Echo
Christopher James wrote:
> Is there a show/hide gridlines control for tables ?
> (like the one in Word) .
> I find the show/hide gridlines feature a real help , since I mainly use
> 'invisible' tables as a layout aid .
>
> Christopher
Echo
MS PPT MVP
Christopher James wrote:
> office2000
>
> --
>
> Christopher
>
> echos <ec...@indy.net> wrote in message news:3A0CCB2A...@indy.net...
So for the meanwhile , I'll have to resort to my own wee ' borders invisible
toggle ' macro .
What's so good about gridlines is that they NEVER print .
Hence one can do a layout and keep the gridlines (table border positions) in
view , and they will never print .
Also very useful when one has very many tables over a few pages , some with
black borders for printing , others with invisible borders .
Happens quite often .
I've done very few documents which don't use mixed tables like this .
These features can all be faked up with borders on/off macros , its just a
lot more user effort .
One criticism of Word is that it is 'sprawling' .
I note that tables are improving with each release of PowerPoint .
Good .
Christopher
Brian Reilly, MS MVP <br...@reillyand.com> wrote in message
news:3a0ccc99...@msnews.microsoft.com...
Another suggestion is to use excel "tables". They keep the gridlines
showing until you turn them off in Tools, Options
Kathy
Christopher James wrote:
>
> Thanks Brian ,
> But I'm talking about gridlines , not borders .
> A rather useful feature of Word tables is that borders are a graphical
> layer on top of the underlying (abstract) gridlines .
> I gather that the gridline layer is missing in PowerPoint tables so far .
>
> So for the meanwhile , I'll have to resort to my own wee ' borders invisible
> toggle ' macro .
>
> What's so good about gridlines is that they NEVER print .
> Hence one can do a layout and keep the gridlines (table border positions) in
> view , and they will never print .
> Also very useful when one has very many tables over a few pages , some with
> black borders for printing , others with invisible borders .
> Happens quite often .
> I've done very few documents which don't use mixed tables like this .
> These features can all be faked up with borders on/off macros , its just a
> lot more user effort .
>
> One criticism of Word is that it is 'sprawling' .
> I note that tables are improving with each release of PowerPoint .
> Good .
>
> Christopher
>
> Brian Reilly, MS MVP <br...@reillyand.com> wrote in message
> news:3a0ccc99...@msnews.microsoft.com...
Yes , we can hand over a chunk of the screen to Word or Excel .
I regret that this has never turned out to be of any real use to me .
Some folks may well like it .
When I use tables , I pretty well always have drawn objects beneath them ( I
produce teaching aids ) .
Problem with the Word tables in PPT , in my application , is they mask out
their screen space .
That said , I think I'll manage to live with PPT's native tables .
I'm glad to hear that they are in the process of being improved through each
new version of PPT .
Plus .... let's not leave the impression that Word tables are such wonders
!!
They certainly aren't .
The interface , various dialogs etc . , for manipulating tables in Word is
so utterly crap that I have had to rewrite all the functions I use into a
suite of VBA macros which I use to change the properties and positions of
tables .
Tables in Word , as found , are indeed , far too clever by half .
Incredibly , the Word2000 dialogs are actually MORE confusing than those in
Word97 .
And I'm supposed to be fond of Word ( says I to me ) !
Christopher
Kathy Huntzinger <pkh...@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:3A0D6045...@mvps.org...