RE: restricted snap-ins oopsy

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Marbles

unread,
Mar 7, 2007, 9:56:13 PM3/7/07
to
Solved it...whew!...... now I dont have to reset all group policies

If anyone locks them self out of gpedit.msc by using the restrict the use
of snap-ins policy.

Snap-in Creation Failed

The user policies prevent MMC from creating the snap-in
Name: Group Policy Object Editor

The registry key is:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\MMC

RestrictToPermittedSnapins
Reg_Dword
Value 0 - set to 0 to allow access to the group policy

anand vishrant

unread,
Aug 5, 2010, 7:46:01 PM8/5/10
to
Thank you,Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank youThank youThank you Thank
you

url:http://www.ureader.com/msg/12897471.aspx

Shenan Stanley

unread,
Aug 6, 2010, 7:57:20 PM8/6/10
to
anand vishrant wrote:
> Message-ID: <56504ef3bf074270...@newspe.com>
> X-Mailer: http://www.umailcampaign.com, ip log:24.5.20.247
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 22.bb.5446.static.theplanet.com 70.84.187.34
> Path: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl!newspe.com
> Lines: 1
> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl
> microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin:239482

>
> Thank you,Thank you Thank you Thank you Thank youThank youThank you
> Thank you
>
> url:http://www.ureader.com/msg/12897471.aspx

WTF?!

Oh... Responding to a post that is over 3 years in age using something not
really made to do much more than leech binaries. ;-)

Want to know what that was all actually about?
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin/browse_frm/thread/c2dc07228019e1d4/

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


VanguardLH

unread,
Aug 6, 2010, 9:06:49 PM8/6/10
to
Shenan Stanley wrote:

Just another boob using a webnews-for-boobs pretend forum that leeches
through a gateway into Usenet. As is typical of web-based forum
posters, they do a search to find a solution or on-topic discussion but
they don't bother to notice the datestamps.

At least with this webnews-for-boobs Usenet-leeching pretend forum
(ureader), they add headers on which you can filter out their gatewayed
posts:

^Message-ID:\s*<.+@newspe\.com>

Apparently Yardi (who runs ureader.com) operates a 1-way gateway. They
spew out their web forum posts into Usenet but don't retrieve them to
keep the thread(s) intact. Or they are VERY slow: after half an hour,
your reply half hasn't shown up in their forum.

Alas, EggHeadCafe decided to hide their leeched posts into Usenet by
taking out the identifying headers. I used to filter on:

^NNTP-Posting-Host:.+\.dimenoc\.com\b

They switched to Highwinds (a Usenet backbone provider to many 3rd tier
newsgroup providers). The best that I can figure to filter out the
EggHeadCafe boobs is to filter on:

^Path:.*\.highwinds-media\.com!news.*\.iad\.POSTED!5788d997!not-for-mail$

The newsfeed host changes but apparently the 5788d997 identifies their
customer (EggHeadCafe). Worse is that it looks like EggHeadCafe
switched again about 2 days ago to using Giganews and now I can't find
any good headers to filter out their improperly formatted and garbaged
mess for their HTML coded gatewayed posts.

EggHead is also using an invalid MID value. They stick in the poster's
e-mail address despite that EggHead does NOT have permission from the
e-mail provider to use their domain as the domain part of the MID.
That's one fucked up Usenet-leeching pretend forum site.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages