In terms of performance, what's the difference between the MSSoapInit2 and
the MSSoapInit mothed? Does anyone know to speed up the soap connection?
Thanks.
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Use of included script samples are subject to the terms specified at
http://www.microsoft.com/info/cpyright.htm.
"Bryan" <bt...@consensusmed.com> wrote in message
news:u8RKLIkJ...@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> 1) Load the WSDL from a local file instead of over the network
Hi, what kind of changes do I need to apply to the WSDL, in order
to put it on all clients' C: ?
I think the "SOAP:address location=" section, in the following
part of the WSDL, should be modified:
<service name='ws_test' >
<port name='ws_testSoapPort'
binding='wsdlns:ws_testSoapBinding' >
<soap:address
location='http://SRV-PROD/WS_DEVPATH/ws_test.WSDL' />
</port>
</service>
Or not?
Moreover, for the clients, do I only have to change the path I
specify with MSSoapInit, giving it the path of the local WSDL
instead of the remote one?
TIA,
Villi
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"Villi Bernaroli" <novil...@tinspam.it> wrote in message
news:uPhHJ6ZK...@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> No, you don't have to change the WSDL at all. Just change
mssoapinit and
> replace the URL with a full path to the WSDL file.
Yeah, I have seen it.
Trying it out, it seems that keeping the WSDL local is useful
only for the call of the MSSoapInit method (gotta download the
wsdl), than the subsequent calls to the methods of the SOAP
object don't get hurried. So said my tests, anybody else has had
different results?
Thanks
Vilco