Lexmark laser printers: any good?

[Mister Scary]

I am looking at getting a full duplex color laser printer. The problem is
that user reviews on the web indicate that HP's quality is not what it used
to be. The only other manufacturer who makes printers that are just like
what I am looking for is Lexmark. But how good are they? I can't find any
reviews of their laser products.

[magrat_...@hotmail.com]

On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:19:40 +0100, Mister Scary wrote
(in article <OrMJiVfq...@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>):

And what, exactly, does this have to with MS Publisher? Why aren't you
posting to a group that discusses laser printers?

[같MS-Publisher같]

HP today is junk and service and drivers from HP is non-existent
Kyocera and Epson are currently the best color laser printers in the market place
My choice for reliability and low cost of running would be Kyocera.

Ignore the very sick mental defective blitisher witch who posted
She is a very sick person who interferes with minors and registered with the
authorities.

"Mister Scary" <daniel_...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OrMJiVfq...@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...

[Jim]

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:13:21 +1000, "같MS-Publisher같" <www.serif.com>
wrote:

>HP today is junk and service and drivers from HP is non-existent
>Kyocera and Epson are currently the best color laser printers in the market place
>My choice for reliability and low cost of running would be Kyocera.
>
>Ignore the very sick mental defective blitisher witch who posted
>She is a very sick person who interferes with minors and registered with the
>authorities.
>

Oh. Is she the one who defected to Mac, like her male counterpart who
defected to Page Plus? Just askin', Dave...

Blessed be, for sure...

[Brian Kvalheim [MSFT MVP]]

같MS-Publisher같 wrote:
> HP today is junk and service and drivers from HP is non-existent
> Kyocera and Epson are currently the best color laser printers in the
> market place My choice for reliability and low cost of running would
> be Kyocera.

HP is the best DAVID! How many times do I have to tell you that! :-)
--
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.

[Jim]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:35:01 -0700, Tom has no friends
<Tomhasn...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>Not true about HP we have a HP here at work and it has been excellent we
>recently had to have some problems fixed under warranty and that was no
>problem at all.

This topic could be a real can of worms! All answers about Lexmark
would have the same characteristics as answers about Canon, HP, Epson,
etc.: completely subjective. Whatever brand is under discussion, some
will swear by 'em, and some will swear at 'em!
Blessed be, for sure...

[JoAnn Paules [MSFT MVP]]

Amen to that. Everyone has their preferences. I try not to blast the brands
that I wouldn't own - someone won't agree with me and then all they want to
do is to convince me I'm wrong. I have better things to do than defend a
company that doesn't put food on my table.

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]

"Jim" <grizzlyAIN'T...@cascocastle.com> wrote in message
news:foegi19f353d9htrs...@4ax.com...