Big Bertha Thing burster
Cosmic Ray Series
Possible Real World System Constructs
16K Web Page
Astrophysics net ring access site
Newsgroup Reviews including sci.astro.seti
Gamma Ray Bursters
01 feb 2000
1.THE DISCOVERY OF GRBS
2.PINPOINTING A GRB
3.CAUGHT IN THE ACT
4.COMMENTS, SOURCES, & REVISION HISTORY
Tony Lance .......................................
Big Bertha Thing publication
The statistics for Big Bertha Thing postings published
on sci.astro are as follows:-
20 No. 50K primary postings (out of 26)
2 No. 600K ditto (out of 4)
12 No. off-topic postings (out of 200)
4 No. 50K secondary postings (out of 26)
20 No. 4K ditto (out of 26)
20 No. 2K ditto (out of 26)
24 No. astronomical postings (out of 2000)
There was almost zero response to the above, which were
spread over 28 days, at the rate of two days per week.
Book-burners deleted the archive of Net Access Policy
postings prior to 2nd November 1998. Bertha saved those,
with the exception of replies and published 12.
The above were also posted to the Onenet conference
Astronomy & Space. Here days 18, 19, 20, were minimal
keep-off-the-grass days and on days 27 and 28 they
broke ranks. The on-topic filibuster of sound-bite
journalism ended, at 42 days old.
(The beginning of the end of spam.)
Big Bertha Thing Antwerp
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Planets Gather on May 5 and May 17, 2000
15,000 flying bombs landed on London in 1945, World War II. (V1 and V2)
15,000 flying bombs then landed on Antwerp in 1945.
15,000 postings, cross posted to sci.chem and three other newsgroups,
had the subject line Jeehad needs scientists.
The blow by blow of what happened, when I pointed Big Bertha Thing and
pulled the trigger, is contained on swnet.sci.astro, instead of sci.chem
I have been the primary user of swnet.sci.astro since 1998.
Would you honestly want me somewhere else?
Everyone should have a home.
Marcus Str?mberg wrote:
> > I am not interested in liitle bugs, just the gross misconduct sort.
> > Vice-presidents heads should roll.
> Don't bother even trying to understand. I don't think you'll ever will.