I've checked, and my Level 1 is set to start at 1, and each of the lower
levels are set appropriately to restart the numbering.
I've tried changing this paragraph to Normal and then resetting it to List,
and that didn't do anything.
Please advise. I thought by following Shauna's excellent instructions,
everything would turn out fine and I wouldn't have any more hassles.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Bothell writer" <Bothel...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:BDFF09DA-1990-457F...@microsoft.com...
Right now, there are other styles used for numbered lists. I began with a
300-page manual that had several different numbering styles, in addition to
numbering sequences manually formatted (so they show up in my Formatting in
Use with no paragraph marker).
I'm trying to clean it up by creating a numbered list style based on Shauna
Kelly's instructions and then will migrate all the old styles and manual
formatting to this new style.
Shall I resolve it by adding the LISTNUM field "LISTNUM \l 1 \s 0" to each
of the numbered lists? This is a procedural manual so there are 100's of them.
Alternative suggestions would be appreciated as well as a quick reply.
Thanks so much!
Thanks again.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Bothell writer" <Bothel...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:597FF963-5D5C-4537...@microsoft.com...
1. Take an existing numbering scheme in the manual and base my numbering
style using Shauna's procedures on that. It makes me a bit uncomfortable
because I could be dealing with legacy problems from the FrameMaker
conversion, but it might be faster because I wouldn't have to change existing
styles.
2. Then set up the LISTNUM code at the end of each of the numbering
sequences. That's time-consuming too.
I'd appreciate it if someone can weigh in whether this would be a good
approach.
Also, I'm wondering why, if the LISTNUM field or some other method (blank
level 1, etc.) is needed in order to restart numbering for each list, why
Shauna didn't mention it in her procedures? They were very good -- was I
naive to assume they were all-inclusive?
Thanks!
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Bothell writer" <Bothel...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EC4DCB79-390F-47B7...@microsoft.com...
Are the other numbering styles, as well as the manually formatted numbered
paragraphs in the document creating havoc with my new list styles?
In the conversion from FrameMaker to Word, the converted numbering styles
came through with no numbering scheme -- just as hanging paragraphs. I'd
thought by creating a whole new set of styles based on Shauna's instructions,
I'd be able to search for the old styles and replace them with the new style,
resuliting in fewer problems. I haven't done the search and replace yet,
since the lists I've applied them to are not resetting the numbering to 1
with each new sequence. These sequences are several pages apart.
Should I edit those legacy styles based on Shauna's outline numbering? I'd
thought that might create more problems than starting fresh.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Bothell writer" <Bothell wri...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:24F85934-B691-4448...@microsoft.com...