"PeterG" <Pet...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7226E3D7-0C56-4036...@microsoft.com...
> Having spent a few weeks trying to integrate these 2 products in my daily
> work, I am at a loss. Who designed these products, and who allowed them to
> be
> released? Total waste of time, and so far from becoming alternative to
> anything. Even pen and paper is more effective.
> Shame Microsoft shame.
>
> ----------------
> This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
> suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
> Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow
> this
> link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
> click "I Agree" in the message pane.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx?mid=7226e3d7-0c56-4036-be92-e95a01cada46&dg=microsoft.public.onenote
So w.o.e. is the point of selling them under the same branding ? The
same applies to the preposterous MS Publisher that doesn't even have a
common file format with Word ! Really silly IMO...
--
Mike Davies
Block-X Limited
<http://www.block-x.co.uk>
>> There seems to be a misconception that because some programs are under
>> the "Office" banner, they're designed for integration with each other.
>> That is incorrect.
>
> So w.o.e. is the point of selling them under the same branding ? The
> same applies to the preposterous MS Publisher that doesn't even have a
> common file format with Word ! Really silly IMO...
Same reason GM sells both cars and SUVs under the Buick branding. It's
just marketing.
--
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote/Outlook
Operations Coordinator
Stockholm/KSG - Honolulu
Microsoft OneNote FAQ:
http://home.hawaii.rr.com/schorr/computers/onenotefaq.htm