What is the "official" name of the Health Check specification?

[Mike Croft]

Looking in the eclipse/microprofile-health and the eclipse/microprofile-bom repositories, I can see it referred to as:

• Service Healthchecks
• Service Health Checks
• Eclipse MicroProfile Health Check

There's a similar thing with JWT where I can see:

• Eclipse MicroProfile Interoperable JWT RBAC
  
• Eclipse MicroProfile JWT Authentication
  

I expect that the correct names should be the ones found in the MicroProfile Bom repository are correct, so Eclipse MicroProfile Health Check and Eclipse MicroProfile JWT Authentication.

Just trying to be consistent in how I write about them!

[Emily Jiang]

In my opinion, what you highlighted should be the official names. I do agree we should unify the names and stick to it.
Emily

[Heiko Braun]

+1

[Kevin Sutter]

+1, Mike.  Of course, I like the ones specified in the MP bom repo...  :-)

On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 12:38:22 AM UTC-5, Heiko Braun wrote:

+1

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

I sent a PR to make name of the spec consistent [1].

I wanted everybody to be aware that this PR changes the name of artefact in the project (i.e. microprofile-health-api becomes microprofile-health-check-api). 

Is it ok for you or should you stick to the existing artefact names ?

Antoine

[1] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-health/pull/121

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Eclipse MicroProfile" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to microprofile...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to microp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/5198698a-995e-4555-862d-b17eabba0be1%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Emily Jiang]

I think we should stay with the artifact ID. In this case, I prefer it is called 'MicroProfile Health' instead of 'MicroProfile Health Check' for less disturbing changes.


Thanks
Emily

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

Agree. I'm reverting the name to original one

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/microprofile/43e42a5c-1da3-409c-b68a-8ad8ac7359c8%40googlegroups.com.

[Antoine Sabot-Durand]

So, do we align the align the name on the artefact id in the spec and go for "MicroProfile health" or do we stick to "MicroProfile health check" in the spec and keep the shortname "microprofile-health" in pom files ? 

[Emily Jiang]

I prefer to use MicroProfile Health so that everywhere is synced up, and we don't need to change the artifact id. The repo is already correct.

Emily