Outlook 2007-Hangs when typing any e-mail
MVR
1.8GHz) and a AMD 4600+, (750GB HDD storage, 4GB RAM). I have installed OL
2007 on both machines, laptop and Main computer will do everything Except
allow me to write and send an E-mail. I open the new or return e-mail, start
typing, and it locks up. This is all on an IMAP server, I have 350mb as the
size of my e-mail file on the server. I have looked at many comments and
found nothing to help, I have left the machine for 1/2 an hour, and still
locked up. Any thoughts? Losing patience fast here. Thanks in Advance
kurtfreund
EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
http://www.eggheadcafe.com
Gary VanderMolen
If you are addressing a specific poster, you need to quote the pertinent portion of
that post.
Gary VanderMolen
"Kurt Freund" wrote in message news:200762314274de...@dea.spamcon.org...
Remove ABCD from Email address to reply
provide additional information?
--
Neil
"Gary VanderMolen" <ga...@NoMail.invalid> wrote in message
news:e3m%23lIdtH...@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
F.H. Muffman
>>> I am a recovering Outlook person, now very happy with Thunderbird.
>>> My wife is suffering greatly from the same problem you describe,
>>> however, and I'd appreciate it if you'd notify me if you find a
>>> solution. Thanks! EggHeadCafe.com - .NET Developer Portal of Choice
>>> http://www.eggheadcafe.com
>>
>> If you are addressing a specific poster, you need to quote the
>> pertinent portion of
>> that post.
>
> provide additional information?
Because they actually are replying to a post, as evidenced by the References
header. Also, since the poster was using the Egghead Cafe forums to post
through (as they have an NNTP <> Forum transfer engine, he doesn't realize
that what he sees is different than what everyone else in the world sees.
Also, Egghead Cafe, afaik, doesn't quote the thread by default (if it all)
and as such, most people won't actually include the text from the rest of
the thread.
Add in the fact that since they are using eggheadcafe forums, they are more
likely to be forum users rather than newsgroup users, which is a completely
different structure/format/methodology. On the forum, you wouldn't just
see this persons post, you'd see the entire thread.
If you don't like the way they play with newsgroups, go on over there and
let them know. I never got a response when I tried tho....
--
f.h.
F.H. Muffman
Should have added:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.outlook.general/msg/6937efa63a06a5d3
appears to be the post he was replying to.
--
f.h.
![Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]'s profile photo](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjUelz-dQ4fil0tj3cOM-pYNo4m1rtPoEtVvQSxTAEOY6_20Pg=s40-c)
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
Why is it so incompetent?
How can we get rid of it, or at least convince users to abandon it? It sure
makes life in the newsgroups more difficult.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"F.H. Muffman" <f.h.m...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:u74Rv$dtHHA...@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
F.H. Muffman
Well, I'm pretty sure there's a url up in the original post in the
signature. Click it.
> Why is it so incompetent?
Because they didn't tweak the settings? I don't know. I don't work there.
> How can we get rid of it, or at least convince users to abandon it?
Beats the living heck out of me. How can I convince the red states in this
country to vote democrat? Probably the same answer. Who knows. If you
figure it out, go ahead and try.
> It sure makes life in the newsgroups more difficult.
--
f.h.
Brian Tillman
> I am a recovering Outlook person, now very happy with Thunderbird. My
> wife is suffering greatly from the same problem you describe,
> however, and I'd appreciate it if you'd notify me if you find a
> solution. Thanks!
Since you didn't quote the message to which you think you're responding, no
one knows what you mean.
--
Brian Tillman