https://www.askwoody.com/category/windows-10-releases/
"Microsoft’s been testing it since December"
Yes, I saw a 19041 a long time ago, possibly on the Insider disk.
But it's the same old problem it's always been. What they ship in
May, bears no resemblance to what staff are dogfooding or what
Insiders test.
The testing platforms are to check "active areas of development".
"Does my new spinning Cortana icon look nice?" That's what the
testing determines.
It seems to be assumed the driver side of things is working,
and they tend to "pour a driver set into the box at the last minute".
That's just my personal impression, based on how the release one
never quite seems to work the same as the beta edition. With the
NVidia thing, they should be running nightly regressions to
check that older WDDM continue to work. (So the Win10 on this
machine can work! Thanks.)
And when Avast or CCleaner installs don't quite work right (stuff
that's presumably under active development), that just smells bad.
The company involved has access to 19041 for internal usage, and
could be dealing with changes on what is presumed to be a "frozen"
release. The release number does not stay at 19041 as a joke.
If they're doing new builds, then this should be reflected
in the build number being advanced.
If they did it properly, then we'd know *why* it's like this.
As the bumped build number would tell you "whoa, untested stuff",
just like is happening in practice.
There's something about the way the cake is made, which isn't
right.
And the problems with Always On device (perhaps S0ic ACPI option),
now why is that changing at the last minute ? ACPI behavior should
be frozen into the 19041 release freeze, it shouldn't be something
where "lets just pour in these code changes at the last minute,
untested, and release". I can't see the profit in pouring
untested ACPI code into *anything*. That's nuts.
Generally, the spectrum of problems does not indicate good curation
or buildmeistering.
What the hell is the point of "testing since December", if you
have no discipline ? Just admit you have no discipline, and set
the fucking build number accordingly. At least then, the numerical
evidence will match the experience, versus the symptoms being
"such a mystery, aliens did it". Well, I don't think ET messed
up their SOic code (that's something I don't have in the
computer room fortunately, you Surface customers enjoy
yourselves :-) )
Paul