Yes, MOM to MOM product connector/management group to management group use
TCP port 1271.
--
Regards
Anders Bengtsson [MCSE:Security, MCSA:Messaging] | http://www.contoso.se
"FCB DSS" <FCB...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C3C891B2-4FF1-46CC...@microsoft.com...
--
Santhosh Sivarajan | MCSE (W2K3/W2K/NT4), MCSA (W2K3/W2K/MSG), CCNA
Houston, TX
http://www.blogcastrepository.com/blogs/santhosh/
http://www.sivarajan.com/publications.html
"FCB DSS" <FCB...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:C3C891B2-4FF1-46CC...@microsoft.com...
You should use the same management group name. Take a look at this post to
make sure you have al the right ports open
http://marcusoh.blogspot.com/2005/11/mom-2005-agent-port-requirements.html
---
Regards
Anders Bengtsson, MCSE:Security
http://www.contoso.se
FD> When I'm installing the other MOM server in the Secure Zone (behind
FD> the FW) do I need to specify a different Management Group name or
FD> should I use the existing name? Didn't know what issues I might run
FD> into without the ports opened for database connectivity but it
FD> sounded like I don't need that.
FD>
FD> "Santhosh Sivarajan" wrote:
FD>
You wrote root management server, that is a component or Ops Mgr 2007. Are
you running MOM 2005 och Ops Mgr 2007?
If you are running Ops Mgr 2007 and your machines in the DMZ are in a workgroup
or a non-trusted domain you could deploy a gateway server on the DMZ. If
you are running 2005 you should let your agent direct to your management
server, or install a total new management group on the DMZ and then forward
alerts with a MOM-to-MOM connector to your first management group.
---
Regards
Anders Bengtsson, MCSE:Security
http://www.contoso.se
FD> What I plan on doing is installing the second MOM server in the SZ
FD> (behind the FW) and I have the ports TCP 1271 opened to the Root
FD> Management server in our Core network. The MOM server in the SZ
FD> will have the same Management Group name as the Core and all FW
FD> ports/protocols will be opened to allow agent communication to the
FD> SZ MOM server which will in turn forward over 1271 to the MOM server
FD> in the Core. Sound right?
FD>
FD> "Anders Bengtsson" wrote:
FD>
>> Hi FCB,
>>
>> You should use the same management group name. Take a look at this
>> post to make sure you have al the right ports open
>> http://marcusoh.blogspot.com/2005/11/mom-2005-agent-port-requirements
>> .html
>>
>> ---
>> Regards
>> Anders Bengtsson, MCSE:Security
>> http://www.contoso.se
>> FD> When I'm installing the other MOM server in the Secure Zone
>> (behind
>> FD> the FW) do I need to specify a different Management Group name or
>> FD> should I use the existing name? Didn't know what issues I might
>> run
>> FD> into without the ports opened for database connectivity but it
>> FD> sounded like I don't need that.
>> FD>
>> FD> "Santhosh Sivarajan" wrote:
>> FD>
>>>> Take a look at this article:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/mom/mom2005/Library/65
>>>> 10 be7e-483f-4ca2-af13-300b4e9d9356.mspx?mfr=true
That is one solution yes. Then you will have two management groups, two seperate
MOM environments.
All machine in your DMZ then report to the DMZ management group. MOM-to-MOM
and management group to management groupe will use TCP port 1271.
---
Regards
Anders Bengtsson, MCSE:Security
http://www.contoso.se
FD> Sorry, it's MOM 2005. Been doing lots of reading about 2007.
FD> That's kind of what I thought. The Management server I'm installing
FD> in our Secure Zone (still part of a domain only behind a FW) will be
FD> a seperate Management group name and it will forward all alerts/data
FD> to the main Management server over TCP1271 that's in our Core
FD> network. Correct?
>>>> ts .html
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Regards
>>>> Anders Bengtsson, MCSE:Security
>>>> http://www.contoso.se
>>>> FD> When I'm installing the other MOM server in the Secure Zone
>>>> (behind
>>>> FD> the FW) do I need to specify a different Management Group name
>>>> or
>>>> FD> should I use the existing name? Didn't know what issues I
>>>> might
>>>> run
>>>> FD> into without the ports opened for database connectivity but it
>>>> FD> sounded like I don't need that.
>>>> FD>
>>>> FD> "Santhosh Sivarajan" wrote:
>>>> FD>
>>>>>> Take a look at this article:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/mom/mom2005/Library/
>>>>>> 65 10 be7e-483f-4ca2-af13-300b4e9d9356.mspx?mfr=true