I'd like one for fast 3D win apps, and one with sharper 2D display
quality for DOS apps.
Thank you for any help, best regards from Robert.
Your problem is going to be confirming that the two cards are compatible,
considering the small choice you'll likely have for cards that have W98
support.
Also, by trying to get one fast and one sharp you might end up with a system
which is neither - generally the best rule is to choose two cards that are
as similar as possible and concentrate on optimising one feature only.
--
Jeff Richards
MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User)
"rpgs rock dvds" <rpgsro...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:47a19abe-c7f5-49a3...@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Yes.
Actually, I'm pretty sure you can fill up all your PCI slots with
video cards and they will all work on Win-98.
I also think that win-98 is not limited to how many monitors /
display-adapters you can have (but win-xp home is limited to only one
or two).
> I'd like one for fast 3D win apps, and one with sharper 2D display
> quality for DOS apps.
There really is no basis for you to distinguish between two different
video cards on that basis.
In other words, any video card you are likely to use would have equal
ability to generate a sharp display for DOS apps.
You should also note that many video cards (even cards that are 4
years old) have dual-display capability (they are essentially 2
display adapters and will drive 2 separate monitors) and you can get a
card like that (Nvidia or ATI) in either AGP or PCI. They are also
known as "dual-head" because they will drive 2 monitors
simultaneously.
Thanks very much for your help.
Thanks very much for your help.