beginner's question re quotes and tag attributes
Jeff
This is a dumb beginner question but as I begin to learn how to write
html, I've looked at some examples of existing webpages and have a
question about tag attributes.
On some pages tag attributes are entered in quotes, in others not so and
in some it is a mixture, yet they all seem to display correctly in my
browser. For instance, I've seen:
<hr size="5" noshade="noshade" width="10%">
<hr size=5 noshade="noshade" width=10%>
<hr size="5" noshade=noshade width="10%">
etc.
When is inserting " " around an attribute necessary or required and when
can they be skipped, if at all?
Is the answer I will receive true for all tag attributes or specific to
the <hr> tag.
Jeff
.rhavin grobert
the correct syntax for tags and attributes is:
<tag attribute1="value1" attribute2="value2">tag-content</tag>
<tag attribute1="value1" attribute2="value2" />
but browser have been programmed to be "nice", so they accept wrong
html, what is one of the reasons why they are so slow and huge. you
should always use the correct syntax, because there will be
*hopefully* a day when browers just state...
!! This is wrong html, i wont show it !!
... and by that force the web-designers to write correct html.
Jeff
Thank you. Will try.
Jeff
they say that they are obedient to the Pope, that is "hypocrisy." If they
are ready to subscribe to all the articles, that is not enough. If they say
that a man must not be killed for an apple, "they attack the morality of
Catholics." If miracles are done among them, it is not a sign of holiness,
and is, on the contrary a symptom of heresy.
This way in which the Church has existed is that truth has been without
dispute, or, if it has been contested, there has been the Pope, or, failing
him, there has been the Church.
850. The five propositions condemned, but no miracle; for the truth was not
attacked. But the Sorbonne... but the bull...
It is impossible that those who love God with all their heart should fail to
recognise the Church; so evident is she. It is impossible that those who do
not love God should be convinced of the Church.
Miracles have such influence that it was necessary that God should warn men
not to believe in them in opposition to Him, all clear as it is that there
is a God. Without this they would have been able to disturb men.
And thus so far from these passages, Deut. 13, making against the authority
of the miracles, nothing more indicates their influence. And the same in
respect of Antichrist. "To seduce, if it were possible, even the elect."
851. The hi