Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sun Java Update 7

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Jo Ann

unread,
May 25, 2006, 8:57:34 PM5/25/06
to
Sun Java has released update 7.

Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does that version have to be removed first?


Peter

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:12:29 PM5/25/06
to
I believe so but where are you seeing update 7?

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
2 x XP Pro SP2 (1 everyday, 1 for testing)
P4 HT @ 3.0ghz, 2.0gb DDR, 360gb HD
"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Shenan Stanley

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:18:19 PM5/25/06
to
Jo Ann wrote:
> Sun Java has released update 7.
>
> Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does
> that version have to be removed first?

Peter wrote:
> I believe so but where are you seeing update 7?

Agreed.
I am curious as I cannot find "Java Runtime Environment Version 5.0 Update
7" anywhere.

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


B.W.

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:18:31 PM5/25/06
to
On a new PC I am seeing boxes with a red x in them, is this because I have
not got an updated Java release? If so how do I get it?

TIA

B.W.


"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:18:20 PM5/25/06
to

Shenan Stanley

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:21:50 PM5/25/06
to
Jo Ann wrote:
> Sun Java has released update 7.
>
> Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does
> that version have to be removed first?

Peter wrote:
> I believe so but where are you seeing update 7?

Thanks David!

Peter

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:25:56 PM5/25/06
to
That would explain why I only see the version I already have.. JRE
1.5.0_06-b05

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
2 x XP Pro SP2 (1 everyday, 1 for testing)
P4 HT @ 3.0ghz, 2.0gb DDR, 360gb HD

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:uTjIQJGg...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Jo Ann

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:44:56 PM5/25/06
to
"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> skrev i en meddelelse news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Sun Java has released update 7.

Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does that version have to be removed first?


I would appreciate an answer to my question - as listed above. Here are the details regarding update 7.

Sun Java - Update 7

Release Notes:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html

Installation Instructions:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/jre/install-windows.html

Download J2SE Runtime Envireonment (JRE)
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp

Shenan Stanley

unread,
May 25, 2006, 9:56:59 PM5/25/06
to
Jo Ann wrote:
> Sun Java has released update 7.
>
> Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does
> that version have to be removed first?
>
> I would appreciate an answer to my question - as listed above. Here
> are the details regarding update 7.
>
> Sun Java - Update 7
>
> Release Notes:
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ReleaseNotes.html
>
> Installation Instructions:
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/jre/install-windows.html
>
> Download J2SE Runtime Envireonment (JRE)
> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp

Unless Sun has gone insane - it will update just like all the previous ones
and will update your current version happily.

However - since Sun's download page is down for maintenance:
"Notice: We're Offline for System Upgrades"

It is difficult to confirm.

Make a system restore point, install the update, test it. Works - report
back and let us know - since the rest of us have to wait for the download to
become available.

Frankster

unread,
May 25, 2006, 10:06:36 PM5/25/06
to

"Shenan Stanley" <newsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OJ1XueGg...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

"Update" is a relative term. All the Sun Java "updates" I have installed
left the old version on the disk. It had to be removed using Add/Remove
programs. Not much of an "update" if you ask me. But, typical of Sun - Ah,
I remember those days supporting Solaris, and SunOS before that. Typical.
You'd think they would have learned something about user friendliness after
all these years :) LOL.

-Frank


Message has been deleted

Gary Smith

unread,
May 25, 2006, 11:48:20 PM5/25/06
to
In microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6.browser Leythos <vo...@nowhere.lan> wrote:
> In article <OJ1XueGg...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, newsh...@gmail.com
> says...

> > Unless Sun has gone insane - it will update just like all the previous ones
> > and will update your current version happily.

> I've seen a number of instances where the older version are left in
> place and the newer ones install beside them, not replacing them.

Same here. I routinely uninstall the older version before installing the
newer one.

--
Gary L. Smith
Columbus, Ohio

PA Bear

unread,
May 26, 2006, 1:30:26 AM5/26/06
to
1. Uninstall all Sun Java JRE runtimes you find in Add/Remove Programs.

2. Delete C:\Program Files\Java <= this folder. Do NOT delete C:\Program
Files\JavaVM <= this folder, if found.

3. Right-click on the link to download v1.5.0_7 > Save the download to your
desktop > Close all browser windows > Install.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Shell/User, Security), Aumha.org VSOP, DTS-L.org

Peter

unread,
May 26, 2006, 5:24:47 AM5/26/06
to
Odd that their normal download page is still at version 6..?

http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
2 x XP Pro SP2 (1 everyday, 1 for testing)
P4 HT @ 3.0ghz, 2.0gb DDR, 360gb HD

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message
news:uTjIQJGg...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Larry

unread,
May 26, 2006, 7:16:50 AM5/26/06
to
PA Bear, appreciate your post regarding Java updates, but I need some
additional help. In my installed program list in Control Panel, I have three
J2SE Runtime Environment 5.0 Updates, 2,4 and 6. Also, I have two Java 2
Runtime Environments, SE v1.42_03 and _06. Am I to remove all of these, just
the three J2SE entries, or just the Java 2 Runtime Environment entries?
TIA
Larry

"PA Bear" <PABe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:urI54VIg...@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

Ted Zieglar

unread,
May 26, 2006, 9:14:00 AM5/26/06
to
I would be surprised to learn that Sun did not include that information on
their website.

--
Ted Zieglar
"Backup is a computer user's best friend."

"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Ted Zieglar

unread,
May 26, 2006, 9:19:15 AM5/26/06
to
I would be surprised to learn that Sun did not include that information on
their website.

--
Ted Zieglar
"Backup is a computer user's best friend."

"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Tom [Pepper] Willett

unread,
May 26, 2006, 9:40:46 AM5/26/06
to
Sun says to *not* remove previous versions:
http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/5000070400.xml

Tom
"Ted Zieglar" <ted...@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:OYK9EcMg...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Shenan Stanley

unread,
May 26, 2006, 10:17:47 AM5/26/06
to
Jo Ann wrote:
> Sun Java has released update 7.
>
> Can that update be installed on top of the old version 6, or does
> that version have to be removed first?

Ted Zieglar wrote:
> I would be surprised to learn that Sun did not include that
> information on their website.

Tom [Pepper] Willett wrote:
> Sun says to *not* remove previous versions:
> http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/5000070400.xml

Well, they actually recommend you keep the older version..

They do not state that "You should not remove it" <- only that "It is
recommended that you keep older versions of the JRE on your system."

They even state:

"If you are running low on disk space, you can uninstall older versions of
the JRE. To remove older versions of JRE, go to Windows Java Runtime
Environment uninstallation instructions page. <
http://www.java.com/en/download/help/5000010800.xml >"

On the page you gave.

After all - there are many people who start with a clean system and have
only the last version - because that is what they downloaded.

As it seems the installer is smart enough to "update" previous versions -
but not to remove the entries in the Add/Remove programs control panel.

However - I usually do not remove the older version - only install the
latest.

Frankster

unread,
May 26, 2006, 10:41:06 AM5/26/06
to

"Ted Zieglar" <ted...@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:OYK9EcMg...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Doens't matter.

-Frank


Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE

unread,
May 26, 2006, 10:48:02 AM5/26/06
to
All of them, especially the 1.42 ones.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
"Anyone who prefers security over freedom deserves neither."


"Larry" <shelqui...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eM7FbXLg...@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

David

unread,
May 26, 2006, 10:52:24 AM5/26/06
to
I have java 1.5.0_06-b05. When I open the java control panel and try to
update, I get the message that I have the latest version of java. Do I have
to go to the jave site to update?

David

"Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:%23BNtd9F...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Alias

unread,
May 26, 2006, 12:27:28 PM5/26/06
to

Same thing happens to me and I have the same question.

Alias

Tom [Pepper] Willett

unread,
May 26, 2006, 12:51:14 PM5/26/06
to
Alias:

The new version has still not been posted on their download page, nor via
the live update.
Someone posted the direct link to the new version in one of these newsgroups
earlier, and that's how I downloaded mine. Sorry, but I no longer have the
link.

Tom
"Alias" <aka@[notme]maskedandanonymous.org> wrote in message
news:%233XpJFO...@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

C A Upsdell

unread,
May 26, 2006, 12:59:56 PM5/26/06
to
Tom [Pepper] Willett wrote:
> Alias:
>
> The new version has still not been posted on their download page, nor via
> the live update.
> Someone posted the direct link to the new version in one of these newsgroups
> earlier, and that's how I downloaded mine. Sorry, but I no longer have the
> link.

I had no problem getting it from their download page, and that was two
hours ago, and I just checked now and it is still there.

Alias

unread,
May 26, 2006, 1:01:46 PM5/26/06
to
Tom [Pepper] Willett wrote:
> Alias:
>
> The new version has still not been posted on their download page, nor via
> the live update.
> Someone posted the direct link to the new version in one of these newsgroups
> earlier, and that's how I downloaded mine. Sorry, but I no longer have the
> link.
>
> Tom

I can wait.

Alias

Tom [Pepper] Willett

unread,
May 26, 2006, 2:04:59 PM5/26/06
to
All I see on the download page is still v 6.

Tom
"C A Upsdell" <""cupsdell\"@nos...@upsdell.com"> wrote in message
news:uAsJPXOg...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

C A Upsdell

unread,
May 26, 2006, 2:13:12 PM5/26/06
to
Tom [Pepper] Willett wrote:
> All I see on the download page is still v 6.

On http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/download.jsp ? I see v7 no problem!

Tom [Pepper] Willett

unread,
May 26, 2006, 2:15:23 PM5/26/06
to
Thanks. I was going through their download section on the home page.

Tom

"C A Upsdell" <""cupsdell\"@nos...@upsdell.com"> wrote in message

news:%23%23kPLAPg...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

Jo Ann

unread,
May 26, 2006, 2:32:31 PM5/26/06
to
I just did an online installation of version 7. No problems whatsoever.

I decided not to remove version 6 before the installation and ended up with two entries in Control Panel (Add/Remove Programs), one for the old version 6 (119 mb) and one for the new version 7 (120 mb)

Removed old version 6 and now has only one entry for version 7. Everything works flawlessly.

Warning! The online install process gives you the choice of installing Google Toolbar and Google Desktop. They have the Google Toolbar checked, so be sure to remove the checkmark, if you don't want the Google Toolbar installed.

Jo Ann
===========

"Tom [Pepper] Willett" <tomp...@mvps.invalid> skrev i en meddelelse news:OohflBPg...@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Tom

unread,
May 26, 2006, 3:12:10 PM5/26/06
to
Where does it say "not"?

Don't add your own interpretations that do not mean what they say is
"recommended".

From the Sun Java link you provided:

"It is recommended that you keep older versions of the JRE on your system. "

"Tom [Pepper] Willett" <tomp...@mvps.invalid> wrote in message
news:%230iPQoM...@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:15:33 PM5/26/06
to
From: "Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com>

Always remove the old version !

Always !!

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:16:52 PM5/26/06
to
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <franks...@mvps.org>

| All of them, especially the 1.42 ones.
|

Yepper -- v1.4.x have actively exploited vulnerabilities !

PA Bear

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:28:15 PM5/26/06
to
What Frank & David said: Yes, uninstall all of them and then delete
C:\Program File\Java <= this folder before installing JRE v1.5.0_7.
--
~PA Bear

PA Bear

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:30:44 PM5/26/06
to
As does the offline install. Always choose the Custom Install option when
installing /anything/!

--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Shell/User, Security), Aumha.org VSOP, DTS-L.org

Jo Ann wrote:
<snip>

ANONYMOUS

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:40:30 PM5/26/06
to

"Tom [Pepper] Willett" wrote:
>
> Sun says to *not* remove previous versions:
> http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/5000070400.xml
>


Not quite!! It says "There might be some applications or applets
written and tested against a specific version of the JRE." Only under


these circumstances you need not remove the older onces. It also says:

"If you are running low on disk space, you can uninstall older versions
of the JRE."

hth

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 26, 2006, 4:52:34 PM5/26/06
to
From: "ANONYMOUS" <ANON...@NEWSROUPS.COM>


| Not quite!! It says "There might be some applications or applets
| written and tested against a specific version of the JRE." Only under
| these circumstances you need not remove the older onces. It also says:
|
| "If you are running low on disk space, you can uninstall older versions
| of the JRE."
|
| hth

What is MORE important is the version relative to actively exploited vulnerabilities and
Sun's Feb. 7, 06 bulletin # 102171 "Security Vulnerabilities in the Java Runtime Environment
may Allow an Untrusted Applet to Elevate its Privileges"...

The Vundo Trojan is one example of of malware that exploits the above vulnerability.

http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102171-1
"Note: It is recommended that affected versions be removed from your system. For more
information, please see the installation notes on the respective java.sun.com download
pages."

C A Upsdell

unread,
May 26, 2006, 5:38:39 PM5/26/06
to
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <franks...@mvps.org>
>
> | All of them, especially the 1.42 ones.
> |
>
> Yepper -- v1.4.x have actively exploited vulnerabilities !

Sun also has new updates for 1.3 and 1.4.

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 26, 2006, 5:44:38 PM5/26/06
to
From: "C A Upsdell" <""cupsdell\"@nos...@upsdell.com">

Which may be used *if* you are using a Java Application that is tied to a specific version
of Sun Java.

Message has been deleted

Bother@forgedpostsanonymous.unorg Cymbal Man Freq.

unread,
May 27, 2006, 1:59:47 AM5/27/06
to
Damn Java Update 6, and again 7!

They both slow my IE6 to a crawl, when opening new IE windows.
It took 25 seconds just to get Google (set as homepage) to open up with the Java
Update 7 installed, (down from 2 minutes with the version 6 Java update, which
has since been uninstalled before putting in 7). Going from webpage to webpage
is OK as long as a new one isn't opened up in a separate window.

My machine is 350 Mhz, so maybe my results just wouldn't be noticeable on a
machine that runs 10X that fast (10% of 25 seconds is 2.5 seconds).

I'm gonna have to uninstall this Java Update 7 bloatware that overloads Explorer
for way too damn long.


David H. Lipman

unread,
May 27, 2006, 12:34:43 PM5/27/06
to
From: "Don Taylor" <do...@agora.rdrop.com>


|
| Unless !!
|
| Unless you have to test your delivered apps under all versions !!

Or you don't mind Trojans such as the Vundo which are actively exploiting the
vulnerabilities in the older and vulnerable versions.
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102171-1

Jo Ann

unread,
May 27, 2006, 1:19:19 PM5/27/06
to
Where does it say that the old version 1.5.0_06 is vulnerable to Trojans such as Vundo?
Bug fixing is the reason for the update, not vulnerability - as you sem to indicate!
-----
Jo Ann

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> skrev i en meddelelse news:urDI$tagGH...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

David H. Lipman

unread,
May 27, 2006, 1:30:46 PM5/27/06
to
From: "Jo Ann" <jo...@nospam.com>

| Where does it say that the old version 1.5.0_06 is vulnerable to Trojans such as Vundo?
| Bug fixing is the reason for the update, not vulnerability - as you sem to indicate!
| -----
| Jo Ann

That specific update - no, it is NOT vulnerable and that's a good point.

ANONYMOUS

unread,
May 27, 2006, 6:08:52 PM5/27/06
to

Jo Ann wrote:
>
> Where does it say that the old version 1.5.0_06 is vulnerable to Trojans such as Vundo?
> Bug fixing is the reason for the update, not vulnerability - as you sem to indicate!
> -----

That is exactly what David is suggesting; To remove the old version
(because it is likely to be buggy) and install the new version.

You seem to have misunderstood his message.

hth

ANONYMOUS

unread,
May 27, 2006, 6:09:48 PM5/27/06
to

Well, can't satisfy all!!!

Unknown

unread,
Aug 5, 2008, 2:31:01 AM8/5/08
to
why are making this so diffikult?it used to be easy to download data now,your
always asking if the information helped or not.You would not have to ask if
you would have kept it simple

TaurArian

unread,
Aug 5, 2008, 5:39:39 AM8/5/08
to
See: http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/5000070400.xml

--

TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2009 - Update Services
http://taurarian.mvps.org
======================================
How to ask a question: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
Computer Maintenance: Acronis / Diskeeper / Paragon / Raxco


"pi...@live.com" <pi...@live.com@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:388C91CA-D9B6-4AFE...@microsoft.com...

cooksburg7

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 11:52:05 AM7/3/09
to

ND

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 12:43:21 PM7/3/09
to

No No, nothing to remove it does itself,

B8
--
ND
Return address ok.

PA Bear [MS MVP]

unread,
Jul 3, 2009, 12:56:40 PM7/3/09
to
[Please note that this thread dates from 25 May *2006* and was about JRE
v1.6.0_07, not JRE v1.7.x. The most recent JRE version is v1.6.0_14. See
http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=40890 ]

suzie educator

unread,
Sep 8, 2009, 6:32:51 AM9/8/09
to

"cooksburg7" <cooks...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AFBF7B16-26EA-4EF3...@microsoft.com...
0 new messages