[snip]
cmj wrote:
> >c...@arc.com (cmj) wrote:
> >
> >>Here's a hypothetical setup and maybe somebody here can tell me how/if
> >>it would work.
> >>
> >>Lets say a company wants ALL email internal and smtp to dump into one
> >>mail box. Lets say the company has about 15 users with @.com emails.
> >
> >Let's say you read the Exchange Service Pack release notes. I'd bet
> >you'd find the answer in a section titled "Message Journaling"!
>
> Let's say I don't have any Service Packs installed. Then let's hear
> your advice, you pompous MSFT asshole.
>
> >
> >>Using Exchange5.5 and Outlook clients, would it require a public
> >>folder or a common mailbox with appropriate permissions? Then, what
> >>could be done to give alerts to the individual Outlook clients/NT
> >>accounts that a message for that account has arrived in the public
> >>box? It would be better to not send a CC: or alternate recepient, but
> >>just a pop up box saying "OK, go sift through the common box and find
> >>your new message"
> >
> >Give all 15 NT Accounts the role of "User" on that common mailbox.
> >
> >
> >------------------
> >Rich Matheisen
> >MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
> >MS Exchange FAQ at http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
--
Corrections are welcome.
For "Good post" practice visit
http://members.home.com/dts-l/goodpost.htm
Kirill.
Why would *anyone* post to this newsgroup with "hypothetical" problems ?
If I don't have any *real* problems to fix, I prefer to go home and see my
family.....
(plenty of problems will arrive tomorrow :-)
> I think Netscape has kill filters. Maybe you should become acquainted
> with that concept. I'm not sure what the Russian term for that is
> though, sorry.
I am not worried about myself. I want you to stop insulting good people.
>
>
> Have a nice day.
Leave your sarcasm for youself - nobody here needs it.
> <snip>