"Neil" is a pimply-faced kid -- in way over his depth.
He can only transmit and not receive.
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
"Neil" <nrg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cFehl.11585$W06...@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com...
>>> But you really are playing devil's advocate here, aren't you? This
>>> discussion's becoming a waste of time.
>>
>> No, you're growing bored in not getting the answers that you want. OE
>> isn't going to change. You're the one beating the dead horse expecting
>> its behavior to change.
>
> My word, you just won't stop, will you? Do you have some psychotic
> compulsion to be right? Sheesh.
>
> Where did I say I expected OE's behavior to change? Is that just what you
> want to believe so you can keep going on and on about how it's not going
> to change? Pathetic.
>
>> OE was designed to be a "personal" e-mail and newsreader client. It was
>> not designed to be a newgroup server, an archiver, or any functions
>> other than what it does have.
>
> Really? So the fact that OE used to keep downloaded messages, and then
> later changed to not do so anymore (see posts from others in this thread,
> if you don't believe me), doesn't factor into your nonsense that OE has
> "always been this way," and it was "designed this way." I wouldn't want to
> step on your ideological toes; but you're wrong. It did have functions
> other than what it does have. You just can't accept that because it would
> shatter your belief in what a reader's "supposed to do."
>
>>> Again, a ridiculous waste of time.
>>
>> Well, then why did you start this conversation? You demand that only
>> replies that help you alter the product's behavior can be posted here?
>
> No, but you keep repeating yourself over and over again, thinking somehow
> that if you say enough times that OE was originally designed the way it
> currently works, and that it should not work any differently, that I'll
> accept your false statements. Your repeating the same thing over and over
> is a waste of time. I heard you the first few times. Now just move on.
>
>>> And, again, this isn't way OE used to work (your above statements
>>> notwithstanding).
>>
>> OE hasn't changed this functionality since OE5.
>
> And yet you wrote above:
>
>> OE was designed to be a "personal" e-mail and newsreader client. It was
>> not designed to be a newgroup server, an archiver, or any functions
>> other than what it does have.
>
> If it wasn't designed to have "any functions other than what it does
> have," then why did it, indeed, have those other functions (of retaining
> downloaded messages) prior to OE5? Again, this discussion's a waste of
> time.
You're too funny! When I read these things you write, I initially start
cracking up at how ridiculous they are. Then I'm filled with empathy and
pity at what a sad individual you must be to feel the need to continually
follow me around and write such things. I mean, seriously: this is very sad.
Please get a life.
Indeed...
Such as Forte Agent.
But he is far too thick to realize that.
So he has to be repeatedly hit upside the head with a 2 by 4.
D. Spencer Hines
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
Vires et Honor
Veni, Vidi, Calcitravi Asinum
"NormanM" <spamme...@immoral.invalid> wrote in message
news:1saumduoaabja$.dlg@on-line.service.invalid...
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:14:07 -0600, Neil wrote:
>
>> I'm using OE6 as my newsgroup reader. I keep losing my already-downloaded
>> headings from newsgroups. Very frustrating. I want to keep them.
>>
>> Under Options, Maintenance, I have every box UNCHECKED, and all my
>> subscribed newsgroups are set to Don't Synchronize. What am I doing
>> wrong?
>> How can I keep OE from periodically deleting my downloaded headers?
>
> MS Outlook Express was designed as an "online newsreader". What you need
> is an "offline newsreader".
steve
"D. Spencer Hines" <pan...@excelsior.com> wrote in message
news:uYw7FfFh...@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...