Am 22.10.2012 14:32, schrieb Clive Lumb:
> Are both laptops totally identical other than the RAM?
> Different video chipsets can make a huge difference, audio chipsets have
> an influenence, even NICs and their drivers.
> Also check that the jumpy one isn't in dual monitor mode (a favourite
> for slowing down videos)
I think Deannas guess (USB-related problems) is the most likely cause.
On some older MainBoards (or Notebooks) not all USB-
Ports are already USB 2.0 ones.
And even *if* the machine with the slow performance is
completely equipped with USB2.0 ports, there's huge
performance-differences in some chipsets with regards
to USB 2.0 throughput.
And those USB-WebCams stress the USB (2.0) channel up
to its theoretical maximum-netto-transferrates (about
25MB/sec), especially when high-res frames have to be
pumped over the USB-wire.
Also the current USB(2.0)-drivers of the current WIn-OS-
installation can cause larger differences (there were
different USB2.0 fixes, not only for Win98, but also still
for XP (only with XP/SP3 there's a slight guarantee, that
the USB2.0 stuff works well also in the faster "burst-modes").
Tip for BeeJ - please enable (in TaskManager) also the
visualization of the "Kernel-Times" (shown as a red-colored
curve in the cpu-load-graph).
If the red curve nearly occupies all of the available
CPU-resources, then the problem lies in the USB-drivers
performance, not in the performance of the Application,
which handles the incoming frames.
Olaf