Is this group still up and active?
Scott
Auric__
> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
--
Sure, she's evil, but she doesn't actually ACT on her evilness. Much.
ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com
<not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>
>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
--
ArarghMail909 at [drop the 'http://www.' from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html
To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.
Auric__
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>>
>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>
>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>
> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
--
How can I tell that the past isn't a fiction designed to account for the
discrepancy between my immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?
ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com
<not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:07 GMT, wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>
>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>
>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>
>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only 539
posts since the middle of 2003.
Auric__
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:25 GMT, "Auric__"
> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:07 GMT, wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>>
>>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>>
>>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>>
>>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
>
> They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only 539
> posts since the middle of 2003.
IIRC the purpose of this group is supposed to be non-DOS, non-Windows BASICs.
Amiga BASIC, QB Mac, etc.
--
The guilty developer can be identified and harassed
without human intervention.
ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com
>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:25 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>>>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
>> They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only 539
>> posts since the middle of 2003.
>
>IIRC the purpose of this group is supposed to be non-DOS, non-Windows BASICs.
>Amiga BASIC, QB Mac, etc.
Was 'Amiga BASIC' a microsoft product?
I think there were several assorted 'QB Mac' products.
I couldn't find an FAQ for this group, but then, it's a microsoft
group, and they don't follow the rules, anyway. :-)
Auric__
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:43:59 GMT, "Auric__"
>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:20:12 GMT, wrote:
>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:25 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:07 GMT, wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>>>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>>>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>>>>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
>>> They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only 539
>>> posts since the middle of 2003.
>>
>>IIRC the purpose of this group is supposed to be non-DOS, non-Windows
>>BASICs. Amiga BASIC, QB Mac, etc.
> Was 'Amiga BASIC' a microsoft product?
IIRC it was "Microsoft BASIC for the Amiga", but regardless of the name, yes,
it was an MS product. I still have my copy *somewhere*.
> I think there were several assorted 'QB Mac' products.
I'm specifically talking about MS QuickBASIC for the Mac... which I have
never actually *seen*, but have heard of. (See the Wikipedia QB page.)
> I couldn't find an FAQ for this group, but then, it's a microsoft
> group, and they don't follow the rules, anyway. :-)
Extra-special no comment. ;-)
--
Irony -- it's like goldy or bronzey only made of iron.
ArarghMai...@not.at.arargh.com
<not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:15:23 GMT, wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:43:59 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:20:12 GMT, wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:25 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:07 GMT, wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>>>>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>>>>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>>>>>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
>>>> They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only 539
>>>> posts since the middle of 2003.
>>>
>>>IIRC the purpose of this group is supposed to be non-DOS, non-Windows
>>>BASICs. Amiga BASIC, QB Mac, etc.
>> Was 'Amiga BASIC' a microsoft product?
>
>IIRC it was "Microsoft BASIC for the Amiga", but regardless of the name, yes,
>it was an MS product. I still have my copy *somewhere*.
Must have been WAY back. :-)
>> I think there were several assorted 'QB Mac' products.
>
>I'm specifically talking about MS QuickBASIC for the Mac... which I have
>never actually *seen*, but have heard of. (See the Wikipedia QB page.)
That one I had heard of, at least.
>> I couldn't find an FAQ for this group, but then, it's a microsoft
>> group, and they don't follow the rules, anyway. :-)
>
>Extra-special no comment. ;-)
--
Auric__
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:11:12 GMT, "Auric__"
> <not.m...@email.address> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 07 Oct 2009 03:15:23 GMT, wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:43:59 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:20:12 GMT, wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:25 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:11:07 GMT, wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:01:19 GMT, "Auric__"
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:06:41 GMT, Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello? Is anyone still participating in this group.
>>>>>>>>Here, yes. Actively participating... well, I'm here, anyway.
>>>>>>> Pretty dead, though. Only about 15 posts all year.
>>>>>>Yeah. Most people have moved on to other groups. alb, clbm, etc.
>>>>> They must have done that a while back. :-) My archive shows only
>>>>> 539 posts since the middle of 2003.
>>>>
>>>>IIRC the purpose of this group is supposed to be non-DOS, non-Windows
>>>>BASICs. Amiga BASIC, QB Mac, etc.
>>> Was 'Amiga BASIC' a microsoft product?
>>
>>IIRC it was "Microsoft BASIC for the Amiga", but regardless of the name,
>>yes, it was an MS product. I still have my copy *somewhere*.
> Must have been WAY back. :-)
Here, found it at Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AmigaBASIC
--
And that matters how?