De antemano agradezco su ayuda.
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.mspx#EZB
Q. Which licensing model should I choose—the server plus device CAL, the
server plus user CAL, or the processor license?
A. It depends on the specific situation, but here are some general guidelines:
• For externally focused server applications. Processor licensing is a
better choice for externally focused server applications, such as Internet
and extranet scenarios. It is often difficult to count devices or users in
these scenarios, so hardware-based pricing is more straightforward.
• For mixed-use servers. For mixed-use servers that will be accessed from
both inside and outside the organization's firewall, processor licensing is
generally favorable. Because the processor licenses are probably needed for
external users, there would be no need to purchase access separately for
internal users through CALs.
• For environments inside the firewall. For environments inside the firewall
where client-to-server processor ratios are relatively low, the server plus
device CAL licensing model will likely be the more cost-effective choice if
there are multiple users per device (for example, in a call center), while
the server plus user CAL licensing model will likely be more cost-effective
if there are multiple devices per user. For environments inside the firewall
where client-to-server processor ratios are high, the processor licensing
model will likely be more cost-effective.
Si usted tiene usuarios que van a acceder via internet, desde el exterior a
su red, adquiera una licencia por-procesador.
Ademas sepa que las licencias CAL cuentan aun en forma indirecta. Es decir,
si una aplicacion web se conecta a SQL Server, y a esa aplicacion se conectan
N usuarios, entonces son N CALs. Es erroneo decir que hay una sola conexion.
Esto está explicado en el documento:
--
Gustavo Larriera, Microsoft MVP
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gustavolarriera
--
Este mensaje se proporciona tal como es, sin garantías de ninguna clase.