Copy/paste to put all the data sources together is not an option. Too many
to deal with.
Thanks!
--
JEverhart
> Copy/paste to put all the data sources together is not an option.
I would suggest it would have to be an option if there are no better
options.
--
Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk
"JEverhart" <JEve...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:57DB86E5-D168-4DE7...@microsoft.com...
--
JEverhart
In this case it might be easier not to use a merge, but to copy/paste
special|paste link each cell into your table. In fact, if you select the
first cell you want to use in Excel, then edit copy, then edit|paste, paste
link (use a plain text or rtf format) into word, then use Alt-F9 to reveal
the pasted LINK field code in Word. You should be able to copy the LINK
field and modify the workbook/sheet/cell reference for each cell in your
table.
(You'd need Excel on the machine that's going to do the "merge" to do it
that way).
--
Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk
"JEverhart" <JEve...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:415FC173-42AA-4EEF...@microsoft.com...
e.g. if you are going to create 35 copies of your 16-page mail merge main
document, then you presumably have another data source that has 35 rows in
it to drive the merge? Is the same data from the same Excel sheets going
into each of the 35 copies, or are you trying to get rows 1-20 from sheet 1
into copy 1, rows 21-40 iinto copy 2, etc.?
It is highly likely that this merge is going to be beyond the
"out-of-the-box" capabilities of Word, but let's see.
(For the "splitter" part, see the material by Graham Mayor and Doug Robbins
at http://www.gmayor.com/individual_merge_letters.htm - I suspect that the
"splitter" code near the bottom is going to be more useful in this case as I
suspect your merge may be too complex for the add-in to be useful)
--
Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk
"JEverhart" <JEve...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FE8A82BD-5A0E-40C6...@microsoft.com...
*They go into Columns 1 (20 items), 2(10 items), and 3(4 items) in the Word
Document respectively.
*As I mentioned, I can do away with the table in the Word doc
*I need the items in each Excel document to merge into the Word doc.
*The result of this would be a 560 page merged document.
Does that help clear things up a bit?
Then use that as the data source for a mailmerge where you simply take the
content of each of the 34 cells in your table from the 34 columns in the new
sheet.
If you are stuck on the Excel VBA front, I can try to do something but not
right now. However, if you do go that route, I suggest you write the
34-column table as a table in a Word document (or, e.g., as a set of
tab-delimited rows in a Word document as long as there are no tabs in your
data) unless you know that the resulting Excel sheet would not fall foul of
the problems described in http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk/t0003.htm
--
Peter Jamieson
http://tips.pjmsn.me.uk
"JEverhart" <JEve...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:31181503-028A-41E0...@microsoft.com...