Groups
Groups
Sign in
Groups
Groups
阳光软件.midas-civil
Conversations
About
Send feedback
Help
关于简支梁温度力问题
1 view
Skip to first unread message
ALEXLIN
unread,
Aug 13, 2006, 4:04:11 AM
8/13/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 阳光软件.midas-civil
简支梁按规范应该考虑温度力才对吧?但我看了几个MIDAS的模型对简支梁都没有考虑温度力,不知道何解?
江安
unread,
Aug 13, 2006, 6:30:26 AM
8/13/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to midas...@googlegroups.com
要考虑,如果例子中没有考虑,要不是按老规范做的,要不就是失误,还是要相信自己。
2006/8/13, ALEXLIN <
linb...@163.com
>:
简支梁按规范应该考虑温度力才对吧?但我看了几个MIDAS的模型对简支梁都没有考虑温度力,不知道何解?
ALEXLIN
unread,
Aug 13, 2006, 10:37:06 AM
8/13/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to 阳光软件.midas-civil
呵呵。我看的就是新规范的。因为荷载都是用公路1级的
江安
unread,
Aug 13, 2006, 11:46:08 AM
8/13/06
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to midas...@googlegroups.com
:),例子只能作为参考啊,呵呵
2006/8/13, ALEXLIN <
linb...@163.com
>:
呵呵。我看的就是新规范的。因为荷载都是用公路1级的
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages