Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

SUN盗版案将挽救番茄花园

4 views
Skip to first unread message

dishones...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 2:21:24 PM9/18/08
to
SUN盗版案将挽救番茄花园

原文网址:http://int.ipr.gov.cn/ipr/inter/info/Article.jsp?
a_no=237384&col_no=1285&dir=200809

洪磊粉丝网站 人民邮电报

番茄花园案:根据JENKINS-LAPORTE法则根本不成立!!!

番茄花园涉嫌侵权微软版权,奥运期间,8月15日,其网站主人洪磊被拘捕,儿子身陷牢狱,洪父卧病不起。美国自称知识产权保护是很完善的,因此美国法

番茄花园案有指导性意义。洪磊可能想不到,最终帮他的可能是一个美国法官。在两个非常类似的美国联邦法院案例中,一个中国人起诉SUN 公司
(SUN MICROSYSTEMS)(购买8个许可,却无限制使用)和SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)(购买一个许可,大肆拷贝)盗版,美国加州法官
MARTINJ. JENKINS却两次判中国人告负,并命令中国人支付盗版公司巨额律师费。

番茄花园的案情与SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)的案情相似。但番茄花园不存在欺骗行为,番茄花园虽然也改动了视窗软件,但从没有隐瞒其修改事实,是得

了微软多年的默许的。根据上述SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)盗版案判例法,番茄花园的情节根本不构成侵权:微软无法证明洪磊阅读了微软的许可限
制,即使能证明洪磊阅读了相关限制,也不能证明他同意了那些限制。

微软是美国公司,其软件的开发是在美国,它的知识产权注册在美国,保护当然根据美国法律。美国号称是知识产权保护完善的国家,其判例精神具有很强的参

价值。如果美国公司MICROSOFT的知识产权按美国法律都不受保护,却要寻求中国法保护,那是很荒唐、很可笑的。

Download video!

Download video!

编辑 >>
(本文发表于首页时事·历史·军事, 已被阅读11563次)
本文通告引用(Trackback)链接: /wp-trackback.php?p=42849
《SUN盗版案将挽救番茄花园》共30件评论

1. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

Why knows 洪磊's attorney? please pass this blog to him/her.
2. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:11 pm

微软无法证明洪磊阅读了微软的许可限制,即使能证明洪磊阅读了相关限制,也不能证明他同意了那些限制。

where it comes from?
3. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

We should support Hong Lei, find him a good lawyer who knows the
Sun case, and use it for his defense against Microsoft. Sun hates
Microsoft the most. This Sun case can be used to bring down Microsoft
in China. Sun people should be happy.
4. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

同他们协商没有意义,因为只要利益不一致,他们就会公然蔑视任何协定.
5. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

This is very clever. Sun's grand plot to finish off its old
enemy Microsoft. It intentionally stole software from some Chinese,
then bot cheap judges to rule in its favour, knowing the judges are
not willing to let Chinese win a lawsuit. The judges bot by Sun make
the new law and the new law must be followed by other judges under
stare decisis. Now, Microsoft lost protection of its software, and
will die soon.
6. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

East Wind Blow,
Battle Drum Play,
Now the 世界上究竟 Who 怕 Who?
Not People 怕美帝,
But 美帝怕 People,
Got Road 多助,Lost Road 寡助,
历史规律 Don't 抗拒,Don't 抗拒,
美帝国主义 Must 灭亡,
全世界 People Must 胜利,
全世界 People (Soon) Must 胜利!
7. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:29 pm

SUN盗版案是签了文件的, "one user can only use the software on one
computer for one license". 但法官说违背"一个人只准在一台机器上使用软件"的条款不是侵权。

http://www.american-justice.org/index.pxe/ctype=Page/objid=44
8. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

"Now, Microsoft lost protection of its software, and will die
soon."

Bill Gates have more money, he can bot all judges.
9. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

Sun hate MS. Google also hate MS. MS depends on copyright. No
copyright, MS die, Google happy (think Youtube).
10. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

与虎谋皮, 拳头才是硬道理。
11. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 9:08 pm

打倒美帝国主义。
12. 匿名游客的评论
September 16th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

bot = bought?
13. 湖南人胡说八道的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 10:17 am

湖南人的最大特色市欺骗加土匪胆子;毛泽东是以例, 岳主导是一例,多维更是如此:竟是把混蛋们搞成了"民族英雄"。

以后不要看多伟的所谓"新闻 ",因为是骗子新闻。
14. 湖南人胡说八道的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 10:18 am

湖南人的最大特色市欺骗加土匪胆子;毛泽东是以例, 岳主导是一例,多维更是如此:竟是把混蛋们搞成了"民族英雄"。

以后不要看多维的所谓"新闻 ",因为是骗子新闻。
15. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 2:57 pm

TO #13 and # 14
你是反中国和反中国人民的,因为你总是偏向美国老。也可能是轮子吧.
16. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 3:06 pm

To #13 and #14:
如你是人,千万不要看多维的所谓"新闻".如再看到你的评论,说明你又上多维网来了.那你就不是人。是一个没有诚信的东西。
17. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

把 SUN 从中国赶出去.
18. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

打官司就像打仗,在敌强我弱的情况下,要建立最广泛的统一战线,
打超限战、持久战,打人民战争。毛主席说过,美国人很霸道,
不讲道理,如果他讲道理,那是因为他没办法了。
19. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

中国人就是狗屎。
20. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 5:53 pm

Sun Microsystems can buy its way out, up to the U.S. supreme
court -- the judges only paid about $200,000 a year, pretty cheap to
buy off. But it cannot buy public opinion and the truth...
21. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

http://www.judiciaryreport.com/bribing_a_judge.htm

"$100,000 is the going rate in big cases (federal level) and
$5,000 to $20,000 in smaller ones."
22. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:02 pm

US judiciary is bogus.
23. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:04 pm

Black federal district judge found taking bribes.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE4D61438F934A1575A...

The inquiry involves Federal District Judge Robert F. Collins,
59 years old, who was appointed in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter as
one of the first modern black Federal judges in the Deep South. Judge
Collins, who has not been charged, had been a prominent civil rights
lawyer and a judge in a state criminal district court.
24. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

如果他讲道理,那是因为他没办法了。

haha!
25. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

U.S. District Judge Robert F. Collins was convicted today of
scheming to split $100,000 from a drug smuggler, making him the first
federal judge to be found guilty of taking a bribe.

Collins, who was caught with $16,500 in FBI-marked money, was
the first black federal judge in the modern-day Deep South. He and the
alleged bagman, John Ross, a politically connected businessman, were
found guilty of bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice.
26. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

more judge stories

http://www.fa-ir.org/ai/judgeware.htm
27. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

ha ha, googled out this one

http://www.northcountrygazette.org/articles/062106SexToys.html
and this

http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/judges_gone_wil.html
28. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

ha ha read this one (the page at the bottom) Lisa Foster

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0121051judge1.html
29. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

儿子身陷牢狱,洪父卧病不起. find 洪父?
30. 匿名游客的评论
September 17th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

中国法保护? what is 中国法?

DuckulA

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 8:59:02 PM9/18/08
to
番茄fens疯了。。。

Hello, dishones...@gmail.com!
You wrote on Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:21:24 -0700 (PDT):

dj> 原文网址:http://int.ipr.gov.cn/ipr/inter/info/Article.jsp?
dj> a_no=237384&col_no=1285&dir=200809

dj> 洪磊粉丝网站 人民邮电报

dj> 番茄花园案:根据JENKINS-LAPORTE法则根本不成立!!!

dj> 番茄花园涉嫌侵权微软版权,奥运期间,8月15日,其网站主人洪磊被拘捕,儿子身陷牢狱,洪父卧病不起。美国自称知识产权保护是很完善的,因此美国法
dj> 对
dj> 番茄花园案有指导性意义。洪磊可能想不到,最终帮他的可能是一个美国法官。在两个非常类似的美国联邦法院案例中,一个中国人起诉SUN 公司
dj> (SUN MICROSYSTEMS)(购买8个许可,却无限制使用)和SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)(购买一个许可,大肆拷贝)盗版,美国加州法官
dj> MARTINJ. JENKINS却两次判中国人告负,并命令中国人支付盗版公司巨额律师费。


dj> 番茄花园的案情与SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)的案情相似。但番茄花园不存在欺骗行为,番茄花园虽然也改动了视窗软件,但从没有隐瞒其修改事实,是得
dj> 到
dj> 了微软多年的默许的。根据上述SYMANTEC(赛门铁克)盗版案判例法,番茄花园的情节根本不构成侵权:微软无法证明洪磊阅读了微软的许可限
dj> 制,即使能证明洪磊阅读了相关限制,也不能证明他同意了那些限制。

dj> 微软是美国公司,其软件的开发是在美国,它的知识产权注册在美国,保护当然根据美国法律。美国号称是知识产权保护完善的国家,其判例精神具有很强的参
dj> 考
dj> 价值。如果美国公司MICROSOFT的知识产权按美国法律都不受保护,却要寻求中国法保护,那是很荒唐、很可笑的。

dj> Download video!

dj> Download video!

dj> (本文发表于首页时事·历史·军事, 已被阅读11563次)
dj> 本文通告引用(Trackback)链接: /wp-trackback.php?p=42849
dj> 《SUN盗版案将挽救番茄花园》共30件评论

dj> 1. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

dj> Why knows 洪磊's attorney? please pass this blog to him/her.
dj> 2. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:11 pm

dj> 微软无法证明洪磊阅读了微软的许可限制,即使能证明洪磊阅读了相关限制,也不能证明他同意了那些限制。

dj> where it comes from?
dj> 3. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

dj> We should support Hong Lei, find him a good lawyer who knows the
dj> Sun case, and use it for his defense against Microsoft. Sun hates
dj> Microsoft the most. This Sun case can be used to bring down Microsoft
dj> in China. Sun people should be happy.
dj> 4. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

dj> 同他们协商没有意义,因为只要利益不一致,他们就会公然蔑视任何协定.
dj> 5. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

dj> This is very clever. Sun's grand plot to finish off its old
dj> enemy Microsoft. It intentionally stole software from some Chinese,
dj> then bot cheap judges to rule in its favour, knowing the judges are
dj> not willing to let Chinese win a lawsuit. The judges bot by Sun make
dj> the new law and the new law must be followed by other judges under
dj> stare decisis. Now, Microsoft lost protection of its software, and
dj> will die soon.
dj> 6. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

dj> East Wind Blow,
dj> Battle Drum Play,
dj> Now the 世界上究竟 Who 怕 Who?
dj> Not People 怕美帝,
dj> But 美帝怕 People,
dj> Got Road 多助,Lost Road 寡助,
dj> 历史规律 Don't 抗拒,Don't 抗拒,
dj> 美帝国主义 Must 灭亡,
dj> 全世界 People Must 胜利,
dj> 全世界 People (Soon) Must 胜利!
dj> 7. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:29 pm

dj> SUN盗版案是签了文件的, "one user can only use the software on one
dj> computer for one license". 但法官说违背"一个人只准在一台机器上使用软件"的条款不是侵权。

dj> http://www.american-justice.org/index.pxe/ctype=Page/objid=44
dj> 8. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

dj> "Now, Microsoft lost protection of its software, and will die
dj> soon."

dj> Bill Gates have more money, he can bot all judges.
dj> 9. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 6:42 pm

dj> Sun hate MS. Google also hate MS. MS depends on copyright. No
dj> copyright, MS die, Google happy (think Youtube).
dj> 10. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

dj> 与虎谋皮, 拳头才是硬道理。
dj> 11. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 9:08 pm

dj> 打倒美帝国主义。
dj> 12. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 16th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

dj> bot = bought?
dj> 13. 湖南人胡说八道的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 10:17 am

dj> 湖南人的最大特色市欺骗加土匪胆子;毛泽东是以例, 岳主导是一例,多维更是如此:竟是把混蛋们搞成了"民族英雄"。

dj> 以后不要看多伟的所谓"新闻 ",因为是骗子新闻。
dj> 14. 湖南人胡说八道的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 10:18 am

dj> 湖南人的最大特色市欺骗加土匪胆子;毛泽东是以例, 岳主导是一例,多维更是如此:竟是把混蛋们搞成了"民族英雄"。

dj> 以后不要看多维的所谓"新闻 ",因为是骗子新闻。
dj> 15. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 2:57 pm

dj> TO #13 and # 14
dj> 你是反中国和反中国人民的,因为你总是偏向美国老。也可能是轮子吧.
dj> 16. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 3:06 pm

dj> To #13 and #14:
dj> 如你是人,千万不要看多维的所谓"新闻".如再看到你的评论,说明你又上多维网来了.那你就不是人。是一个没有诚信的东西。
dj> 17. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

dj> 把 SUN 从中国赶出去.
dj> 18. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

dj> 打官司就像打仗,在敌强我弱的情况下,要建立最广泛的统一战线,
dj> 打超限战、持久战,打人民战争。毛主席说过,美国人很霸道,
dj> 不讲道理,如果他讲道理,那是因为他没办法了。
dj> 19. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

dj> 中国人就是狗屎。
dj> 20. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 5:53 pm

dj> Sun Microsystems can buy its way out, up to the U.S. supreme
dj> court -- the judges only paid about $200,000 a year, pretty cheap to
dj> buy off. But it cannot buy public opinion and the truth...
dj> 21. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

dj> http://www.judiciaryreport.com/bribing_a_judge.htm

dj> "$100,000 is the going rate in big cases (federal level) and
dj> $5,000 to $20,000 in smaller ones."
dj> 22. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:02 pm

dj> US judiciary is bogus.
dj> 23. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:04 pm

dj> Black federal district judge found taking bribes.

dj>
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE4D61438F934A1575A...

dj> The inquiry involves Federal District Judge Robert F. Collins,
dj> 59 years old, who was appointed in 1978 by President Jimmy Carter as
dj> one of the first modern black Federal judges in the Deep South. Judge
dj> Collins, who has not been charged, had been a prominent civil rights
dj> lawyer and a judge in a state criminal district court.
dj> 24. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

dj> 如果他讲道理,那是因为他没办法了。

dj> haha!
dj> 25. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:07 pm

dj> U.S. District Judge Robert F. Collins was convicted today of
dj> scheming to split $100,000 from a drug smuggler, making him the first
dj> federal judge to be found guilty of taking a bribe.

dj> Collins, who was caught with $16,500 in FBI-marked money, was
dj> the first black federal judge in the modern-day Deep South. He and the
dj> alleged bagman, John Ross, a politically connected businessman, were
dj> found guilty of bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice.
dj> 26. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

dj> more judge stories

dj> http://www.fa-ir.org/ai/judgeware.htm
dj> 27. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

dj> ha ha, googled out this one

dj> http://www.northcountrygazette.org/articles/062106SexToys.html
dj> and this

dj>
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/judges_gone_wil.html
dj> 28. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

dj> ha ha read this one (the page at the bottom) Lisa Foster

dj> http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0121051judge1.html
dj> 29. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

dj> 儿子身陷牢狱,洪父卧病不起. find 洪父?
dj> 30. 匿名游客的评论
dj> September 17th, 2008 at 10:20 pm


With best regards, DuckulA. E-mail: For...@gmail.com


zhusupe

unread,
Sep 18, 2008, 9:10:15 PM9/18/08
to
一般都是女孩子。

batch

unread,
Sep 30, 2008, 3:39:40 AM9/30/08
to
说不定会是NC

"zhusupe" <zhusupe...@gmail.com> 写入消息 news:gautrs$56q$2...@news.cn99.com...

荒村聽雨

unread,
Oct 11, 2008, 3:29:28 PM10/11/08
to
国际现货黄金
> 提供服务:
> 24小时服务热线免费咨询;
> 免费模拟账户;
> 交易系统的安装,讲解;
> 短信,电话行情即时报价;
> 提供每日行情分析和咨询;
> 客户资金管理和操作建议。
> 公司: 利家安国际投资集团有限公司 武汉隆鑫丰投资顾问有限公司
> 地址: 武汉武昌洪山区洪山广场洪广大酒店10楼F座
> QQ : 35429666 联系电话:13554513297 投资交流群:3110292
> 邮箱: cro...@sina.com
> 博客: http://blog.cnfol.com/lxf
> http://hi.baidu.com/35429666
>
> 现货黄金与其它投资行业区别
> 一:国际现货黄金的特点
> 1.T+0交易规则:允许当日平仓,并允许投资者进行多次交易。
> 2.资金杠杆:通过定金模式下单,提高资金利用率,降低交易门槛。
> 3.报价:直接以美国道琼斯即时报价系统为交易依据,以美元/盎司标价,快速直观。
>
> 4.交易时间:20小时交易时段,涵盖了交易量最大的欧洲盘时段和美洲盘时段,增加获利机会。交易时间宽松,交易方式便利,不与工作时间、地点相冲突,尤其适合上班一族。
> 5.做空机制:无论大势是涨是跌,都有机会入场获利。
> 6.交易方式:交易快捷方便,简单易学。客户主要采用网上交易系统下单委托,也可以电话委托下单,公司另外提供行情分析系统,短信报价平台。
>
> 二:与其他理财品种的比较:
> 投资金额:
> 外汇: 可多可少,以小博大,保证金比例一般为2%-10%
> 期货: 可多可少,以小博大,保证金比例一般为10%左右
> 股票: 可多可少,100%资金投入
> 房地产: 资金庞大,一般需贷款支付利息
> 存款储蓄: 可多可少,100%资金投入
> 保险: 可多可少,100%资金投入
> 现货黄金交易: 可多可少,资金杠杆比例大约为33到50倍
> 投资期限(流动性):
> 外汇: 24小时,T+0
> 期货: 4小时交易,T+0
> 股票: 4小时 交 易,T+1
> 房地产: 期限较长,以年计
> 存款储蓄: 期限较长,以年计
> 保险: 20年左右
> 现货黄金交易: 24小时交易,T+0
> 投资回报:
> 外汇: 涨跌均有收益机会,风险较大
> 期货: 涨跌均有获利机会,行情受大户影响,趋势不易判断,风险大
> 股票: 上涨时有获利机会,下跌普遍亏损
> 房地产: 上涨时有获利机会,投资回报较高
> 存款储蓄: 收益稳定,但回报率低
> 保险: 回报率低于存款
> 现货黄金交易:涨跌均有收益机会,风险较外汇及期货小,较股票及存款大
> 交易手续/变现能力 :
> 外汇: 即时交易,100%成交
> 期货: 即时交易,价格撮合
> 股票: 价格撮合,有可能无法成交
> 房地产: 手续复杂,变现能力差
> 存款储蓄: 简单
> 保险: 简单
> 现货黄金交易: 即时交易,100%成交
> 费用:
> 外汇: 汇价点差,各种货币不等
> 期货: 交易手续费,较少
> 股票: 交易手续费,较少
> 房地产: 最大
> 存款储蓄: 很少,几乎为零
> 现货黄金交易:买卖价差,较低
> 灵活性:
> 外汇: 双向全日交易,获利机会多
> 期货: 双向限时交易,获利机会多
> 股票: 单向交易
> 房地产: 单向交易,期限长,灵活性最差
> 存款储蓄: 随时可以存入或领取
> 保险: 求现不易,提前解约会有损失
> 现货黄金交易:双向显示交易,获利机会多
> 影响因素:
> 外汇: 全球市场,成交量巨大,不受大户操纵
> 期货: 成交量少,受大户操控严重,常出现“逼仓”
> 股票: 市场不透明,受大户操控严重
> 房地产: 人为因素比较重
> 存款储蓄: 国家政策
> 现货黄金交易:全球市场,成交量巨大,不受大户操控
> 技术分析:
> 外汇: 技术分析图形不受人为改变,最为可靠
> 期货: 技术图形可以人为改变,真实性较差
> 股票: 技术图形可以人为改变,真实性较差
> 现货黄金交易:技术分析图形不受人为改变,最为可靠
> 风险程度:
> 外汇: 风险较大,但控制完善,有限价、止损等保障
> 期货: 风险很高,市场不够成熟,风险控制措施不够完善
> 股票: 风险很高,如套牢资金占用时间长,政策市场风险不易防范
> 房地产: 风险相当高,一旦投资有误,可能长期收不回投资,损失惨重
> 存款储蓄: 货币贬值风险
> 保险: 以备不时之需,风险最小
> 现货黄金交易:风险适中,控制完善,有获利、止损等保障


<dishones...@gmail.com> 写入消息
news:ff58b75f-6f5f-4224...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

crocodil...@gmail.com

unread,
Mar 8, 2013, 9:35:17 PM3/8/13
to
大家做伦敦金/伦敦银(现货金/现货银)投资时要特别小心!
设勿将阁下的该投资户口密码交给任何人呀!
包括阁下的经纪呀.
因为阁下要对阁下的投资负责任呀!
而且投资前要问清楚呀!
请勿心急呀!
即使阁下的经纪催促做买卖决定下也先停下来,想清楚呀!
小心做金融大鳄点心呀!
当心羊入虎口,做普通蟹民呀.
警讯话:[骗局源于贪念];
小心有[天遇]伦敦金骗局呀!

有人在2010年中不幸帮衬天誉国际金业有限公司( Prestige ) 的经纪后出事啊.

电邮地址: ad...@pibullion.com
QQ : 4006762425
网址: http://www.prestigegroup.com.hk/index.php

有人在那里投资伦敦金(现货金),
被那公司姓陈及姓林两女经纪游说交密码使她们代为投资,
但原来她们投资经验好差,好容易就输清光.
所以做伦敦金(现货金)买卖就不可以假手于人呀,要亲力亲为呀!
之后竟然被自称那公司男职员电话警告不可以投诉啊呀!
希望那公司加强监管经纪啦.

0 new messages