Besides something called NAP service, I thought that SP3 was (at the
time of it's release) just a roll-up of various SP2 patches. No?
I also heard some claims back when SP3 was in beta that SP3 system
performance was 5 to 10% faster than current SP2. Are the
previously-claimed performance benefits of SP3 true? Do they still hold?
Were they bogus?
If there are differences in important system files between fully updated
SP2 and current SP3 versions, then what files are we talking about, and
what are the differences? For example, has DRM been strengthened in SP3?
This microsoft link really doesn't explain the differences between SP2
and SP3 going forward:
Performance here is about the same. I suspect it is about the same
everywhere.
The only real difference is when full support for the two versions ends.
SP2 - 2010; SP3 - 2014. I'll be 84 by the time support stops for SP3. It
does seem to me that I may not be doing much computing by 2014.
Jim
We had a number of people at work find that Internet Explorer would
no longer display some pages correctly after they installed XP SP3.
This included a page I wrote, that displays just fine in IE6, IE7,
Firefox, and Mozilla and passes validation of its HTML and CSS.
There were also problems wih some Office programs not wprking right,
if I recall correctly. Anyway, our IT department ended up
uninstalling SP3.
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com
Shikata ga nai...
>
> The only real difference is when full support for the two versions ends.
> SP2 - 2010; SP3 - 2014. I'll be 84 by the time support stops for SP3. It
> does seem to me that I may not be doing much computing by 2014.
> Jim
>
2012 is the end of the Mayan calendar any ways.
We will be back to the abacus.
"Jim" <j...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:ObfApyKW...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...