"Paul" <
nos...@needed.com> wrote in message
news:mo41ol$lt5$1...@dont-email.me...
> Adam wrote:
>> "Adam" <
adam@no_thanks.com> wrote in message
>> news:mo2uca$krl$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>> "Barry Schwarz" <
schw...@dqel.com> wrote in message
>>> news:m289qa1vu5kempnlr...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:38:28 -0700, "Adam" <
adam@no_thanks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where can I download WinXP drivers for the following...
>>>>>
>>>>> Dell NW147 56K External USB Modem, Compatible Model Number: RD02-D400
>>>>>
http://www.amazon.com/Dell-NW147-External-Compatible-Number/dp/B001L7IVCK
>>>> Have you tried the Dell website?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Remove del for email
>>>
>>> Thanks, hope this is the right one.
>>>
>>> Conexant D400 External USB 56K Modem Driver for WinXP
>>>
http://www.dell.com/support/home/us/en/19/Drivers/DriversDetails?driverId=JC1CR
>>>
>>
>> Driver was successfully installed.
>>
>> However, I can't seem to send fax using MightyFAX v3.41 via DSL with
>> filter.
>> Sending a minimal cover page takes FOREVER.
>> Same results with other 56k USB modems as well. Why?
>>
>> Is it the software/MightyFAX? But an older MightyFAX v2.9z Build 10 is
>> able to send fax using a PC Card 56k modem in an old laptop running
>> Win98SE via DSL with filter. What gives?
>>
>
> Simple. Change FAX setting from 14400 to 9600.
>
Thanks, (Guru Paul) I took a snapshot of the "Send Fax" dialog that
shows the Connect BPS to be 9600.
I can upload the snapshot but to which website?
> VOIP does not typically handle FAX tones well, and
> so dropping to 9600 baud FAX mode may help.
>
Yes, thanks for your detailed diagram and explanation posted to
the following thread..."how to connect PC Card Modem to laptop - please
help"
=================================================================
"Paul" <
nos...@needed.com> wrote in message
news:itrm6l$9v3$1...@dont-email.me...
news:ir7547$l4l$1...@dont-email.me...
> >> "ED" <
xxa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ir746m$gq2$1...@dont-email.me...
> >>> news:ir71jb$3ma$1...@dont-email.me...
> >>>> Operating System: Windows XP
> >>>> PC Card Modem: Psion Gold Card Global 56k + Fax
> >>>>
> >>>> My old laptop had a couple of PC Card slots,
> >>>> one of which was used for a PC Card Modem.
> >>>> Now, I am interested in connecting this PC Card Modem to
> >>>> my new Windows XP laptop, which does not have PC Card slots.
> >>>> So, I am looking for a good PC Card Reader. Any suggestions?
> >>>> Or, is there a better approach?
> >>>>
> >>> One of the following should suit your purpose:
> >>>
> >
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH
> >> &Description=usb+modem+56k
> >> Thanks!!
> >>
> >> Unless I hear otherwise, I guess I'll try the following ...
> >> Rosewill RNX-56USB Conexant Hardware Based 56Kbps USB (Plug & Play)
> >> V.92
> >> Data/Fax/TAM Modem
> >>
> >
> > It looks like I may need a PCMCIA USB adapter after all in order to
> > salvage my PC Card Fax Modem (which works with DSL) after all.
> > The problem is that many fax modems will not work with DSL.
> > And, Rosewill Tech Support just confirmed this.
> >
> > Anyone with DSL using a 56k fax modem to send fax? If so,
> > what's the make/model of your 56k fax modem?
>
> [Note - copy and paste the below into Notepad or equivalent,
> and use Courier font, if you want to view the diagrams as I
> drew them.]
>
> I think before running off to the store, I'd slow down a bit first.
>
> There are many kinds of phone lines, but some are obscure enough
> we don't have to worry about them.
>
> Two common situations now, involve "ordinary POTS" versus VOIP.
>
> The definition of POTS is here - it's the old copper phone
> line we had in the 50's, with 4KHz or lower bandwidth.
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_old_telephone_service
>
> Some telephone companies are eliminating POTS service, in favor of
> VOIP solutions. There might not even be a customer premise piece
> of equipment doing the VOIP, so the difference might not even be
> apparent to the home owner.
>
> We can take my house as an example. I still have POTS, plus they
> added ADSL to the line. I don't own a FAX machine, but if I did,
> it would work. I can add at least four filters and taps to the
> line if I want (I own four filters). Only one analog phone can
> go off-hook at a time, so there is only "one line".
>
> 28KHz-1MHz DSL RJ45
> Telco --------------------+---------------+----- ADSL
> modem ------------
Computer
> 4KHz baseband | | ethernet
> Filter Filter
> 4KHz or lower 4KHz or lower
> | |
> analog phone analog FAX
> RJ11 connector RJ11 connector
>
> In the previous diagram, I would be running a traditional, clunky,
> standalone FAX machine. No computer involvement in the faxing process
> in that example.
>
> Now, if I wanted, I could use a FAX modem on the computer, like this.
>
> 28KHz-1MHz DSL RJ45
> Telco --------------------+---------------+----- ADSL
> modem ------------
Computer
> 4KHz baseband | | ethernet
|
> Filter Filter
USB FAX
> 4KHz or lower 4KHz or lower
Modem
> | |
|
> analog phone
+---------------------------------+
> RJ11 connector RJ11 connector
>
> The previous diagram also works, because of the regular, reliable 4KHz
> passband.
>
> When the telephone company stops supporting POTS, they use VOIP or
> voice over internet protocol. That can involve the ADSL modem. So
> only the modem "sees" the phone line, like this. Now, there is
> no 4KHz analog content at all. Just the modulation above 28KHz for
> ADSL. The ADSL sees the full spectrum, just as before, because there
> is no filter in front of the ADSL modem.
>
> 28KHz-1MHz DSL RJ45
> Telco --------------------+---------------+----- ADSL
> modem ------------
Computer
> ethernet
>
> To make it more transparent as to what is happening, now I add VOIP to the
picture,
> and also include a router for more computers. VOIP is "downstream" of the
> modem, and "upstream" of the router. The reason the first implementations
> sat upstream of the router, was to make it easier to access all the port
> numbers used by VOIP protocols (control path and data path). So this
> diagram,
> compresses that useless wire in the middle of the picture, to make more
> room for the other junk.
>
> 28KHz-1MHz DSL RJ45 RJ45
> RJ45
> Telco ------------------ ADSL modem ---- VOIP 2 Port Box ----
Router ----- Computer
> | RJ11 |
----- Computer
> | |
> (4KHz) (4KHz)
> analog analog
> phone FAX
>
> Now, again, I can replace that clunky, separate "analog FAX" machine, with
> a FAX modem on the computer. I'll run a line from the second computer,
> which has a USB FAX or PCMCIA FAX device plugged into it.
>
> 28KHz-1MHz DSL RJ45
> Telco ------------------ ADSL modem ---- VOIP 2 Port Box ----
Router ----- Computer
> | RJ11 |
----- Computer
> | |
|
> (4KHz) (4KHz)
USB FAX
> analog |
Modem
> phone |
|
>
+----------------------------+
> RJ11 connector
>
> Now, what you're attempting to do, is run "FAX over VOIP". This is not the
same
> as running "FAX over 4KHz baseband", as in the first diagram.
>
> And that's what you need to research. What impairment does using VOIP
> to *emulate* an analog phone service cause ? You need to be absolutely
> certain, you know how your telephone company (or you yourself) have
> arranged to make that "phone line" you're using. VOIP is a lot different
> than an old POTS copper line.
>
> So it's not really an argument about how sweet a particular
> brand of FAX modem happens to be. It's an argument about
> whether the phone line is "plain" or "VOIP" type.
>
> In some households, the "VOIP box" is in the pedestal or outside
> the house, and the home owner may not even be aware they're on
> VOIP. Depending on when you did your setup (like some of
> my samples above), you as the home owner may already be
> aware you're using VOIP, because you actually own a VOIP
> box sitting in the room with you.
>
> Try search terms, such as "FAX over VOIP". One web page,
> tries to sell you a different IP protocol to send faxes
> (presumably, with a monthly bill). This web page, talks
> of dropping the FAX transmission rate, to make it work.
> The success or failure, might even depend on delay jitter
> in the VOIP service. Who knows...
>
> (site uses a lot of popup crap...)
>
http://askbobrankin.com/fax_over_voip.html
>
> "The best tip I can offer is to reduce your fax transmission speed to
> 9600 bps to maximize VoIP fax success rates. The faster one tries to
> send a fax, the more likely it is to fail on a VoIP connection."
>
> Now, back to the discussion about which FAX modem is superior
> to which other FAX modem :-)
>
> Have fun,
> Paul
=================================================================
There's also a good explanation and diagram link here...
Modems, Faxes and VoIP
http://www.almcom.net/Modems_and_VoIP.html
http://www.almcom.net/voipandpstn.html
Now it's crystal clear to me why not to send FAX over IP yet.
Voice is okay because voice is more forgiving.
The RJ11 connector is connected to the DSL filter,
which I doubt is VOIP since the old laptop is able to send FAX successfully.
Old laptop FAX setup (which is able to send FAX)...
OS / FAX software: Win98SE / MightyFAX v2.9z Build 10
PC Card Modem: Psion Gold Card Global 56k + Fax
Current laptop FAX setup (which fails to send FAX)...
OS / FAX software: Windows XP / MightyFAX v3.41
USB Modem: Dell NW147 56K USB Modem, Compatible Model Number: RD02-D400
[same for Rosewill RNX-56USB and TRENDnet
TFM-561U]
> Paul