Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

AOL and Outlook

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Chris Burnham

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to
AOL forces you to use their proprietary client for e-mail, so no, you can't
use Outlook or any other stand-alone client for e-mail.

--
Regards,
Chris Burnham
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
diana j wrote in message ...
Is it possible to use Outlook 97 to send and receive e-mail under an AOL
account? I have a friend with a Toshiba laptop and no CD drive. I've tried
to set her up for MSN but problems and missing files. So, since she really
wants the email graphics and rich text available through Outlook or OE, I
thought maybe she could use the Outlook 97 she has installed and the AOL she
already has. Can she and what settings? Or where to go to read up? Thank
you./Diana.

diana j

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to
Thanks for the reply.  Server problems, hope this posts.
Chris Burnham wrote in message ...

Joe D. Deaver

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to

Actually, that's not true. I used to have an e-mail client called
eFax (Global Village?) that would download and transmit AOL e-mail.
It worked ok, as long as you did not use it and AOL's client at the
same time, since the AOL reader got confused over what was read
already or not when you downloaded with another client.

I think I read somewhere that Outlook 2000 would support AOL mail.

Joe D. Deaver
jde...@eaze.net

Chris Burnham

unread,
Oct 25, 1998, 2:00:00 AM10/25/98
to
Outlook supporting AOL is not the issue--it's AOL allowing 3rd party mailers
to interface with its postoffice. AOL has been very secretive about their
POP3 and SMTP addresses, which means you need to use a MAPI client in order
to interface with AOL's servers. I've not heard about eFax, so I'll take
you at your word that it could download and transmit AOL mail. My guess is
the product was developed with a MAPI interface into AOL. Unfortunately,
other products don't have this interface. Based upon what you said, I'm
wondering if AOL has allowed MS to construct just such an interface for
OL2000.

We'll all find out soon enough, I guess.

Regards,
Chris Burnham
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Joe D. Deaver wrote in message <36337acc...@news.eaze.net>...

Mark Woodburn

unread,
Oct 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/26/98
to
A friend uses AOL for email and Outlook97 as a contact database. Outlook
has crashed and locked up the laptop twice. Requiring them to remove the
battery from the laptop to powerdown and reset. Only after an uninstall and
reinstall of Outlook / Office 97 would Outlook work again. This worked for
about 3 weeks. They called the other day to inform me it happen again.

Is there any know problem between the 2 packages? If so what are the fixes?

Mark

Joe D. Deaver

unread,
Oct 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/27/98
to

Ooops, I meant FocalPoint, not eFax. It's from Global Village
Communications, Inc. in Sunnyvale, CA. I used it for a while to
download both my POP3 e-mail and AOL e-mail into the same mailbox. As
I said, once I started using it for the AOL mail, I could not
dependably use AOL flashmail download any longer. I stopped using it
about a year ago, before AOL 4.0. I am now using Outlook 98 for my
POP3 e-mail and AOL 4.0 for its own e-mail.

FocalPoint supposedly supports Compuserve mail, fax, and voice mail.
The company can be found on the web at http://www.globalvillage.com/
It works under Windows 3.1 and 95, but I had a few minor glitches when
I went to Windows 95.

Just FYI...

Joe D. Deaver
jde...@eaze.net


On Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:19:46 -0500, "Chris Burnham"

Ken Slovak [MVP-Outlook]

unread,
Oct 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/27/98
to
Focal Point can cause problems with Office applications.Take a look at
this MS KB article:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q180/4/77.asp

You can also get this article by sending an E-mail with a subject of
"Q180477" (without the quotes) to msh...@microsoft.com.


--
Ken Slovak


Mark Woodburn

unread,
Oct 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/28/98
to

Mark Woodburn wrote in message ...

Jerome J. Slote

unread,
Oct 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/28/98
to
For those hunting for an AOL solution...

I found Focal Point to be a frequent crasher. To use a 16-bit,
W95 "compatible" application for this sensitive function was pure
futility. No obvious evidence on the Global Village website that they
still sell Focal Point.

Email Connection, an Outlook competitor of sorts, still seems to
support AOL. Formerly from Connectsoft, now at email-connection.com
out of Redmond, Washington.

But I've very successfully been using the AOL Mapi Transport
withdrawn beta. Only problem I've ever had with it is its failure to
report properly any difficulties at the other end of the line. Since
Outlook also works well with WinFax/Talkworks 8.0, single-inbox
integrated communications has been a reality in my shop.

Given the third-party products produced by Focal Point and EMC,
the AOL transport scheme is probably not an impossible one to crack.
But AOL seems determined to control your user experience, show you ads
on your email retrieval, etc. There's probably no upside for
Microsoft to develop its own AOL transport. And third-parties are
caught between the giants. Leaving millions of AOL users with no good
way to use a single-inbox, MAPI-TAPI compatible communications
package. Truly absurd.

Jerome J. Slote
www.cooperstown.net

Joe D. Deaver wrote in message <363551d5...@news.eaze.net>...

Harry

unread,
Oct 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/28/98
to
Actually, AOL at one time had a test program that made a connection to AOL mail using outlook. I had it loaded on mine, but crashed my machine, and lost the Outlook add in that was emailed to me from someone else. AOL will not acknowledge any such beta test, nor will Microsoft. Microsoft had a connection on their web site that re-directed to an AOL beta site.
I wish that I still had the addin, or could still find it, but it is gone. However, it worked just fine for me for over 3 months.
 
Harry F.
0 new messages