"Joe Wickers" <joewi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fk_rd.5638$Pd2.2...@monger.newsread.com...
>
>
> Hi
>
> We are trying to decide on wether to use VPN of use GoToMypc.com. VPN
> makes your home computer an actual node on the office network. GTMPC is
> more like PCAnywhere, all that you see at home is the monitor of an office
> PC you have connected to and that you can control.
>
> With foxpro, if I open a very large table, how slow would this be if I was
> working over a VPN? Does Foxpro buffer the data transfer and only show me
> what I am loking at or does the entire table need to be passed to my home
> computer for me to work with it? Hopefully you understand what I am
> getting at... While VPN seems more attractive to me because I become an
> actual node on my office network, I am worried that Foxpro will be very
> slow with that solution, especiually on very large tables.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mitch
>
Our remote employees have VPN connections for security reasons, primarily to
access internal systems like e-mail. For anything disk-based (such as
accessing a dbf), performance is glacial. For those situations, they use VNC
(similar to GTMPC) _over the VPN connection_ to access a PC here at the
office. (Our LAN admin won't open up ANYTHING he can't control. <g>)
Dan
"Joe Wickers" <joewi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fk_rd.5638$Pd2.2...@monger.newsread.com...
>
>
"Joe Wickers" <joewi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Fk_rd.5638$Pd2.2...@monger.newsread.com...
>
>
For our operations in 5 countries, we use centrally located terminal servers
and data servers, all on a 10GB network segment. Then 100MB out to the
routers, and 2 or 4MB to the country offices, where we use thin clients, or
PCs running Remote Desktop client.