First shot of Xbox2 `Xbox 360 `Xenon hardware !
R500 Xenon
This seems to be the real deal. The Xbox2 / Xenon / Xbox 360
http://img.engadget.com/common/images/1488407751772606.JPG
Console - Controller - Camera
http://engadget.com/entry/1234000490042605/
quote:
________________________________________________________
" Can't tell you how we got our hands on this image, but what you're looking
at is a real live shot of the Xbox 360 that someone sneakily snapped with
their cameraphone at Microsoft's Xbox360 Revealed launch party in Los
Angeles last night. Also note the presence of a hard drive attachment up
top, the white controller, the Xbox Live headset, and what looks like that
EyeToy-like camera peripheral we've been hearing about."
_________________________________________________________
Dr Gordon Crowbar
John S
"Dr Gordon Crowbar" <Jus...@c.com> wrote in message
news:8r2dnUxUjKS...@pipex.net...
> Looks slightly smaller that the current model.
And you know this how?
It isn't sitting next to a current version for comparison. hmmmmmm
Boody Bandit
disappointed
Dr Gordon Crowbar
"John S" <johnds...@teraearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:XKafe.10418$HL2....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
OK, estimation class 101:
1) Can you see the slot that takes DVD discs?
2) Now, assume that the slot a little bigger than the disc itself.
3) Holding a disc in your own hand, realise how retarded your comments are.
Of course, if the slot is somehow much larger than the disc, then my
estimation is wrong. But then I did start my thread with "Looks" and not
"Is".
Cryofax
>
> "John S" <johnds...@teraearthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:XKafe.10418$HL2....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>
>> "Dr Gordon Crowbar" <Jus...@c.com> wrote in message
>> news:8r2dnUxUjKS...@pipex.net...
>>> Looks slightly smaller that the current model.
>>
>> And you know this how?
>>
>> It isn't sitting next to a current version for comparison. hmmmmmm
>
> OK, estimation class 101:
>
> 1) Can you see the slot that takes DVD discs?
>
> 2) Now, assume that the slot a little bigger than the disc itself.
Why would you assume this? I think the class you took was "Baseless
Assumptions 101"
> 3) Holding a disc in your own hand, realise how retarded your comments
> are.
No his comment is a fair question.
> Of course, if the slot is somehow much larger than the disc, then my
> estimation is wrong. But then I did start my thread with "Looks" and not
> "Is".
Thus your whole hypothesis is pointless and without merit.
- Cryo
Dr Gordon Crowbar
"Cryofax" <Ba...@TheMoon.com> wrote in message
news:1ZKdnShSWuT...@giganews.com...
It's not really pointless if my POV is opposite to the other posters.
By implication , you are saying that the OP was pointless and are saying
that all speculative posts are pointless.
We therefore reach an impass, where all we can discuss on here is cold hard
facts.
Are those your rules?
Cryofax
Even opinion is based on something. And cold hard facts trump opinion. If
you simply want to state it looks smaller because you think it looks smaller
then fine. But you mentioned your reasoning was based on the size of the dvd
tray opening which you yourself admitted we have no way of knowing the size
of from the picture. The other poster just questioned your reasoning to
which you responded he was "retarded", when in fact his opinion was every
bit as valid as yours, if not moreso. You were stating you thought it looked
smaller, he was simply stating there's nothing to really indicate that and
he's right. That's not to say you might not be right. But then opinions are
like assholes right?
- Cryo
Dr Gordon Crowbar
"Cryofax" <Ba...@TheMoon.com> wrote in message
He said "And you know this how?", when I didn't say that I knew anything.
Dr Gordon Crowbar
http://www.joystiq.com/entry/1234000900045546/
I thank you.
"Dr Gordon Crowbar" <Jus...@c.com> wrote in message
news:FumdndJvW8k...@pipex.net...