1 or many ASP files??

Laphan

unread,

Aug 30, 2003, 1:18:55 PM8/30/03

to

Hi All

Just trying to clear my cluttered mind and wondering if you can help.

IYHO, if I have say 10 different product categories that extract their data
from say 10 text files or an Access DB, is it more efficient to have an ASP
for each product category to query each section or 1 which parses the lot??

The only reason I am asking is for multiple user access I have this strange
belief that if 1 page is getting requested and queried by 10 simultaneous
visitors then 'spreading the load' on different pages would help.

Is my logic correct or do the ISP fairies have this in hand??

Many thanks.

Rgds

Laphan

Manohar Kamath [MVP]

unread,

Aug 30, 2003, 1:45:54 PM8/30/03

to

No, don't think of the page as a "person" doing the work. Regardless of how
many pages you have, the load is always proportional to the number of
requests. I would code it as one page because it is easier to develop, and
in case any changes -- track and maintain. If you spread it across ten
pages, you are just increasing the redundancy.

--
Manohar Kamath
Editor, .netBooks
www.dotnetbooks.com

"Laphan" <ne...@FrozenMoles.co.uk> wrote in message
news:biqm9u$jrn$1...@hercules.btinternet.com...

Laphan

unread,

Aug 30, 2003, 3:53:31 PM8/30/03

to

Hi Manohar

Is this a definite?

I need to know because I spent 7 hours making about 100 product pages
originally, then 3 hours making it a single product page site, then 5 hours
updating another set of 100 pages thinking it was this.

I need to make sure so that I can work from this.

Thanks

Laphan

Manohar Kamath [MVP] <mka...@TAKETHISOUTkamath.com> wrote in message
news:eZAgQ6x...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...

William Tasso

unread,

Aug 31, 2003, 7:39:27 AM8/31/03

to

Laphan wrote:

[performance]

>
> I need to know because I spent 7 hours making about 100 product pages
> originally, then 3 hours making it a single product page site, then 5
> hours updating another set of 100 pages thinking it was this.
>

The issues you are facing are directly related to the poor performance of
the server your site is on. I know you know this already - we have
discussed it several times before. Move your sites to a better service and
save yourself the pain.

--
William Tasso - http://WilliamTasso.com

Manohar Kamath [MVP]

unread,

Aug 31, 2003, 11:46:56 PM8/31/03

to

Yes, most definitely.

--
Manohar Kamath
Editor, .netBooks
www.dotnetbooks.com

"Laphan" <ne...@FrozenMoles.co.uk> wrote in message

news:biqvbq$js4$2...@titan.btinternet.com...

ahmed mohamed

unread,

Dec 7, 2009, 7:59:26 PM12/7/09

to

hi every body

From http://www.google.com.eg/search?hl=ar&q=dotnetbooks&start=70&sa=N

Posted via DevelopmentNow.com Groups
http://www.developmentnow.com/g/

ahmed mohamed

unread,

Dec 7, 2009, 7:59:33 PM12/7/09

to

Bob Barrows

unread,

Dec 7, 2009, 8:21:19 PM12/7/09

to

ahmed mohamed wrote:
> hi every body
>
> From http://www.google.com.eg/search?hl=ar&q=dotnetbooks&start=70&sa=N

***canned wrong-newsgroup reply************************
There was no way for you to know it (except maybe by browsing through some
of the previous questions in this newsgroup before posting yours - always a
recommended practice) , but this is a classic (COM-based) asp newsgroup.
ASP.Net bears very little resemblance to classic ASP so, while you may be
lucky enough to find a dotnet-knowledgeable person here who can answer your
question, you can eliminate the luck factor by posting your question to a
group where those dotnet-knowledgeable people hang out. I suggest
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet or the forums at www.asp.net.
******************************************************************

--
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET - 2004-2007
Please reply to the newsgroup. This email account is my spam trap so I
don't check it very often. If you must reply off-line, then remove the
"NO SPAM"