Hi Robert,
You'll solve more than half the problem by removing the incorrect period
after "et". The expression "et al." is an abbreviation for the Latin phrase
"et alii" meaning "and others"
(http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=et%20al.). Because "et" isn't
being abbreviated, it doesn't take a period.
The grammar checker does still complain about a period followed by a comma,
but you can easily ignore that. Maybe a future version will recognize
abbreviations as exceptions to that rule.
--
Regards,
Jay Freedman
Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Robert Paveza" <rob...@paveza.net> wrote in message
news:3F03423B-B936-415F...@microsoft.com...
> The verbiage "et. al.," meaning "and others" or "among others," is common
use
> in academic literature. Word's spelling and grammar checker appears to
have
> absolutely no recognition for this. "et.al." returns a spelling mistake,
and
> "et. al." (the more appropriate way) returns two grammar errors, and also
> attempts to autocorrect the "al." to "Al."
>
> Appropriate usage would be to cite an author and his or her colleagues,
such
> as "In a study by Briggs-Gowan, et. al. (1996), the authors...".
>
> When a citation enclosure with date does not appear, it is correct to
> include the comma immediately following the period which follows "al."
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=3f03423b-b936-415f-b374-296db4343f94&dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement