James Chong (MVP)
MCITP | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+,
Security+, Project+, ITIL
msexchangetips.blogspot.com
Conditional Forwaders:
Pros:
No configuration required on Primary server
No ongoing maintenance (unless the master changes)
Can be DS Integrated in both Domain and Forest if AD is in use
Cons:
If the Primary is down you won't resolve names unless cached
If the Primary changes IP you won't resolve names until fixed
Secondary Zones:
Pros:
Full off-server copy (Read Only)
Allows resolution of names within zone if Primary is unavailable
Valid until Expiry value set in SOA record (can be set to a large value,
months if required)
Allows replication of DNS data without DS Integrated Zones
Cons:
Requires permission to Transfer on Primary
Cannot be DS Integrated (must be configured on each server)
Occasionally troublesome if values for NS Records become out of date
Generally speaking I'd term Secondaries better where fault tolerance is
required. If connections and servers are reliable and consistent service
isn't as big an issue Conditional Forwarders are possibly better.
--
Chris Dent
MVP - Directory Services
"jamestechman" <jamest...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ae09db4-b7ad-4b9e...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
James Chong (MVP)
MCITP | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+,
Security+, Project+, ITIL
msexchangetips.blogspot.com
> "jamestechman" <jamestech...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5ae09db4-b7ad-4b9e...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > What's pros and cons of doing either a conditional forwarding or
> > hosting a secondary zone? Is there a compelling reason to do either
> > or? Thanks.
>
> > James Chong (MVP)
> > MCITP | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+,
> > Security+, Project+, ITIL
> > msexchangetips.blogspot.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Chris
"jamestechman" <jamest...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:301a46c3-07f9-4b2f...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
In news:C43C86E4-C46B-4DB3...@microsoft.com,
Chris Dent [MVP] <ch...@highorbit.co.uk> wrote:
> Cons:
>
> Requires permission to Transfer on Primary
> Cannot be DS Integrated (must be configured on each server)
> Occasionally troublesome if values for NS Records become out of date
>
> Generally speaking I'd term Secondaries better where fault tolerance
> is required. If connections and servers are reliable and consistent
> service isn't as big an issue Conditional Forwarders are possibly
> better.
One major additional Con for a secondary zone, if the Primary is a dynamic
DNS zone with even just a few clients or servers registering in the Master.
Every time the master is updated, the Secondary will request a zone
transfer, which will be logged in the event log, and even with a few clients
updating DNS the log will begin to fill the log and possibly cause event
3000 warnings for Run-time events (Events happening in rapid succession).
--
Best regards,
Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]
Hope This Helps
===================================
When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group"
via your newsreader so that others may learn and
benefit from your issue, to respond directly to
me remove the nospam. from my email address.
===================================
http://www.lonestaramerica.com/
http://support.wftx.us/
http://message.wftx.us/
===================================
Use Outlook Express?... Get OE_Quotefix:
It will strip signature out and more
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
===================================
Keep a back up of your OE settings and folders
with OEBackup:
http://www.oehelp.com/OEBackup/Default.aspx
===================================
--
Oz Ozugurlu
MVP (Exchange)
MCITP (EMA), MCITP (SA)
MCSE 2003, M+, S+, MCDST
Security+, Project +, Server +
o...@SMTp25.org
http://smtp25.blogspot.com (Blog)