Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Minimum System Requirements

0 views
Skip to first unread message

NathanInBremerton

unread,
Jul 23, 2005, 9:44:02 PM7/23/05
to
I'm pretty new to these forums. I was trying to find some information on the
SysReq's for Vista AKA Longhorn. Since the GUI looks so pretty, I'd imagine
you'd need a graphics accelerator to run it... Any hints as to the minimums?

Mike Brannigan [MSFT]

unread,
Jul 24, 2005, 12:32:41 PM7/24/05
to
"NathanInBremerton" <NathanIn...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:53C87D76-9193-4ADB...@microsoft.com...

When we make the Beta 1 available to those under the various programs to
test it - we will provide guidance on specifications etc to those users.
These specs will be subject to change and final recommendation will only
arise when we reach the end of development and are close to releasing the
product.

--

Regards,

Mike

Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups

"NathanInBremerton" <NathanIn...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:53C87D76-9193-4ADB...@microsoft.com...

Pablo Fernicola [MS]

unread,
Jul 29, 2005, 3:06:36 AM7/29/05
to
In relation to graphics and other specifications, you can check out this
document from WinHEC
http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/1/3/913ff560-d050-43a3-b17c-7e9deef415e4/WLPDraft051.doc

For a computer to receive a Vista logo, it will need to have a Dx9 level
graphics part (or better) and a LDDM driver for that part.

-Pablo

"Mike Brannigan [MSFT]" <mike...@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23QPLT1G...@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

Windows Vista RAM Hog

unread,
Mar 31, 2006, 11:13:01 PM3/31/06
to
Aero should be pretty, but not to the point we can't edit on how it takes
RAM. I'd personally disable it so I can achieve maximum preformance on my
computer.

I would however, like to see Windows Vista take far less RAM and Processor
and VRAM resources. It's extremely wasteful to productivity of fun and
business.

Andre Da Costa [Extended64]

unread,
May 17, 2006, 7:32:57 AM5/17/06
to
The minimum amount of vRAM allowed is 64-MBs, I think thats fair. Also, its
currently not optimized for performance, I would give BETA 2 try when it
becomes available.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Windows Vista RAM Hog" <WindowsVi...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message news:CEA70CE0-539B-43E2...@microsoft.com...

Attellati

unread,
Jan 4, 2008, 1:15:01 AM1/4/08
to
Hi Nathan,

Don't miss out on getting Vista it's the cream of the crop! I think you do
need a graphic accelerator, not only that, you might want to get a 512-1GB
RAM, 100GB hard disk drive, 75hertz LCD monitor and that's basically it but
they're the basic system's requirements you need to get Vista running on your
PC. You said it looks so pretty, well that's the reason why you need a faster
graphics accelerator ... so your PC won't get bogged down when opening
folders and programs. But it's worth the pain, you'll have a more efficient,
faster-running and more responsive operating system. So I recommend you get
these things right away.

Cheers,

Attellati
--
Attellati

0 new messages