Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Big Bertha Thing dwarf

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Tony Lance

unread,
Sep 15, 2011, 11:59:51 AM9/15/11
to
Big Bertha Thing dwarf
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
http://www.bigberthathing.com/dwarf.html
42K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring Access site
Newsgroup Reviews including alt.astronomy

White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars, And Black Holes

v1.0
01 sep 99
greg goebel
public domain

Contents List:-

1.THE DISCOVERY OF WHITE DWARFS

2.WHITE DWARFS AND ELECTRON DEGENERACY

3.THE STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF WHITE DWARFS

4.WHITE DWARFS AND THE AGE OF THE GALAXY

5.BEYOND WHITE DWARFS?

6.NEUTRON STARS DISCOVERED

7.CHARACTERISTICS OF NEUTRON STARS

8.MILLISECOND PULSARS AND OTHER UNUSUAL NEUTRON STARS

9.BLACK HOLES DISCOVERED?

10.MINIHOLES

11.COMMENTS, SOURCES, AND REVISION HISTORY


Big Bertha Thing checklist

Neighbour checklist

1.Your child beaten up?
2.Rat-proof dustbins?
3.Broken windows?
4.You have apologised?
5.Police called out?
6.Security lighting?
7.New fences?
8.No Leylandii?
9.No Russian Vine?
10.No Solicitors letters sent?

Our score is 10, one neighbour scores 1, another scores 5.

Tony Lance
tony...@bigberthathing.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <judema...@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:31:03 +0000
Local: Sat, Feb 10 2007 2:31 pm
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic

Big Bertha Thing strategic

Hi there,
Further to your concern on my 70K postings.
There is one posting per day, cross posted to two newgroups.
The contents are the results from my scientific project.
Another field of interest is spam attack strategic studies.
There are two grounds where off-topic postings are considered to be
on-topic.
One is a review of off-topic postings, which is linked to below.
The other is postings for the benefit of newsgroup users.
Results of logs of attacks on newsgroup users is also linked to
below.
All postings can be filtered using subject big bertha thing.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.
Tony Lance


Big Bertha Thing rim

News from the Asian Rim front.
1. The basic mailing list has 2000 mailboxes. (two-way)
2. The rate of increase is 400 mailboxes per 6 weeks.
3. This gives 4000 mailboxes in 8 months time.
4. The 4th Battle of Cyberspace began on 21st October 2002.
5. There are 2000 new Yahoo mailboxes per 6 weeks. (one-way)
6. Each one has a Big Bertha Thing posting inside it.
7. These are not 2000 world-wide.
8. They are not even 2000 in english.
9. They are 2000 Asian Rim non-english.
10. The 8 months target is 10,000 Yahoo mailboxes closed.
11. The Big Bertha Thing web site shows that one field
of interest is spam attack strategic studies.
12. In theory the first three battles were unwinnable too.
13. The targets of all these mailboxes are newsgroup users.
14. Off-topic postings for the benefit of newsgroups are
considered to be on-topic.
15. Shi Tao got 10 years for email about China after Yahoo
named him to them. (see http)
http://www.out-law.com/page-6482

Actual Count of Yahoo mailboxes closed.
08/11/05 2108 smtp
20/12/05 1791 smtp
31/01/06 1587 smtp
08/02/06 Asian Rim posting published.
21/04/06 1258 smtp
13/10/06 263 filtered
21/01/07 90 smtp (new mailbox)

http://www.1-script.com/forums/Re-Big-Bertha-Thing-blogs-article1957-20.htm


Big Bertha Thing corporate

1. What happened to the guys on the most wanted list?
2. Corporate America opened fire with an industrial
strength denial of service attack.
3. It was complete with worm virus.
4. 150K mailbox postings.
5. Daily basis.
6. Unlimited smtp mailboxes and names.
7. Ownership of smtp mailbox provider.
8. This is a proprietorial interest in Usenet newsgroup
postings.
9. Big Bertha is now on the list.
10. A sustainable defense would be nice.
11. When the guns fall silent, the battle will be over.
12. There were enough shells for 42 months, without
recycling.

http://www.bigberthathing.com/corporateII.html


Big Bertha Thing mailbox

Hi there,
To those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
To those who do not understand, no explanation will suffice.


Why rec.autos.sport.nascar?
It is one of 50 newsgroups used by the opposition,
from the 3rd battle of cyberspace. (see reason below.)


The 4th battle of cyberspace answers spam attacks from Asian rim and
denial of service attacks from corporate America, with copies to
rec.autos.sport.nascar.
Without copies to rec.autos.sport.nascar, there would be no spam
attack or denial of
service attack or even 4th battle of cyberspace. It is a bit like
the chicken and the egg. Which one came first? (See mailbox logs
below.)


Did you know that a review listing off-topic postings users'
profiles, of
newsgroups used and number of postings sent to each newsgroup,
is on-topic. Also that an off-topic posting on any subject for the
benefit
of usenet newsgroups is also on-topic. One of my fields of interest
is spam
attack strategic studies. Strange to say but this is also on-topic.
Thank you,
Tony Lance

http://www.bigberthathing.com/mailbox.html

(C) Copyright Tony Lance 2007
Distribute complete and free of charge to comply.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem
From: Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:12:07 -0800
Local: Sat, Feb 10 2007 6:12 pm
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic

Tony Lance wrote:

Big Bertha Thing progress
[snip spammed crap]

Idiot swine.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++
Newsgroups: swnet.sci.astro, sci.chem
From: Tony Lance <judema...@bigberthathing.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:58:31 +0000
Local: Sun, Feb 11 2007 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: Big Bertha Thing strategic

Tuesday, November 18, 1997 10:04:23 PM

From: Tony Lance
Subject: Big Bertha Thing 1
To: FC Mods Discussion

From Bibliography of Pastures.(Optional)
The preface from
An Elementary Treatment of Gyroscopes and Similar Spinning Tops
by Crabtree 1909
Classic Cartoon and animated cartoon of
Animal Farm
by George Orwell

NB (2006) Stateside, all investment funding for super-colliders
is at ground zero; past, present and future.
Politics makes poor science.
0 new messages