In article <
528e40f618acf543...@haph.org>
Anonymous <
nob...@haph.org> wrote:
>
> Anonymous <
anon...@anonymous.com> wrote:
>
> >
https://www.popsci.com/choose-your-DNS
>
> CloudFlare is a surveillance company spreading like cancer. It collects user
> data by reverse proxying an immense amount of websites, and establishing a
> nameserver adds another valuable monitoring vector to that task.
>
> Who wants to use the service of a company that supports annoying Tor users?
>
> Try to visit
> <
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/02/24/cloudflare_may_stop_captcha_tor_users/>
> with the Tor browser and you'll see
>
> | Please turn JavaScript on and reload the page.
> | DDoS protection by Cloudflare
> | Ray ID: 41afe0129e2f3cc5
>
> JavaScript for DDoS prevention?
>
> No, those interested in privacy should stay away from such evildoers and start
> using distributed user-controlled name servers like the OpenNIC system.
>
> <
https://wiki.opennic.org/start>
If anyone is interested.
Gave 1.1.1.1 a run for 24 hours. Response seems sluggish and
lookup performance not that good.
It has now been removed.