just to let everybody know that I'm running windows 7 Beta for test and all
that I can tell you is wow bug mania, internet Exployer 8 ouch your lucky to
launch that twice in one windows session that you have, as far as the
printers and devices is that whole lot of white screen, I'm very proud to say
that the release of windows vista even though that it has bad comments from
friends/customers and family, me in the other hand love it, that there has a
little twieks of how programs that have to be instailled but not too much of
a headache least it is more reliable not like this windows 7, so far I have
the "blue screen of death" just by plugging in my sd card thats sooo great
got to love that old xp techology with a snappy vista look all I can say in
this message is that don't be too proud of this windows, and try not to
instaill application drivers it don't like it!
HUH???
So, Redmond is undercutting its own position on the market.
If you have no e-mail nor news-reader and instead you're
left with sticky browser as IE8 is, you better think twice
before you buy any PC... There is an open source or Leopard X
left...-;)
Vista Rookie is right "a browser should include an email client."
May be we should be more selective in future.
>
> "VistaRookie" <VistaRook...@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com> wrote in
> message news:VistaRook...@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com...
>>
>> I think a browser should include an email client.
>> I also feel, after all these years, a certain standard
>> has developed. Removing those apps makes me
>> feel cheated, whether they would be totally free to
>> download or not. And there is the issue of the time
>> involved in doing my own installations.
>>
>> I do not agree that it is the right direction. The right
>> direction might be to include everything and allow
>> people to uninstall them if they don't want to use them.
>>
>> I also do not agree with an email client that doesn't
>> allow all the creativity possible. It would be better
>> to include an updated version of OE, even if it had
>> a name change than to push WLM.
>>
>> ps - I don't like bloat, however, Vista is snappy
>> enough for me, as is.
>>
>>
>> Gary VanderMolen;1132321 Wrote:
>>> Hyperbole aside, Windows 7 is notably snappier than Vista.
>>> Being able to choose one's own apps instead of incurring
>>> the overhead of unwanted included apps is a step in the right
>>> direction, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary VanderMolen, MS-MVP (Mail)
>>>
>>>
>>> "Steve Cochran" <scoc...@oehelp.com> wrote in message
>>> news:26765554-EA61-4051...@microsoft.com...
>>> > Its permanent. MS has decided to dumb down Windows.
>>> >
>>> > In Windows 8 one will have to get Windows Live Calculator and Windows
>>> Live Notepad. And in Windows 9 one will have to get
>>> > Windows Live Windows.
>>> >
>>> > steve
>>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> VistaRookie
>> Posted via http://www.vistaheads.com
>>
>
So far, Windows 7 has been very stable and had good performance marks,
finally persuaded me to leave Windows XP and even more impressive, Ubuntu
8.10 and Linux Mint. However, I don't think I'm just ready to shell out the
(probably) 300$ for the Ultimate final version.
I'd really like to participate in a Windows 7 discussion board/newsgroup,
aside of the public ones riddled with spam and comments posted by '13 year
old fail whalers'.
On 1/17/09 10:25 AM, in article
7F74D4A3-4910-420B...@microsoft.com, "Philip Stark"
Its in beta, thats what beta testing is all about. If Microsoft bring out
another o/s that is hated as much as Vista has been (well thats how it looks
to me) I think they have shot it ! Windows 7 has to build on the rock solid
platform of Windows XP.