When an asset is retired and has not been fully depreciated, the net book
value is calculated as cost basis less LTD depreciation. Our client believes
that this is bad accounting practice. The net book value should be zero when
an asset has been retired, even if it has not bee fully depreciated. I
understand that when running FA reports it excludes assets with a status of
retired, however, when using smartlist > fixed assets book, there is no field
to filter out all assets with a status of retired. This makes it difficult
for the client to correctly analyse their assets, especially when the
standard GP reports does not provide the information that is required. Some
of our GP consultants also believes that the net book value should be zero
when the asset has been retired. I know that Axapta and Navision zeros out
the net book value when the asset is retired. GP should behave the same way.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/Businesssolutions/Community/NewsGroups/dgbrowser/en-us/default.mspx?mid=f6c75d90-cdd5-42b3-9854-47d3986a41c1&dg=microsoft.public.greatplains