"CJack" <shaz...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2e52a6a3.02063...@posting.google.com...
--
Alec
asor...@gaul.csd.uwo.ca
"Daniel Cohen Gindi" <dcg...@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:uHDflAEICHA.1600@tkmsftngp13...
LOL. Restore from backup?
You may as well begin work on rewriting it coz in the long run any effort
you put into reverse engineering it will be wasted. Get over your loss,
learn from your mistakes and get the IDE out.
--
russ.
http://www.gipsysoft.com/ - Code, tips and cool stuff!
http://www.gipsysoft.com/qhtm/ - FREE HTML display in a small and light DLL
http://www.gipsysoft.com/ZoomPlus/ - Programmers Zoom Utility on Steroids
You can't recreate source code, you can't recreate classes, you can barely, with only
massive effort, recreate simple structs, and there is little if any hope of reconstructing
even simple C code from optimized machine code. I had a friend who got his PhD back around
1974 or so for decompiling optimized code into what we would now recognize as a trivial
subset of C code (no structs, for example); the problem is fundamentally HARD. I'd have
trouble doing it, and I'm a fairly serious compiler expert. I wouldn't touch a probject
like this.
I'd consider a moderate-sized subroutine to be challenging. I'd consider any serious
application impossible. You could probably rewrite it faster than you could
reverse-engineer it, and get a far better result.
Bottom line: you're probably out of luck. In several ways. Even a disassembler isn't going
to help you very much.
joe
Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
email: newc...@flounder.com
Web: http://www3.pgh.net/~newcomer
MVP Tips: http://www3.pgh.net/~newcomer/mvp_tips.htm