Otherwise the cache system for the Celeron was not designed to work on a
server. It was made for client apps like games and texteditors.
Explain: A server app runs so much more code in different ways that the L1
cache (and the missing l2 cache) will cause your code running some 2 to 3
slower than a pentium II or even 4 times slower than a pentium XEON
I think general your webserver will be cheaper than a PII 600 but it will be
even fast as a dual celeron 400
"Nick" <nd...@ic.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:e8iXVmrK$GA....@cppssbbsa02.microsoft.com...
Second, Winnt Server 4 defaults to only use 256 L2 cache (no matter what the
processor). The registry must be physically edited to maximize performance.
Go to regedit.com to for steps on how to do this.
SO... my answer is, if Windows 2000 Server automatically recognizes the size
of your L2 cache then your chips will run about the same as older NT 4
Servers. LOL.
Also, don't forget that you can easily overclock Celerons to meet
performance needs. A Celeron 300A will run (not install) NT server 4 at
463Mhz without problems. I know because I have done it.