Is there an Access 2010 addin that offers support for Microsoft Team
Foundation Server 2010?
Please help.
Thank you.
John L.
You may try SourceAnywhere for VSS, which is a remote access add-on
tool for SourceSafe.
http://www.dynamsoft.com/Products/SAW_Overview.aspx
Here you can see how to integrate SourceAnywhere for VSS with Access:
http://kb.dynamsoft.com/questions/369/How+to+integrate+SourceAnywhere+for+VSS+with+MS+Access%3F
Thanks,
---------------------
Catherine Sea
http://www.dynamsoft.com
http://www.scmsoftwareconfigurationmanagement.com
My precise questions are as follows:
1. Does Microsoft intend to release a VSS addin designed to support the
latest Access 2010 64-bit edition?
2. If not, is there an Access 2010 addin that offers support for Microsoft
Team Foundation Server 2010?
3. If not, does Microsoft offer any solution for source control in Access
2010 64-bit? Is there anything planned for 64-bit Access development
environments?
4. I appreciate the information about SourceAnywhere. Do you know if that
supports the 64-bit edition of Microsoft Access 2010?
Thank you for the information.
"Catherine Sea" wrote:
> .
>
Thank you.
I think SourceAnywhere should work with 64-bit Access 2010. I will do
some tests and get back to you.
Regards,
I confirmed with our team and SourceAnywhere for VSS works with 64-bit
Access 2010.
Does *Microsoft* intend to release a VSS addin designed to support the
latest Access 2010 64-bit edition? If not, is there anything in the
pipeline from Microsoft?
Thanks.
John L.
"Catherine Sea" wrote:
> .
>
I don't work for Microsoft so I'm not sure whether Microsoft has a
plan for this. You may contact the support of Microsoft and see.
SourceAnywhere for VSS is a VSS add-on tool recommended by Microsoft.
It can provide you fast and secure remote access to your VSS database
and also allows you to access your database from Linux, Mac etc.
You may have a try.
http://www.dynamsoft.com/Products/SAW_Overview.aspx
I am not interested in SourceAnywhere at this time because it is too
expensive, but thank you very much for mentioning it.
"Catherine Sea" wrote:
> .
>