Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
阳光软件.midas-civil
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
水平的框架中,自重作用下为什么会出现轴力。
0 views
Skip to first unread message
江安
unread,
Sep 17, 2006, 10:01:16 AM
9/17/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 阳光软件.midas-civil
碳纤维(53914705) 21:46:14
跟大家分享一下前二天碰到的问题:
碳纤维(53914705) 21:47:10
问题的提出是这样的:用户反映在梁格中,纵梁怎么会出现轴力?而且没有水平向的反力
小小 (21752502) 21:48:32
聆听中
碳纤维(53914705) 21:49:04
后来将模型简化成这样的:
碳纤维(53914705) 21:51:24
左边二个模型是外侧的梁低了一点,(实际在梁格中,可能会出现形心不在同高度的问题),而右侧的梁是在同一高度上的。上面的是通过梁刚臂来实现梁的位置差,而下面的右边是通过偏心来实现的。
碳纤维(53914705) 21:52:43
碳纤维(53914705) 21:52:54
轴力图如上图所示
碳纤维(53914705) 21:53:27
我想了好几天都没想明白,今天晚上终于搞清楚了。
碳纤维(53914705) 21:55:06
问题就是在这样的水平的框架中,自重作用下为什么会出现轴力。模型文件上传为"框架轴力.mcb"
碳纤维(53914705) 21:56:03
请大家谈谈各自的看法,我明天上传我自己认为的结果。
框架轴力.mcb
简化模型示意.GIF
Fx图.GIF
江安
unread,
Sep 17, 2006, 9:50:30 PM
9/17/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 阳光软件.midas-civil
很难从直观的理解来解释这样的事。
于是进一步简化了,将有边界的地方全部设成固接,也就是光看一半的框架的影响。发现结果是变了,但是,轴力还是有的。
看一下位移就知道了,原来二根横梁往内侧走了啊!往内侧走的原因是因为纵的自重造成跨中下挠,而纵梁的与横梁的形心不是交在一个点上,所以,在纵梁与横梁交错的地方,形成了,纵梁往外,而横向往内的位移,然后当然有轴力了。
通过这个例子来了解到,如果梁格二纵梁的形心不在一条线上,计算时会造成有轴力的现象,而这个力,通过分析,也是应该有的。但是,这个问题应该可以通过调整纵梁的截面,使得各梁格截面与总的梁的截面的形心在同一高度上。
在06-9-17,
江安
<
777...@gmail.com
> 写道:
框架水平位移.GIF
goldchina
unread,
Sep 17, 2006, 10:11:27 PM
9/17/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 阳光软件.midas-civil
首先非常感谢江老师的分析与总结。
我想请教下,对于变截面梁(如悬臂浇筑的梁)的话,截面该怎么取?或者是建模的时候节点取在什么位置?
如处理不好的话会不会产生同样问题呢?
江安
unread,
Sep 17, 2006, 10:14:08 PM
9/17/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to midas...@googlegroups.com
不会有这个问题。一般取底对齐。
在06-9-18,
goldchina
<
goldchi...@sina.com
> 写道:
江安
unread,
Sep 17, 2006, 10:14:30 PM
9/17/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to midas...@googlegroups.com
不好意思,打错了,是顶对齐比较方便。
在06-9-18,
江安
<
777...@gmail.com
> 写道:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages