in the last five years since ‘2008, the Sensex was still
closer to ‘2008 high so far, despite Net Investment
of Rs. 369901 crs till Jun’13 by the
FIIs.
How reliable is the FII Net
Investment data coming from SEBI is another question. We generally
see the inflated figure in FII buying matching with DII’s selling
figure. However, above observation is made assuming the data from
SEBI is correct.
Not related to Wave
Labels so much on an immediate basis, VP’s 30% Principle shows
that Sensex is at a risk of 25-30% cut every 2-3 years, ever since
‘2004, i.e. in the last 9-10 years.

In this period, the 25-30% cut
was seen from the tops in May’2004, May’2006, Jan’2008 and Nov’10 so
far. The last bottom was during Dec’11. Sensex has now completed
27 months since then without a 25-30%
cut.
We should keep the 30% principle
in the back of the mind, and act as required when the time
comes.
Multi-Year long Diametric
Formation
It was argued that all multi-fold rallies would
be followed by multi-year long consolidations. Sensex, remember,
rose 11-fold during ‘1988 to ‘1992, but entered a 11-year
consolidation thereafter.
Again, during ‘2003 to ‘2008 it
multiplied 7 times. Drawing similarity, it could a 7-year
consolidation starting ‘2008. Further, the consolidation, may
shape up like a 7-legged Diametric, similar to the consolidation
seen from ‘1992 to
‘2003.
The Diametric
formation from ‘2008 is also suspected because each of its internal
legs, except B, have consumed about 13 months so far. So, the E wave from Jan’13
could also continue for about 13 months, and end somewhere around
Feb-Mar’14.

This
long-term picture was fist published on 6th Feb’2012, with both D
legs highlighted in Purple color rectangles. In the previous
instance, the D leg during ‘1996-97 had retraced as much as 97% of
its preceding C leg. In the current instance, D retraced 84% of
C.
Long-term corrective phase on Dow’s
chart from the year
'2000 onwards also
appears to be a
probable 7-legged Diametric.Instead of
“Bow-Tie Diametric” on Sensex, Dow’s Diametric is shaping
up as “Diamond-Shaped
Diametric”.
NEoWave
Discussions
Inside the D leg from Dec’11 to Jan’13, we had had
assumed a 3-legged a-b-c Flat. The “c” part was a 5-legged Impulse,
inside which,5th leg (beginning Nov’12) was
assumed to be a Terminal.
Based on NEoWave
requirements, it
was argued that Sensex would drop below Nov’12 lows in 50% time of
the 48-day long Terminal. Index eventually did drop below Nov’12,
but took 48 day or 100% time (instead of
50%).
As an abundant
precaution, therefore, following alternate
wave-structure was suggested for the D leg from
Dec’11. D is now completing
161.8% time ratio to C.

In the alternate scenario, “c” ended at Oct’12
high, and it was equal to “a” leg. The “d” was the smallest segment,
and “e” (i.e. post-Nov’12 rally) was a “Double Combination” which
ended in
Jan’13.
The
post-Nov’12 rally is retraced by 100% on Sensex, but more than 100%
on broader indices. The larger picture of Diametric from ‘2008
onwards is, therefore, considered
probable.
That would mean
13-month long D-leg has ended at Jan’13 highs, and 13-month long
E-leg started
thereafter.
NEoWave, remember,
allows exceptions to rules at important market turning points or
under “unusual” conditions, like end of larger patterns
or last wave, such as a
Terminal.
Also, Triangles and Terminals
are exceptions to virtually all rules. Since Diametric pattern is
made up of Triangles, NEoWave “Exception Rule” is also applicable to
these patterns.
Since we
were at an important turning point in Jan’13, and dealing with
Terminal and legs of Diametric, perhaps pattern implication rules
could not be satisfied to the full
extent.
Does it really matter
whether the Sensex achieves the pattern implication accurately
within the time-price parameters, when the general direction of the
secular market has been largely -ve as we suspected since Dec’12
?
As we argued, the larger bear phase is already
visible in the broader market. Since ‘Dec’12 we turned cautious
as the rallies were getting smaller (shaping into a Terminal), and
also because of the ‘Jan-topping cycle (discussed
separately).
Terminal we assumed from
Nov’12 to Jan’13, is a special kind of Impulse which occurs in the
last wave position, i.e. either as “c” of Flat/Zigzag or
5th of an
Impulse. Its internal structure is made up as 3-3-3-3-3, instead of
usual 5-3-5-3-5.
In other
words, each leg of
a Terminal would develop as a 3-legged or 5-legged “corrective”
structure, like a Flat, Zigzag or Triangle. Also,
4th of
Terminal must enter the area covered by the 2nd (Overlap
Rule).
A line similar to the 2-4
line on Sensex can also be drawn on the broader indices, and the
same has been broken (as discussed separately).
Sensex,
consumed 59 weeks to retrace 84% of its preceding 13-month fall,
which also was a 59-week affair, as shown on
the chart below :

The
rally, accordingly, was considered slower, corrective structure as
per NEoWave, and not as part of any fresh
rally.
The
channel enclosing the a-b-c Flat inside the larger D leg from
Dec’2011 onwards was shown on the chart below
:

The
80% retracement level was considered and marked as a pattern
implication for the 13-month long Double Combination move marked as
C. Pattern implications, however, cannot be strictly enforced for
the legs of Triangle and Diametric, which are exceptions to the
general rules.
As per NEoWave, most channeled moves enclose a
Complex Corrective structure involving “x” wave. Complex Corrective
involving 2 correctives, joined by one “x” wave, is called a Double
Combination, and carries a pattern implication of not more than
about 80%.
Note that the C leg of Sensex, from
Nov’10 to Dec’11, was a Double Combination, with two equal-sized
correctives (see weekly chart given above), and therefore, carried a
pattern implication of 80% retracement by the D
leg.
Further,
as depicted on the chart below, since Nov’10, it has
been generally useful to consider 61.8% to 80% retracement area as
crucial for terminating moves.

As per Wave Theory, Flat is a 3-legged
corrective pattern marked as a-b-c, where “b” corrects more than
61.8% of “a”. It is also a 3-3-5 pattern where “a” and “b” carry
corrective label of :3, and “c” is an impulse label of
:5.
Around a Flat, we usually draw a
line joining “0” and “b” (0-b line), and take a parallel from the
“a” point. The “c” leg should normally end near such parallel. The channel indicates
similarity of its 3 internal legs, reason why Flats are called
Flats.
Inside “c” of D
(beginning Jun’12) for Sensex, we were expecting a 5-legged
Impulse, because Flat is a 3-3-5
structure.
As per NEoWave “Extension rule”, one of the
directional leg inside an Impulse should get “extended”, i.e.
achieve 161.8% ratio to the next largest
leg.
Since 1st and 3rd were “normal”, we could
have projected 5th wave Extension. However,
such a move would project values slightly above the Nov’10 highs,
which would jeopardize the larger assumption of “Bow-Tie” shaped
Diametric from ‘2008 onwards.
We,
therefore, preferred 5th of “c” not to achieve
161.8% ratio, but terminate below Nov’10 highs, from where a
downward E would open. Since E begins the
“expanding” phase of the Bow-Tie Diametric, it would break below
Dec’11 lows.
The 1st and 3rd inside “c” of D continued
for about 4-5 weeks each. We expected 5th to consume a similar time,
and end somewhere in the month of Dec’12 or near to
it.
As the beginning part of
5th shows
violence on upside, we suspected 5th could develop internally as
a 1st Extension Impulse or
Terminal. Since a “Terminal” always
occurs at major turning point, it would be able to generate the
necessary downside power for the larger E
leg.
In the 7-legged “Bow-Tie” shaped
Diametric from ‘2008, one can see a reduction in magnitude from A
leg to D leg. The D leg is the smallest segment of the Bow-Tie
shaped Diametric.
The other half
of this Diametric, i.e. E-F-G legs, should show expanding
magnitudes, and therefore, E should become larger
than the D leg. This can happen only when E breaks the bottom
Dec’2011.
After breaking the
13-month long channeled C (from Nov’10 to Dec’11), we had suspected
that development
post Dec’11 has potential only to be marked as D leg of a much
larger Triangle or Diametric from
‘2008.
This option was preferable
because C leg from Nov’10 was not an
Impulse. A Non-impulsive C leg could
only be part of a larger Triangle or
Diametric.
BSE Dollex-30
Index
Meanwhile, since the FII activity turned a prominent
factor in the Indian stock market, we examined the development
of BSE Dollex-30
Index.
This Index shows
Dollar-Value of Sensex, and is currently 37% lower than the actual
Rupee-Value of the Index.
The Index is now attempting to break
above the Red resistance line, as F attempts to show
“expansion”.
30%
Principle
All major tops are characterized by 30% drop
from the top value. This is normal not only inside a bear phase, but
is commonly seen even inside a bull phase too. The 30% taken out
from the current top value on Sensex (21109) would be less than
14800.
The total loss so far, from
the high of 21109 to 15425, measures around 28% so far.
However, on BSE
Small-Cap and MidCap Index, the loss from ‘2010 high does measure
more than 30%.
Overall, it was argued much earlier, that
we would see a topping formation spread over 2-3 month period
beginning ‘Oct’10. This played out well as suspected. Indeed, as was
observed, 60% of stocks topped out during ‘Oct’10 itself, and many
have already shaved off much more than 30%, though Sensex itself
shaved off only 28%.
2450-point Grid chart for the
Sensex
Sensex has
been following a Grid of 2450-2500 points since ‘2008.
These Grids are shown on the Weekly chart of Sensex below. One can
find a bottom or a top getting formed at each of the Grid
levels.
Index during ‘2013 reacted
thrice from the Grid level at 20250, and later held the Grid level.
The next Grid level of 22700 was targeted and the same is now
achieved. Watch if Index mature at the next Grid level of 25150.
The larger
pictureOur markets, remember, has seen multifold rallies
previously, each time continuing for about 4 (four) years, after
which, it usually enters a multi-year consolidation phase. In other words,
“long-term” has always meant 4 years in Indian
context.
Remember, Sensex
rallied 11-fold
from 390 (Mar’88) to 4546 (Apr’92) in four years, after which
it consolidated for
11 years from ‘1992 to
‘2003.
In ‘2008, it
completed another 4-year rally from ‘2003, during which Sensex rose
7-fold from 3000 levels to 21000. It may now consolidate for 7 year,
beginning ‘2008, preferably forming as a Triangle or
Diametric.
We
explained that the 14-month fall from Jan’08 was a Triple
Combination “A” leg of a large multi-year consolidation. The
corrective phase beginning Mar’09 retraced about 99% of the previous
fall from
21206 (Jan’09) to 8867 (Mar’09), (which was labeled as a Triple
Combination). The
longer time required while rallying is symptomatic of its corrective
label of “B”.
The rally from 8047
(actually beginning at 8867) was, therefore, considered as the “B”
leg. The next leg downwards would be labeled as “C”. Such a-b-c development
since Jan’08 would be considered part of the 2nd wave of what appears as a
probable Terminal beginning
‘2003.
Even though we saw the
market reaching levels above Jan’08 highs, the multi-year
consolidation is expected to shape up like a large decade-long
Diametric, looking similar to the consolidation we saw
from ‘1992 to ‘2003. Our trading/investment
strategies should be designed
accordingly.
The suspected
corrective phase beginning Jan’08 would be the 2nd wave within the larger
5th wave. This 5th wave is suspected to
be forming as a
Terminal due to absence of impulsive behavior in its internal
1st wave. The “Terminal”
confirms when the Sensex drops below the 2-4 line of one higher
degree.
One may see the Yearly chart in Appendix,
which shows the 2-4 line and its values for the next three years.
Remember, Terminal
development usually violates the 2-4
line.
The
Sensex is assumed to be under the influence of a large 8-year cycle ever
since its birth. As shown on the chart
below, '1984
was the beginning of 8-year long bull-run till
'1992. In
our Super-Cycle Degree count, shown on ASA Long-Term chart under a
separate paragraph, we’ve considered ‘1984 as
the beginning point for the most dynamic 3rd
wave.
The next
two important
turning points occurred exactly 8 years thereafter, in '1992 and
'2000. Both these turning points were marked by
stock market scams, because of which, the
leaders of the rally had extremely difficult time later. For
example, ACC, the leading stock of '1992 bull market, remained below
its highs till end of '2004. Similarly, the IT stocks, which were
leaders of '2000 rally, lost as much as 90% of their top valuations
by the year '2003.
During ‘2008, we were
sitting on this very important cycle, which
therefore, threw up similar
possibilities.
In the
previous 8-year cycle top during ‘1992, Sensex
lost 57% from 4546 to 1980. In the next cycle top, the cut was almost 58%
from 6150 in ‘2000 to 2594 in
‘2001.
We had, accordingly, targeted sub-10k levels
for Sensex price-wise during ‘2008-09,
and a minimum of 13
months into bear phase, time-wise. The price-time
targets were achieved as Sensex dropped 63% from 21206 to 7697. The
yearly channel, shown below, which was used earlier to project 20000
level for the Sensex during ‘2007, was broken when the Index moved
below 17200.Break of this long-term channel also weighed in favor
of a larger corrective phase following this 8-year
cycle.
Appendix :
Super-Cycle-degree Wave-scenarios for
Sensex
For Super-Cycle-Degree
wave-scenario, consider following ASA Long-Term Index. This Index
has been created by combining a very old Index compiled by a British
advisor (from '1938 to '1945), with RBI Index ('1945 to '1969), F.E
Index ('1969 to '1980) and Sensex (thereafter till
date).
The
wave-count presented shows that the market is into the lower-degree
5th of the SC-degree 3rd or 5th wave.
The
detailed wave-count from ‘1984 onwards can be seen on the Monthly
chart given below. The 2-4 line shown on the ASA long-term Chart
above, and Monthly chart below, would determine if the post ‘1984
Impulse is a Super-cycle-degree 3rd or
5th.
Super-Cycle-Degree
3rd (or
5th) began since Nov’84. Its internal 3rd was an “extended”
leg, which achieved exactly 261.8% ratio to the 1st on log scale. The Sensex is
now forming the 5th Wave, and the same could
develop as a ”Terminal”, because its lower-degree 1stwave
from May’03 onwards developed as a Diametric (which is a
“corrective” structure, rather than an “impulse”). Within the
non-directional legs, 2nd was exactly 61.8% of 1st value-wise, and
161.8% time-wise. The 4th was 38.2% of 3rd value-wise, and 261.8%
time-wise.
While
the 4th is
shown as a 3-legged a-b-c Flat on the monthly chart above.
Alternatively, the 4th is shown as a 7-legged
a-b-c-d-e-f-g Bow-Tie Diametric on the Monthly chart below. The
chart below also shows 11-year parallel channel from Apr'1992 to
May'2003. As shown, if one projects the width of this channel on
upper side, such a projection gave 20000 as the “minimum” target.
This forecast was achieved.
.
As mentioned above, the
lower-degree 1st from May’2003 to Jan’2008
appears to be a Bow-Tie Diametric, marked as a-b-c-d-e-f-g. It
is called "Diametric" because it combines two Triangular patterns,
one initially “Contracting” up to the "d" leg, followed by an
“Expanding” one. The contraction point is the "d" leg, and the
legs on either sides of it tend to be equal. Accordingly, "c"
and "e" were equal in "log scale", both showing about 60% gains.
Similarly, "g" was equal to "a", both showing about 115%
gain.
The
Diametric development from ‘2003 to ‘2008 is considered to be the
1st wave of the Impuse. Due to the corrective structure in the
1st leg,
the higher-degree 5th could be developing as a
Terminal. Since ‘2008, we are into its 2nd wave, which could
continue to develop over a period of 7-8 years beginning
‘2008.

As per NEoWave, break of 2-4
line confirms a Terminal development, and If the 5th proves to be a Terminal,
the Super-Cycle-degree label of 3rd will have to change to
5th, because only a 5th of a 3rd cannot be a Terminal. Only
a 5th of
the 5th can
be a Terminal. The Super-Cycle-Degree marking for
1st and
2nd as
shown on ASA long-term chart, would then change to
3rd and
4th respectively.
|
|
|
| |
Disclaimer : These notes/comments have
been prepared solely to educate those who are interested in the
useful application of Technical Analysis. While due care has been
taken in preparing these notes/comments, no responsibility can be or
is assumed for any consequences resulting out of acting on
them. | |